Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry and RAVEC - claims he was trapped by RF

1000 replies

smilesy · 11/04/2025 19:04

Okay. So first of all thanks to everyone on the last thread for a really civilised discussion about Harry and his security. The Telegraph has an exclusive article where Harry claims that his security was removed to “trap” him in the RF. I’m really sorry but for some reason I am unable to archive Telegraph articles at the moment. Could anyone help?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
IcedPurple · 12/04/2025 18:30

Starseeking · 12/04/2025 18:21

And they have a whole team of them, working round the clock…

I'm not entirely convinced that they do. The security officers I've seen with them don't look to me to be exactly top of the range, not that I have any expertise or anything.

Incidentally, it seems that they and their children have been in three entirely different locations over the past few days. She was in New York, he in London and Ukraine and the children presumably in California. That's presumably going to add quite a bit to their security bill, but that doesn't seem to bother them.

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 12/04/2025 18:32

BigWillyLittleTodger · 12/04/2025 18:24

She so would if she could, it would be merching kerching for her with links on her Instagram for commission on her clothes! No way will the royals allow that though fortunately!

Wouldn't you think Harry would have had the gumption to side-eye that comment at least! She was costing Charles a fortune on couture design fgs let alone all the rest!

It's not entirely unprecedented though. I wonder what the security arrangements were for the Duke and Duchess of Windsor in Paris?

IdaGlossop · 12/04/2025 18:34

smilesy · 12/04/2025 18:29

I think Charles may well have had enough of Harry’s antics. He has been getting closer to William and he is apparently fond of Catherine and must have been concerned over her treatment during the “where’s Catherine” bollocks. I think Charles would be happy to demur to RAVEC and would be able to cite the reply his mother was given when she enquired about Harry’s security. The only reason Charles might want to interfere would perhaps be if it allowed him to see his DGC. But given that they are unlikely to come without their mother and that I think he’ll will freeze over before she comes here (all of which Charles is very probably aware of), there wouldn’t seem to be much point. His DGC would be able to visit a royal palace with full security anyway 🤷‍♀️

Charles is pretty popular at the moment, being a serious statesperson and engaging with all sorts of ordinary people. He and the courtiers must know that Harry is now reviled by many. The monarchy has to work constantly to remain relevant. If Charles behaved unconstitutional by intervening over 'darling boy's' security, it would be a foolish move.

Edited for typos

BruFord · 12/04/2025 18:37

Puzzledandpissedoff · 12/04/2025 18:22

Which brings me back to wondering whether, in the US, they actually have the kind of full time security they want here, or whether they're just hired for selected events

@Puzzledandpissedoff Montecito is home to several celebrities so I imagine that the town crawling with security. Anyone who doesn’t seem “naice” is probably shooed away quickly. 😂

So they may not need to pay for much themselves as us plebs will be kept away. I reckon a decent alarm system and one bloke strolling around is quite adequate.

Choux · 12/04/2025 18:38

According to this article about the cost of providing round the clock security to ex PMs it costs over £1.1m per ex PM for 2 officers round the clock all year. I don’t know what happens when they travel either with or without their families and if their home is always protected even when they are on holiday. The costs can easily rack up so if you can get someone else to pay for it then…

I bet Harry had barely paid for anything in his life before he bought the house in Montecito.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14163833/amp/The-Tories-got-PMs-bill-security-unsustainable.html

Tories got through so many PMs that security bill is 'unsustainable'

The UK currently has its largest number of former heads of government in history, fuelled by the Conservatives' tumultuous period which has seen the party go through four PMs in three years.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14163833/amp/The-Tories-got-PMs-bill-security-unsustainable.html

Mightymoog · 12/04/2025 18:39

smilesy · 12/04/2025 18:02

Harry might. I’m not sure Meghan “I can’t believe I’m not getting paid to do this” would though

oh I think she would.
Standing on the balony waving then her outfit straight out there for buying.
The dollar signs would be lighting up in her eyes.
That's what they were after with the half in half out.

Starseeking · 12/04/2025 18:41

IdaGlossop · 12/04/2025 18:34

Charles is pretty popular at the moment, being a serious statesperson and engaging with all sorts of ordinary people. He and the courtiers must know that Harry is now reviled by many. The monarchy has to work constantly to remain relevant. If Charles behaved unconstitutional by intervening over 'darling boy's' security, it would be a foolish move.

Edited for typos

Edited

I doubt Charles would do that; from what we’ve seen he knows the rules and generally follows what his advisers tell him to do (I wonder if the person who advised him it was a good idea to do the Dimbleby interview all those years ago got the sack?!?)

IcedPurple · 12/04/2025 18:42

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 12/04/2025 18:32

Wouldn't you think Harry would have had the gumption to side-eye that comment at least! She was costing Charles a fortune on couture design fgs let alone all the rest!

It's not entirely unprecedented though. I wonder what the security arrangements were for the Duke and Duchess of Windsor in Paris?

It was so long ago, and RAVEC didn't exist then, so I don't think it's relevant to the current situation.

Also, Edward had been an actual King whereas Harry has never been anything more than the 'spare' so their situations aren't really comparable.

PinkPonyClubber · 12/04/2025 18:46

I’ve seen a comment on Twitter that if Harry is entitled all this security on tap, then so should Andrew. In a few years Harry will also be the sibling of the monarch. So should B&E get it too.

HonoriaBulstrode · 12/04/2025 18:48

She was costing Charles a fortune on couture design fgs let alone all the rest!

There was the wedding reception which he paid for, which went way over budget. Scobie said so in Finding Freedom, so that's not lies put about by the haterz.

I don't believe Charles would act unconstitutionally, but if he is upset by the whole situation, I think this is where Camilla would have a calming influence. No doubt to be spun by Harry as Evil Stepmother Turning Pa Against Me.

smilesy · 12/04/2025 18:49

PinkPonyClubber · 12/04/2025 18:46

I’ve seen a comment on Twitter that if Harry is entitled all this security on tap, then so should Andrew. In a few years Harry will also be the sibling of the monarch. So should B&E get it too.

Absolutely. This just underlines that fact that Harry just doesn’t get that it’s nothing to do with you just being in the family, and everything to do with your seniority in the hierarchy

OP posts:
BigWillyLittleTodger · 12/04/2025 18:49

smilesy · 12/04/2025 18:29

I think Charles may well have had enough of Harry’s antics. He has been getting closer to William and he is apparently fond of Catherine and must have been concerned over her treatment during the “where’s Catherine” bollocks. I think Charles would be happy to demur to RAVEC and would be able to cite the reply his mother was given when she enquired about Harry’s security. The only reason Charles might want to interfere would perhaps be if it allowed him to see his DGC. But given that they are unlikely to come without their mother and that I think he’ll will freeze over before she comes here (all of which Charles is very probably aware of), there wouldn’t seem to be much point. His DGC would be able to visit a royal palace with full security anyway 🤷‍♀️

Hopefully you are right and Charles could use the response the Queen received as an “out”.

IcedPurple · 12/04/2025 18:53

Starseeking · 12/04/2025 18:41

I doubt Charles would do that; from what we’ve seen he knows the rules and generally follows what his advisers tell him to do (I wonder if the person who advised him it was a good idea to do the Dimbleby interview all those years ago got the sack?!?)

I agree that it's highly unlikely Charles would get involved.

If he were so inclined, surely he'd have done so well before things got to this point? Making a few 'suggestions' to a hitherto fairly obscure body like RAVEC would surely be a lot easier than interfering with the courts of law. As someone said above, this is His Majesty's Courts versus His Majesty's Government, so for the King to interfere would be a very serious matter. I don't see why he would risk it because of Harry's ridiculous toys from pram 'case'.

Weepixie · 12/04/2025 18:55

BigWillyLittleTodger · 12/04/2025 18:15

I agree with this, and I am concerned that Charles would try and influence this case to give “darling boy” what he demands, like you say, who would know? It wouldn’t surprise me if Charles felt so devastated and brow beaten by Harry that he will intervene in some way to try to give him what he wants, the Queen expressed her wishes on Harry’s security so Harry is expecting even more from Charles, hence the toddler tantrum. Hopefully even if Charles does try he will get the same answer as the Queen.

I suspect TLQ intervened knowing full well it would be fruitless but she could always say to Harry, I tried.

smilesy · 12/04/2025 18:57

Weepixie · 12/04/2025 18:55

I suspect TLQ intervened knowing full well it would be fruitless but she could always say to Harry, I tried.

That’s what I think too

OP posts:
wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 12/04/2025 19:03

IcedPurple · 12/04/2025 18:42

It was so long ago, and RAVEC didn't exist then, so I don't think it's relevant to the current situation.

Also, Edward had been an actual King whereas Harry has never been anything more than the 'spare' so their situations aren't really comparable.

I know, just interested in how his security was provided and who paid for it.

HiRen · 12/04/2025 19:05

Weepixie · 12/04/2025 18:55

I suspect TLQ intervened knowing full well it would be fruitless but she could always say to Harry, I tried.

Well I think she could tell herself that she tried. Nobody wishes ill on their child or grandchild. I don’t imagine anyone wants to be in that position.

Munnygirl · 12/04/2025 19:11

IdaGlossop · 12/04/2025 18:24

£11m according to some reports.

Wow no way no wonder they want it paid for them! They’d have to continue to earn a staggering amount to keep this up.i don’t think they have it in them

IdaGlossop · 12/04/2025 19:13

Munnygirl · 12/04/2025 19:11

Wow no way no wonder they want it paid for them! They’d have to continue to earn a staggering amount to keep this up.i don’t think they have it in them

If it really is that much (I doubt it, tbh), there's no wonder Harry has been obsessed about it for five years.

MummyJ12 · 12/04/2025 19:14

Puzzledandpissedoff · 12/04/2025 17:24

Harry needs to get his story straight, he and his wife were either forced out of the RF or trapped in by them. Both can’t be true!

I'm reminded of Alice in Wonderland, @mummyj12 ...
"Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast"

After all it makes roughly the same sense as the drivel that Harry comes out with, when like a child he believes only what suits in any given moment

Love this! You’re so right.
Another quote from Alice in Wonderland which is quite apt for Harry,
I am not crazy, my reality is just different than yours.”

Mightymoog · 12/04/2025 19:14

Munnygirl · 12/04/2025 19:11

Wow no way no wonder they want it paid for them! They’d have to continue to earn a staggering amount to keep this up.i don’t think they have it in them

That's a hell of a lot of pancake mix to shift

IcedPurple · 12/04/2025 19:16

Munnygirl · 12/04/2025 19:11

Wow no way no wonder they want it paid for them! They’d have to continue to earn a staggering amount to keep this up.i don’t think they have it in them

I think that estimate is based on the assumption that they're hiring the nearest possible equivalent of RPO's round the clock. However, when they've been photographed out and about, they seem to have the same type of bodyguard lots of celebrities have. Remember that clumsy guy getting photographed carrying around his Glock in a case in New York? I don't think a high level security guard would do that.

There's no way they can afford anything close to an 8 figure sum for security annually, and I really don't think they're paying anything like that amount.

Munnygirl · 12/04/2025 19:16

Mightymoog · 12/04/2025 19:14

That's a hell of a lot of pancake mix to shift

😆

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.