Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.

1000 replies

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 16:22

Commissionable links- means when a potential customer clicks on the link, it's attributed to the affiliate, allowing the brand to record the source of the traffic. If someone buys a product using an affiliate link, the brand will pay the affiliate marketer commission on the sale

But she’s not an influencer?

This is really sad actually.

Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.
OP posts:
Thread gallery
31
Weepixie · 26/03/2025 18:36

wordler · 26/03/2025 18:27

It was a kids TV show - it was the implication of a BJ - you didn’t get to see anything - cannot possibly be classed as a soft porn scene.

It was 90210, the remake of the original series which was far from a kids show. The clip is still available to watch online. And yes, it was very obvious what she was supposed to be doing. It was explicit without having to see actual body parts (apart from her head bobbing up and down)

jeffgoldblum · 26/03/2025 18:39

wordler · 26/03/2025 18:27

It was a kids TV show - it was the implication of a BJ - you didn’t get to see anything - cannot possibly be classed as a soft porn scene.

A kids tv show!
that makes it a hundred times worse not better whether it was implied or not.

EmpressOfTheThread · 26/03/2025 18:41

Andylion · 26/03/2025 18:26

Fuck me this blew up.

@EmpressOfTheThread if by “the usual” you mean I sound like an SS member, I assure you I am not.

I supposed if this thread had been a conversation my tone would have made it clear that I didn’t mean to accuse anyone of actually saying that Meghan was in porn.

To recap my thoughts:
I don’t care what Meghan did as a working actress.
I think Meghan and her husband are batshit.
I think Harry should be held responsible for a lot of what happened with Meghan when they were working members of the RF, and what they say happened to Meghan.
I think that nothing she does will be well-received because of the hole she and Harry have dug for themselves.

To clarify, I don't think you're a member of the SS. I'm sure it has another meaning - sugars? I don't think so, I just meant some people don't appear to allow criticism of Meghan and I assumed that was your point. The "ffs" perhaps misled me.
I agree with your other points and I definitely blame Harry for much of it, although I do think they're a folie a deux.

EmpressOfTheThread · 26/03/2025 18:42

jeffgoldblum · 26/03/2025 18:39

A kids tv show!
that makes it a hundred times worse not better whether it was implied or not.

It was a kids show?!

SoNotaRealHousewife · 26/03/2025 18:46

I’ve have now watched the clip, I would say it was an implied BJ ( how did my life come to this?)

EmpressOfTheThread · 26/03/2025 18:49

Weepixie · 26/03/2025 18:36

It was 90210, the remake of the original series which was far from a kids show. The clip is still available to watch online. And yes, it was very obvious what she was supposed to be doing. It was explicit without having to see actual body parts (apart from her head bobbing up and down)

Edited

😬

Weepixie · 26/03/2025 18:49

It wasn’t a kids show. It was set in Beverley Hills and followed the lives and lives of a group of teenagers as they entered their college years and beyond. It originally started in 1991 and covered the topics of the day

This explains it better than I can

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beverly_Hills,_90210

Meghan was in the 2019 remake that only ran for 6 episodes.

Beverly Hills, 90210 - Wikipedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beverly_Hills,_90210

MrsLeonFarrell · 26/03/2025 18:51

To get back on topic, today Meghan is using Daniel Martin to sell the make up she used at her wedding. Or maybe he is selling it and she is linking to his Instagram, I'm not an expert on this.

Meanwhile the Queen is promoting her royal reading room, the King is talking about the importance of soil and William is highlighting a couple who started an organisation to help with royal mental health in Cornwall. He has just become their charity's Patron.

If Meghan just dropped the Duchess title in her venture the contrast would not be there to notice but as it is, it's rather stark.

I'm more and more certain that she will succeed better without the title, it weighs her down.

Weepixie · 26/03/2025 18:52

SoNotaRealHousewife · 26/03/2025 18:46

I’ve have now watched the clip, I would say it was an implied BJ ( how did my life come to this?)

Someone bending down into the lap of the driver and pretending to be looking for their polo mints could be considered an implied blow job. But your head bobbing up and down repeatedly puts a completely different slant on it.

EmpressOfTheThread · 26/03/2025 18:53

Good points, @MrsLeonFarrell , but truthfully, what is she without the title? Someone who used to be in Beverly Hills 90210 and Suits?
She needs the royal cachet.

Weepixie · 26/03/2025 18:54

To get back on topic

Sorry. 😊

Fortunypleatsingreen · 26/03/2025 18:56

BigWillyLittleTodger · 26/03/2025 13:31

I think @Serenster posted the figures earlier in this thread.

Thanks I must have must have missed it. I will try and locate.

EmpressOfTheThread · 26/03/2025 18:57

Weepixie · 26/03/2025 18:54

To get back on topic

Sorry. 😊

🍆😂

MrsLeonFarrell · 26/03/2025 18:58

EmpressOfTheThread · 26/03/2025 18:53

Good points, @MrsLeonFarrell , but truthfully, what is she without the title? Someone who used to be in Beverly Hills 90210 and Suits?
She needs the royal cachet.

The title will always be there because everyone knows she has it and regardless of everything she has a higher profile because of it. She doesn't need to actually use it and if she was simply Meghan, she would get the publicity but less backlash and so more sales. I suspect that the proportion of people in the US who would buy from her because she is royal is smaller than the proportion who would buy because she is a celebrity with a large profile. The US is so vast she doesn't need the royal market there.

EmpressOfTheThread · 26/03/2025 18:59

MrsLeonFarrell · 26/03/2025 18:58

The title will always be there because everyone knows she has it and regardless of everything she has a higher profile because of it. She doesn't need to actually use it and if she was simply Meghan, she would get the publicity but less backlash and so more sales. I suspect that the proportion of people in the US who would buy from her because she is royal is smaller than the proportion who would buy because she is a celebrity with a large profile. The US is so vast she doesn't need the royal market there.

Yes, that's a fair point. I think it would be a wise move, for sure.

SoNotaRealHousewife · 26/03/2025 19:02

@Weepixieperhsps they couldn’t find their polo mints and had to keep bobbing up and down looking for them!

AtIusvue · 26/03/2025 19:02

Happy to endlessly talk about blowjobs but has a hissy fit when I joked Onlyfans. Ffs

OP posts:
SoNotaRealHousewife · 26/03/2025 19:03

🤣

IAmATorturedPoet · 26/03/2025 19:12

🤣

Weepixie · 26/03/2025 19:18

AtIusvue · 26/03/2025 19:02

Happy to endlessly talk about blowjobs but has a hissy fit when I joked Onlyfans. Ffs

This is the second time today you’ve followed me around one of your threads and passed comment on my posts and the fact I’m on what you call ‘your thread’. That I shouldn’t be here.

It’s also the second time you’ve specifically mentioned Onlyfans and it’s obvious you’re still rattled I challenged you for saying Meghan could try Onlyfans next. That it was nothing that should be suggested for any woman, and neither should it be suggested that Meghan would consider it for herself. And that your idea of a joke wasn’t a joke.

I think you have 2 choices going forward.

1 - You can take some medicine for the obvious discomfort you’re feeling - something that works on wind or sour grapes.

2 - Or you can just ignore me.

The choice is yours and I know what I’ll be doing.

BruFord · 26/03/2025 19:20

IdaGlossop · 26/03/2025 18:30

I see no hatchet being buried. With the brighter royals, it's always monarchy first, family second. My knee is on William wielding the sword the second his bottom lands on the throne.

@IdaGlossop It wouldn't surprise me either!

AtIusvue · 26/03/2025 19:27

Weepixie · 26/03/2025 19:18

This is the second time today you’ve followed me around one of your threads and passed comment on my posts and the fact I’m on what you call ‘your thread’. That I shouldn’t be here.

It’s also the second time you’ve specifically mentioned Onlyfans and it’s obvious you’re still rattled I challenged you for saying Meghan could try Onlyfans next. That it was nothing that should be suggested for any woman, and neither should it be suggested that Meghan would consider it for herself. And that your idea of a joke wasn’t a joke.

I think you have 2 choices going forward.

1 - You can take some medicine for the obvious discomfort you’re feeling - something that works on wind or sour grapes.

2 - Or you can just ignore me.

The choice is yours and I know what I’ll be doing.

Edited

…..but youre happy to endlessly talk about Meg performing blowjobs but took a high horse attitude over a joke. Also, you don’t seem to understand what Onlyfans is. Which makes sense.

OP posts:
JSMill · 26/03/2025 19:28

Yes I noticed this today. They are all doing worthwhile meaningful things and she’s selling beige clothes on Instagram. What a world away from that grand statement in January 2020.

AtIusvue · 26/03/2025 19:29

And I commented on the other thread because you made a remark about me, so of course I’m calling you up on it. But still….here you are on another one

OP posts:
SoNotaRealHousewife · 26/03/2025 19:31

JSMill · 26/03/2025 19:28

Yes I noticed this today. They are all doing worthwhile meaningful things and she’s selling beige clothes on Instagram. What a world away from that grand statement in January 2020.

I think that sums up why people are discussing this. So much hype about what they were going to do, very little has came to fruition and now it’s selling clothes. I’m also quite surprised that she wears so much beige, I thought now she is away from the confines of the RF she would attempt a more colourful look

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.