Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.

1000 replies

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 16:22

Commissionable links- means when a potential customer clicks on the link, it's attributed to the affiliate, allowing the brand to record the source of the traffic. If someone buys a product using an affiliate link, the brand will pay the affiliate marketer commission on the sale

But she’s not an influencer?

This is really sad actually.

Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.
OP posts:
Thread gallery
31
mainecooncatonahottinroof · 26/03/2025 15:46

Riapia · 26/03/2025 13:29

Nothing gives quite as much pleasure as seeing the way someone can be married in a royal castle and reduced to pleading for people to buy some clothes.
How the mighty have fallen.

I'm no fan of MM and I agree she has fallen so far, but I don't take pleasure in it.

I wish they had stayed in the RF and done something more befitting of his birthright. Maybe it's for the best though because she would have created merry hell with her bullying and jealousy. She is a thoroughly avaricious woman and she will never be content.

Ohpleeeease · 26/03/2025 15:59

MrsSkylerWhite · 26/03/2025 00:04

BigWillyLittleTodger · Today 00:01
**
I see the but but Andrew brigade have arrived.

🤣

People with a shred of decency, I think you mean.

Yes. a mere shred.

EmpressOfTheThread · 26/03/2025 17:26

jeffgoldblum · 26/03/2025 13:11

Indeed @EmpressOfTheThread! It’s sadly posts like this that makes the rest of us who just criticise actions look bad!
and it seems a bit disingenuous.

You know what, Jeff? I decided years ago that no-one was going to shut me up or say that I could not express a valid opinion!

EmpressOfTheThread · 26/03/2025 17:29

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 26/03/2025 15:21

It's grammatically incorrect.

It's an interesting concept really. Was I "hating on" Shakespeare when I critically analysed his work in years gone by?

Yes, and I've clearly been "hating on" Trump for weeks! Fortunately, on the Politics threads, criticism isn't only acceptable, it's welcomed!

Andylion · 26/03/2025 17:35

EmpressOfTheThread · 26/03/2025 13:04

Yes you can be criticised.. You can choose the parts. You don't have to be the totty or the eye candy, you don't have to get down to your pants or dust in a basque and you certainly don't need to take a role where you simulate a sex act.
Many actresses wait on tables and work in bars rather than do those sorts of jobs.

Why do I feel the need to preface this with “I am not a Meghan fan…” but here goes:

FFS, she wasn’t in porn, those two scenes were in Beverly Hills 90210 and CSI. Give it a rest.

EmpressOfTheThread · 26/03/2025 17:44

Andylion · 26/03/2025 17:35

Why do I feel the need to preface this with “I am not a Meghan fan…” but here goes:

FFS, she wasn’t in porn, those two scenes were in Beverly Hills 90210 and CSI. Give it a rest.

Who said she was in porn? Such hyperbole, ffs give it a rest.

jeffgoldblum · 26/03/2025 17:47

If she was a porn star this conversation probably wouldn’t be happening!!
it may be 2025 but it highly unlikely that Harry would have been allowed to marry her!!!
not without completely leaving the monarchy anyway.

Weepixie · 26/03/2025 17:48

@EmpressOfTheThread people can define porn however they like. And yes, what she acted out was pornographic to some.

jeffgoldblum · 26/03/2025 17:49

Psst @Weepixie… you meant @Andylion.

Andylion · 26/03/2025 17:51

EmpressOfTheThread · 26/03/2025 17:44

Who said she was in porn? Such hyperbole, ffs give it a rest.

I didn’t say that anyone said she was in porn. I was saying that people were so put out by these roles that they were almost equated to porn.

Weepixie · 26/03/2025 17:52

jeffgoldblum · 26/03/2025 17:49

Psst @Weepixie… you meant @Andylion.

Thank you. I’ve been here too long today and it’s time I went to bed.

EmpressOfTheThread · 26/03/2025 17:53

jeffgoldblum · 26/03/2025 17:47

If she was a porn star this conversation probably wouldn’t be happening!!
it may be 2025 but it highly unlikely that Harry would have been allowed to marry her!!!
not without completely leaving the monarchy anyway.

I know! Good grief. Criticism of Meghan's actions just isn't acceptable to some. At all.
Yes, I judge her acting career. No off Broadway plays for her, or challenging unflattering roles. These roles all have something in common. Her career, her choice, but not all actresses go down that route.

EmpressOfTheThread · 26/03/2025 17:53

Andylion · 26/03/2025 17:51

I didn’t say that anyone said she was in porn. I was saying that people were so put out by these roles that they were almost equated to porn.

Not by me.

Weepixie · 26/03/2025 17:58

Yes, I equated them to porn. I also said she was a hypocrite and a very poor excuse for a feminist.

Weepixie · 26/03/2025 18:00

Sorry, that should be I equated them to porn but I didn’t say that here. I did however comment on them disapprovingly.

SoNotaRealHousewife · 26/03/2025 18:12

How did we get to porn?? 🤣

jeffgoldblum · 26/03/2025 18:14

Weepixie · 26/03/2025 17:58

Yes, I equated them to porn. I also said she was a hypocrite and a very poor excuse for a feminist.

I fully agree! Bj on tv were always considered “soft” porn , not sure why anyone would disagree!
and I don’t care if people thinks that makes me uptight!

meghan can do as she pleases but her actions are the opposite of her words!

EmpressOfTheThread · 26/03/2025 18:14

SoNotaRealHousewife · 26/03/2025 18:12

How did we get to porn?? 🤣

@Andylion claimed that I had equated Meghan's career choices to porn.
I had not.
It's just the usual.

jeffgoldblum · 26/03/2025 18:15

SoNotaRealHousewife · 26/03/2025 18:12

How did we get to porn?? 🤣

Ask @Andylion! 🤣

SoNotaRealHousewife · 26/03/2025 18:17

🤣🤣

Andylion · 26/03/2025 18:26

Fuck me this blew up.

@EmpressOfTheThread if by “the usual” you mean I sound like an SS member, I assure you I am not.

I supposed if this thread had been a conversation my tone would have made it clear that I didn’t mean to accuse anyone of actually saying that Meghan was in porn.

To recap my thoughts:
I don’t care what Meghan did as a working actress.
I think Meghan and her husband are batshit.
I think Harry should be held responsible for a lot of what happened with Meghan when they were working members of the RF, and what they say happened to Meghan.
I think that nothing she does will be well-received because of the hole she and Harry have dug for themselves.

wordler · 26/03/2025 18:27

jeffgoldblum · 26/03/2025 18:14

I fully agree! Bj on tv were always considered “soft” porn , not sure why anyone would disagree!
and I don’t care if people thinks that makes me uptight!

meghan can do as she pleases but her actions are the opposite of her words!

It was a kids TV show - it was the implication of a BJ - you didn’t get to see anything - cannot possibly be classed as a soft porn scene.

BruFord · 26/03/2025 18:27

IdaGlossop · 24/03/2025 16:59

This is a good development. If she can shift stuff and make a living, that's far better than trashing the Royal family for money.

I agree @IdaGlossop, better to be making their own money-plus they don’t have any up-to-date info. on the family now anyway.

As o here have said, if using her title is a legal grey area, I can’t see Charles doing anything about it. But when William comes to the throne, it could be different. I hope that the Sussexes have made enough money to live on by then (their idea of enough money that is, they already have plenty by most people’s standards!) or better still, that the brothers have buried the hatchet.

IdaGlossop · 26/03/2025 18:30

BruFord · 26/03/2025 18:27

I agree @IdaGlossop, better to be making their own money-plus they don’t have any up-to-date info. on the family now anyway.

As o here have said, if using her title is a legal grey area, I can’t see Charles doing anything about it. But when William comes to the throne, it could be different. I hope that the Sussexes have made enough money to live on by then (their idea of enough money that is, they already have plenty by most people’s standards!) or better still, that the brothers have buried the hatchet.

I see no hatchet being buried. With the brighter royals, it's always monarchy first, family second. My knee is on William wielding the sword the second his bottom lands on the throne.

Weepixie · 26/03/2025 18:34

jeffgoldblum · 26/03/2025 18:14

I fully agree! Bj on tv were always considered “soft” porn , not sure why anyone would disagree!
and I don’t care if people thinks that makes me uptight!

meghan can do as she pleases but her actions are the opposite of her words!

I agree.

I stopped at using the word porn when I posted originally because I didn’t know if it would get me banned.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.