Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.

[AtIusvue]

Commissionable links- means when a potential customer clicks on the link, it's attributed to the affiliate, allowing the brand to record the source of the traffic. If someone buys a product using an affiliate link, the brand will pay the affiliate marketer commission on the sale

But she’s not an influencer?

This is really sad actually.

Sorry but I disagree . I have an actress in my family who spent several years trudging around the country doing theatre shows and an occasional bit part on TV . Being very attractive she was frequently offered roles which required nudity etc but she always refused as she wanted to be an actress and not just famous.
Currently in a TV series !

Of course you can’t say …. But obviously myself and others would be stretching the truth to say we aren’t dying of curiosity! 🤣

I’m guessing it’s not Rivals 😂

That old chestnut of an excuse again.

Possibly not!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Sorry I had to come back to this comment because I missed the first line!

now I’m far from being a fan of Meghan, after all I consider her a liar and a bully!
but … detest? That seems a bit strong! And dare I say it a tad overblown, dislike of someone’s behaviour isn’t necessarily dislike of the person themselves.

Overblown! Jeff you crack me up

Yes you can be criticised.. You can choose the parts. You don't have to be the totty or the eye candy, you don't have to get down to your pants or dust in a basque and you certainly don't need to take a role where you simulate a sex act.
Many actresses wait on tables and work in bars rather than do those sorts of jobs.

No, I don't detest her or "hate on" her🙄.
I criticise her words and actions. Very different.

Yes, teenagers use it, and I think it's on tiktok.

🤣🤣🤣 I’m always very careful with my choice of words @AtIusvue!! 😉🤣🤣

I'm far from being a teenager and don't have a TikTok account but use it!

Indeed @EmpressOfTheThread! It’s sadly posts like this that makes the rest of us who just criticise actions look bad!
and it seems a bit disingenuous.

It was her choice. She's done suitcase girl with implants and skimpy dresses. She did hot girl on plane. She did bbq girl sucking on a sausage or was it a burger? She did sexy French maid She simulated oral sex. She did sexy lawyer and even Harry has admitted he hated looking at that. It was her choice and she hadn't been the first actress to do that but it was her choice.

Nothing gives quite as much pleasure as seeing the way someone can be married in a royal castle and reduced to pleading for people to buy some clothes.
How the mighty have fallen.

I think @Serenster posted the figures earlier in this thread.

I thought it might be a good idea for some US economic reality to come through. California is one of the states mentioned in the article.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-cuts-hit-struggling-food-banks-risking-hunger-low-income-americans-2025-03-25/

Thanks @BemusedAmerican, always welcome and interesting to see the American perspective 👍

Why would that make you cheer? It only looks bad on you

I really don't know why. I wouldn't be seen dead in most of what she wears.

The proof will be in the pudding to see whether "anything to do with Meghan sells". I wonder where the market for $1000 bland dresses is.

What about the dedicated pro-Meghan posters who spend their time combing threads that they know are likely to contain criticism of her (criticism which by the way she sets up through her own actions) only to make negative personal comments lambasting other posters? Do they also need to get some "fresh ffs"[sic]?

It's grammatically incorrect.

It's an interesting concept really. Was I "hating on" Shakespeare when I critically analysed his work in years gone by?

How is she "doing well"? What has she actually accomplished at this stage?

It's not very dignified though is it?!

I agree with you! Plus it's a tad bizarre for a self-professed feminist!

So THATS why they had the “Tell me where you go your clothes from” segment on her Netflix show