Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.

[AtIusvue]

Commissionable links- means when a potential customer clicks on the link, it's attributed to the affiliate, allowing the brand to record the source of the traffic. If someone buys a product using an affiliate link, the brand will pay the affiliate marketer commission on the sale

But she’s not an influencer?

This is really sad actually.

I don't think many people would be interested in their children tbh.
Beyond a very fleeting " oh, that's what they look like" what else of interest is there in them?
We're only interested in the parents for the schadenfreude .

the minutae of 9 years ago being picked over.

@weepixie

The only embarrassment comes from a very strange reaction to a joke and continued attempt at seeking my attention.

Im not in the least bit embarrassed by my Onlyfans joke, in fact I’m quite proud.

You won’t convince me otherwise

These meghan fans are absolutely falling apart this morning.

I refrained from commenting on your post. I think many posters may have done as I did. It was ‘ick’. That you had 12 responses of ‘funny’ is pretty ick too - in my opinion.

yeh of course. I believe you…… 😂

That face means the ick by the way? Right?

Also the same meghan fans hopping between threads to ‘contribute’

You hop between threads...and?

I don’t think she deserves venomous commentary.

But in terms of the children, I’ve seen multiple threads on here criticising specific celebrities for showing their children, but also more broadly criticising the general concept of influencers using their children on social media. So it’s not like she/they are uniquely criticised for it while everyone else is fine. MN in general takes quite a dim view of children on SM I think, even non-celebrities putting pics on their fb for family to see is often discussed negatively with comments around children’s consent and privacy.
If you add in her comments around the dangers of SM, and not wanting her children photographed, then I don’t think it’s a wildly unfair or surprising criticism.

I’m not on the joyful Meghan thread. I’m not there because I have nothing to contribute to that thread. I also don’t look for arguments like others do.

Shame others don’t have the same respect.

Also…I create threads. I don’t jump on others to start arguments.

I recall Harry saying he worried about the Wales DC because of their roles . He also wanted to ensure that the Late Queen had the right people around her . Pompous ass.
Meghan said she couldn’t take Archie to school in the U.K. as there would be 50 photographers waiting ( in her dreams). They said they wanted to raise their DC out of the limelight without titles .
People are calling out the hypocrisy.

PR continues

So the podcast sounds like diary of a CEO type thing. Nothing exciting, nothing terrible. But the way she speaks seems so performative that it doesn’t sound like she’s having a normal conversation. Starts 8th April. I’m sure Harry will be listening in to get business ideas

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14533675/Meghan-Markle-trailer-new-podcast-Confessions-Female-Founder.html

@Weepixie

“she had about $7million when she married into the RF”. ????

And another posted did this originally - Cherry picked some of my words and not even included the full sentence so it looked like that was all I wrote. Why has that been pulled out of a full sentence of mine?

The following is the last paragraph of my post and contains the cherry picked words.

This is what Meghan did before. She capitalized on her acting role in Suits and made something more from it, and according to some newspaper reports, she had about $7million when she married into the RF. She’s now capitalizing on her show. Let her get on with it.

Ive since found a source and posted it on here that it says she was worth $5 million.

If it was just $2 million it was money she made herself through hard work.

??? You don’t?

Are they though? And isn’t your “they are both liars and fantasists” proof of the lens through which you view them.

Is there any action she could take that you could give wholesome praise for? Just one thing that wouldn’t be subject to snide criticism of action, her motivations, and what it demonstrates of her character?

I create threads. In fact I’ve created the thread which you have ‘contributed’ to this morning. No one is forcing you to.

You start these highly critical threads about Meghan. You make an only fans ‘ joke’ about Meghan, then add to it later, and think it’s all so merrily funny. And you think that people should just leave you to it and not object. Are you lost? This is mumsnet.

Yep. All the threads are like this 🥱

I think when everything is accounted for, they won’t have any more than £20/25 million from the deal.

I'd be amazed if they netted that much after production costs, taxes etc.

Even if they did, they aren't going to be getting lucrative media deals again, so whatever money they made from NF is going to have to last them a long time.

Where did you get that idea?

You could be right, I was being generous.

It’s certainly not 100 milion but don’t feel it would be as low as 10. I think maybe $20 million

From it being widely reported and being a long-standing rule of the RF….

Then don’t contribute to such a thread. Easy!