Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.

[AtIusvue]

Commissionable links- means when a potential customer clicks on the link, it's attributed to the affiliate, allowing the brand to record the source of the traffic. If someone buys a product using an affiliate link, the brand will pay the affiliate marketer commission on the sale

But she’s not an influencer?

This is really sad actually.

You’re correct though, this is MN, in the UK…..where people are allowed to gossip about celebs

Totally agree. Posters can post where they want, and if they disagree with something that someone says they are quite entitled to say they disagree! The only fans joke was really crass and having to take a screenshot of how many likes it got is pretty desperate. I get likes on my posts, sometimes quite a few, but I don't feel the need to boast about it 😂

This thread is unpleasant and sneery so it's not my thing to keep posting on it, (no need to worry OP I'm not hanging around!) it's just another thread of unpleasantness to go along with the hundreds of others and it's just bringing up the same old stuff, and not actually talking about the clothes

FWIW I really quite liked a lot of the outfits shown on her website, she didn't look like she was wearing jumble sale clothes 🙄, however I think you need to be thinner than me to wear quite a few of the pieces! I did however like the look of them, I thought they looked classy

It’s not disagreeing though is it- it’s chastising and public shaming of posts they don’t like @Extiainoiapeial

No one is forcing meghan fans to contribute to these awful threads

@IcedPurple didn’t agree with me that Harry and Meghan would have made X amount from their NF contract. A perfectly valid opinion, shared respectfully.

No, the rule applies to what is known as working members of the royal family. Those whose job it is to take part in royal family responsibilities.

Harry and Megan are no longer working members, so can do what they like with using the Sussex title, is my understanding. They had wanted a half and half whereby they were part time working royals and could do what they wanted for commercial projects the rest of the time, and this is what the Queen refused- they had to be in (working royals, no commercial activities) or out (not working royals and could do their own thing) and chose out.

Not correct.

She is a very divisive character. I can admire her Becky Sharp aspects, but do not like her lies, hypocrisy and, particularly, gross opportunism such as Uvalde. For those in denial, just check out her directing the photo opportunity…

I think Harry is contemptible. A weak weasel. He is the Duke of Windsor. At least Meghan saved him from the obvious fate of turning into Prince Andrew.

It's weird how I've now been called a "Meghan fan" after pointing out inaccuracies in OPs posts.

I'm a woman in her fifties who just finds this endless vitriol of a random young woman by (what I assume are other grown) women to be obsessive and quite creepy behaviour.

I'd love to know what jobs you all do that are contributing so much more to society. Or frankly why she shouldn't be hypocritical - she's not the Archbishop of Canterbury FGS. What are these weird standards you are holding her to? And why the relentless obsession?

It’s not disagreeing though is it- it’s chastising and public shaming of posts they don’t like

I'm sorry but the 'joke' you made deserved that. To me it was a very unpleasant and nasty thing to say. Women should not be making jokes like this about other women as far as I'm concerned. Just my opinion. I find it quite sad that you got all those likes to be honest.

No one is forcing meghan fans to contribute to these awful threads
Absolutely, which is why I said I'm not hanging around on here

Can I ask why do you care so much about a woman who lives halfway across the planet ?

If you don’t find the joke funny, that’s on you. Not me. Why should I care if you find it funny or not?

Because Meg has her insta commissions to get and a new podcast to promote…….avengers assemble!

You don't have to care. All I am doing is expressing an opinion, I thought the joke was really crass. You think it's funny. I don't. There's nothing more to say

I could be wrong but doesn’t the Duchy fund the Princes or is it called the Kings Trust?

Sad how?

You’re expressing it on a thread that you find awful, to a poster that you think makes awful jokes. That’s an awfully strange thing to do don’t you think?

Well quite - I hope next time OP has a business idea or work milestone that they get a bit more support that this random woman they revel in deriding.

This is what I thought.

I’ll give it 2 years

This is a forum people can comment on multiple threads rf related or not? So again what's your problem with people doing that? Are you implying somehow you are better than them because you don't and because you start threads?

The "why do you care about a woman you've never met" trope is a relatively new one to these discussions, isn't it?
Why does anyone care about anything? I don't "get" why my dh (and millions of others) obsess about football matches and results and positions in leagues and so forth. It doesn't interest me so I stay out of it and don't click on internet articles about it.
And vitriol? Point to any post on this thread that's who's vitriolic, please. If you want vitriol, go to Tattle. Discussion, observation and the calling out of hypocrisy is not the same as vitriol.
Try harder if you want to close down this discussion.

She’s not a random young woman. She’s not young and she’s not random. She’s someone who has put herself out there as an example to the rest of humanity in how to live. She trumpets her own superiority at every opportunity whilst not exemplifying any of the attributes she claims to uphold. She’s a very rich middle aged woman who has succeeded in marrying a very rich and stupid man . She’s not where she is due to any abilities of her own , yet she proclaims herself to be a feminist and a ‘humanitarian’ whilst causing misery to her husbands family and her own father . Of course people are going to follow her antics and have an opinion. She’s asked for it, in spadefulls. She also uses her Royal titles to gain advantage whilst undermining the ‘Institution’ that bestowed them at every opportunity. That pisses a lot of people off, Royalist or not.

And another posted did this originally - Cherry picked some of my words and not even included the full sentence so it looked like that was all I wrote. Why has that been pulled out of a full sentence of mine

Im sorry if my post looked as if I was cherry picking your words. It wasn’t my intention. My reply was only ever about what popped into my mind when I read that specific part of your post. The figure is what I read years ago and my ref to feet and legs was not that you’d added them. Only that the figure had become bigger as time went on.

eta - I can see why you thought I was cherry picking and that it looked as if I was saying rubbish to your post. I really wasn’t.

And yes, I agree. It’s money she earned herself.

There's a difference between being interested and being derangely obsessed, which most of the Meghan haters are. Thread after thread literally going on about the same thing over and over again. It's insane.