Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family
Thread gallery
34
SpreadingJammyTodgerLove · 05/03/2025 21:34

@User14March it's probably less about NDAs, and more about not wanting to have a public reputation as a potential troublemaker/whistleblower when you are looking for your next job.

Cynic17 · 05/03/2025 21:35

BasiliskStare · 05/03/2025 19:05

@Atlasvue - It’s as close as she can get to hawking her title without getting into trouble.She thinks she’s being smart. Exactly.

Though I note she was on the end credits as Meghan , Duchess of Sussex . OK she is , but a bit gauche I think. Jamie Lee Curtis is , by virtue of her husband being a Baron "The Lady Haden-Guest. Curtis does not use this title, saying, "it has nothing to do with me" . Good on her . & her acting career , philanthropy supporting causes etc , are way beyond Meghan. (and she's written children's books. ) I think she gave $1m in real money after the fires in January - not tarting around telling other people what to do on her website or having photo ops in affected areas. . She seems to have managed very well in her career without using a title-by-marriage. Difference is ( apart from attitude ) JLC doesn't need it. Meghan is so famous and had so many opportunities purely from her marriage.

I always find it baffling that she keeps using "Meghan, Duchess of Sussex" when this would actually be her title on divorce (in the same way as Fergie is Sarah, Duchess of York). Why has Harry not explained this to her?!

Fourecks · 05/03/2025 21:37

Stickystickysticky · 05/03/2025 20:17

I caught a bit of Lady C talking about surnames etc and I think I heard correctly, was reading this thread so not paying attention properly, that they can use Sussex as a surname, but I don't think Harry would want to be called Harry Sussex, wasn't he Harry Wales in the army?

Harry didn't have a title when he was in the army, so he could use his father's title as a surname. Once he got his own title (Sussex), he stopped being able to use Charles' title as a surname. He especially can't use Wales now because it's passed to William.

I thought jam was a common thing to have on pancakes but I'm not from the UK.

cinnamongirl123 · 05/03/2025 21:39

A thought: is Harry paying Netflix to give his bizarre wife this bizarre tv show? I can't think of any other reason why Netflix is taking part in this lunacy. Aside from having it in for Mrs Sussex big time!

smilesy · 05/03/2025 21:39

AtIusvue · 05/03/2025 20:55

It was undercooked. In the episode Meg says she’s likes it a bit soft in the middle….when she tries to cover clearly bringing it out of the oven too early and has already cut into it.

A little wobble is fine….but it was oozy.

Oozy? My mistake. Not surgery. She wants to be Dr Pimple Popper

Stickystickysticky · 05/03/2025 21:40

Cynic17 · 05/03/2025 21:35

I always find it baffling that she keeps using "Meghan, Duchess of Sussex" when this would actually be her title on divorce (in the same way as Fergie is Sarah, Duchess of York). Why has Harry not explained this to her?!

Harry, it would appear, has explained fuck all to her , curtsying to his grandmother, the titles of Prince and Princess and when they are given , the fact that they don't get paid to do walk abouts , the fact that they didn't have a secret wedding before the actual wedding etc etc

BigWillyLittleTodger · 05/03/2025 21:46

I don’t think anyone’s forgotten the bullying at all, Meghan seems to be immune from cancellation for some strange reason, she seems to have this wall of protection around her however many people she traumatises, if she was going to be cancelled it would have happened when the Hollywood Reporter printed their article and now because Meghan has literally served on a platter her fake, insincere, narcissistic personality in full glorious technicolour for the world to see and people have grasped the opportunity to vocalise what they really think about her, as I said Karma’s a bitch.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 05/03/2025 21:48

The Alice Waters episode is the cringiest thing I've ever watched.

IcedPurple · 05/03/2025 21:59

Cynic17 · 05/03/2025 21:35

I always find it baffling that she keeps using "Meghan, Duchess of Sussex" when this would actually be her title on divorce (in the same way as Fergie is Sarah, Duchess of York). Why has Harry not explained this to her?!

Why would she need Harry to explain this to her when any of us random folk on the internet know it?

She calls herself 'Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex' which isn't even the divorced style as that wouldn't have the 'the'. I think she does it so she can ensure her name is in there, as her correct title is simply 'the Duchess of Sussex'. It also gets around her 'agreement' not to use the HRH which I am sure neither is happy about.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 05/03/2025 21:59

"Has anyone in the world ever been so tickled by the sight of lettuces?"

Erm, no.

Because they are not unhinged.

IdaGlossop · 05/03/2025 22:00

AsEverATwat · 05/03/2025 18:01

@AtIusvue or anyone else who watched it did she really say in one of the episodes that even people who live in little flats can have her lifestyle?

It was worse than that. She said 'a piece of this' ie gathering the crumbs from beneath my table, serfs.

Cynic17 · 05/03/2025 22:01

Stickystickysticky · 05/03/2025 21:40

Harry, it would appear, has explained fuck all to her , curtsying to his grandmother, the titles of Prince and Princess and when they are given , the fact that they don't get paid to do walk abouts , the fact that they didn't have a secret wedding before the actual wedding etc etc

Very true! It's just that the title thing is so counter-intuitive for someone who keeps telling us how happily married she is 😂

IdaGlossop · 05/03/2025 22:10

SpreadingJammyTodgerLove · 05/03/2025 19:35

"Basic Bitch Box Recipes" would be a more catchy name for what she's flogging than "As Ever". And more accurate.

In the 1980s, Paula Yates said in some interview that the way to cheat at giving dinner parties was to buy ready-made dishes from M&S, tip them into fancy serving ware then trip outside in your posh frock to hide the packaging in the dustbin. Recalling this long-buried memory has made me realise that Meghan lacks a sense of irony. WLM could be a success - and a very different show - if she had the wit to take the p**s out of herself. As she has no sense of humour, the audience takes the piss out of her. Paula Yates could cook in a ballgown and it would be funny whereas Meghan floating about in hers, empty-handed at the end of a passage-way in her house, just looks ridiculous.

MissRoseDurward · 05/03/2025 22:11

I thought jam was a common thing to have on pancakes but I'm not from the UK.

On Pancake Day, which was yesterday, traditionally it's lemon juice and sugar in the UK. But I gather they were not pancakes but crepes, and I don't know what goes with those.

RecollectionsMayRealiseMyJamIsNotActuallyJam · 05/03/2025 22:14

I always find it baffling that she keeps using "Meghan, Duchess of Sussex" when this would actually be her title on divorce

I don't. I don't At All.

LivelyMintViper · 05/03/2025 22:18

User14March · 05/03/2025 21:30

If she really bullies ‘subordinates’ then someone will blow the whistle, surely? And why not already? NDAs postc Weinstein not what they were.

Or one could seal their revenge by smuggling the Benny Hill theme tune into her pretentious claptrap...

EsmaCannonball · 05/03/2025 22:20

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 05/03/2025 21:59

"Has anyone in the world ever been so tickled by the sight of lettuces?"

Erm, no.

Because they are not unhinged.

She invited Ken Dodd round? I might watch that episode.

Jacquettes · 05/03/2025 22:21

She was never HRH Princess Rachel Meghan because she is not a 'blood' royal. She was, and theoretically still is, HRH The Duchess of Sussex. She could go by Princess Henry if she wanted, but you can see why she doesn't!

I find this ‘royal blood’ stuff ridiculous. I know what you mean, and it’s used quite commonly but it really is just perpetuating an idea that there is something particularly special about these people. Other than being the descendants of some brutal dictators and some bloody nasty cunts, they are the same as everyone else. ‘descendants of monarchy’ or something like that would be better in my opinion:

I don't see that there would have been anything stopping feminist Meghan from keeping her own name. She was never even a British citizen, so could certainly have remained Rachel Meghan Markle on her American passport.

There nothing stopping her from
keeping her name but it sounds like she has chosen to use Sussex - to be the same name as her children. That does not mean she’s not a feminist. She’s been able to make the choice.

IdaGlossop · 05/03/2025 22:22

Stickystickysticky · 05/03/2025 18:27

This annoys me probably more than it should ! There are millions of families who share the same name , there are also millions who don't. Is she saying that they are more in love because they have the same name?
Its just another knobhead , meaningless piece of drivel.

I wonder if the insistence on Sussex is a way of hinting at an 'us four against the world' vibe so part of the victim mentality. King George V1 talked about 'We four' to refer to him, Elizabeth and their daughters, which is also a bit 'us against the world' although I doubt Meghan will have read back that far.

TheWayTheLightFalls · 05/03/2025 22:22

Shetlands · 05/03/2025 20:54

The purple ones look more like a painful case of piles.
(sorry)

She mentioned (twice possibly!) that the arch needed to account for a tree. So there’s the half-assed fruit kebab rainbow arch on one side of the tree, and then the haemorrhoid on the other. Obviously if there were actual children invited to the children’s garden party that arch would be down faster than a whore’s knickers but luckily the nanny’s handling them so that’s all good.

The Roy Choi episode was passable. I’m now midway through the Delfina Dog Biccie episode and losing the will a bit.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 05/03/2025 22:23

Also, why does she keep saying “fresh preserves”?

Anything preserved is not fresh by definition.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 05/03/2025 22:24

EsmaCannonball · 05/03/2025 22:20

She invited Ken Dodd round? I might watch that episode.

She’s just easily tickled.

IcedPurple · 05/03/2025 22:25

Jacquettes · 05/03/2025 22:21

She was never HRH Princess Rachel Meghan because she is not a 'blood' royal. She was, and theoretically still is, HRH The Duchess of Sussex. She could go by Princess Henry if she wanted, but you can see why she doesn't!

I find this ‘royal blood’ stuff ridiculous. I know what you mean, and it’s used quite commonly but it really is just perpetuating an idea that there is something particularly special about these people. Other than being the descendants of some brutal dictators and some bloody nasty cunts, they are the same as everyone else. ‘descendants of monarchy’ or something like that would be better in my opinion:

I don't see that there would have been anything stopping feminist Meghan from keeping her own name. She was never even a British citizen, so could certainly have remained Rachel Meghan Markle on her American passport.

There nothing stopping her from
keeping her name but it sounds like she has chosen to use Sussex - to be the same name as her children. That does not mean she’s not a feminist. She’s been able to make the choice.

I find this ‘royal blood’ stuff ridiculous. I know what you mean, and it’s used quite commonly but it really is just perpetuating an idea that there is something particularly special about these people.

I guess that's why Harry and Meghan cling so tightly to those titles and ensured that their children are Prince and Princess. It's obviously extremely important that everyone knows they're not just anyone!

There nothing stopping her from
keeping her name but it sounds like she has chosen to use Sussex - to be the same name as her children

Her children do not have the name 'Sussex'. According to their birth certs, they have the family name of Mountbatten Windsor.

BasiliskStare · 05/03/2025 22:27

From the GQ Article (Thanks @AtIusvue )

"But this isn't really about Markle. *
This is about the fact that a show as devoid of concept as this, as ignorable, was commissioned by Netflix at the expense of something better. It's about the opportunity cost of bankrolling blandness. "

I would love to be a fly on the wall in a meeting with those who came up with the initial contract. OK they wanted the exit story , but did they need to give H&M what seemed like a lot of money for a pretty woolly brief for further programmes Do you think they blinked first worried that someone else would get it ? It's annoying though that with Live to Lead the Invictus one and Polo NF must have pissed a lot of money up the wall ( I know it seems to be accepted H&M won't end up earning $100m ) but even so. Anora which won best picture Oscar only had a budget of $6m. OK that's not a fair comparison but I can't see H&M whether it be NF or another streaming company being offered such good terms again - if at all. But what do I know.

*cheekily I quite like the cut of the chap's jib - not only ignoring her saying she's changed her surname but not even using the Meghan she wants to keep. I really think as I've said before it will be a slow train coming people not thinking of her as Meghan Markle.

Mookie81 · 05/03/2025 22:31

I've noticed she cannot bear to be wrong or make a mistake.
When she's making the coffee creamer, and the bloke tells her it's boiling over she goes quiet, then has to say she thinks it's good and gets a bit funny. She couldn't just laugh it off as a silly mistake.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread