I'm not one of those who a) thinks the children don't exist or b) bangs on about 'let us see them!'. I have no interest in these (poor) children beyond wishing the best for them in unpromising circumstances.
But if Meghan and Harry are so famously determined to keep them out of the public eye then they should stop referencing them in speeches etc. You can't have it both ways. You can't expect us either to believe in, or to care about your family life if you make such a meal of keeping it top secret. And it's utterly irrelevant to Invictus.
And now I hear that Harry is determined to 'pass on the legacy of Invictus to Archie'. Well - where to start with this? Firstly - it's a bit sexist to leave it to Archie. What about Lili? Secondly - how ridiculously pompous and presumptious! This is what the RF do, and in their role it's perfectly reasonable. But Harry is no longer in that situation and despite what he'd like us to believe, Invictus does not belong to him. He can't dictate that it will pass on to his son - he's in the US now where royal blood and heredity doesn't mean a thing.
I would like to hope that by the time Archie is in his 30s there won't be a need for Invictus because there will be no more wars. Ha ha. I know, but if only....
These two are reaching the point where you couldn't satirise them - their behaviour is already more ridiculous than fiction.