Yes of course I do. And, once again, you are wrong, particularly in this statement: "You really think it takes a genius to work that out? When the police realised her phone had been hacked it was all over the press for weeks."
Whatever Surrey police suspected or knew in 2002 (when Milly disappeared) about the NOTW accessing her phone (and theirs for that matter), they did nothing about it, no investigation, no follow up, no prosecution and no public statements about hacking. In fact, senior officers met up wit the NOTW to discuss he case with them. A report into Surrey police's failure to report hacking was submitted to Leveson. As was reported in 2012 in the Telegraph:
Surrey Police knew in April 2002 that the tabloid had illegally accessed the schoolgirl’s mobile phone messages, but instead of pressing charges a senior officer from the force invited two News of the World staff to a private meeting at the force’s headquarters to discuss the case.
Up to three other police forces were also aware of the hacking by the News of the World, but they did nothing until newspapers reported it last July [ie July 2011].
MPs said the Surrey force now had “serious questions” to answer about its response, and suggested the force could have prevented phone-hacking “becoming endemic” at the News of the World if it had acted sooner.
The police report, which has been submitted to the Leveson Inquiry, does not name the News of the World journalists who discussed voicemails with its officers, nor does it name the officers and press officers who knew about it.
But officers from Sussex Police, who reviewed the case in 2002, also failed to do anything about the hacking. The report implies that West Mercia police would also have been told about it, but it does not say whether the Metropolitan Police, which worked closely with Surrey on the case, was told.
So, no, the police involved with Milly Dowler's disappearance in 2002 were not going to be the party to reveal or investigate phone hacking.
So, one again, what got the ball rolling was William in 2005 reporting his security concern to the MET police. The Met consulted with the phone companies who had no idea hacking was possible, but established that it could be done. They traced calls made to staff voicemails to Clive Goodman's phone and to private investigator, Glenn Mulcair, who were prosecuted and were jailed in 2007. Phone hacking was officially identified as something that could be done and that was done. At that stage, the only publicly known victim was the royals.
The Guardian established the hacking of Milly's phone when they went through the notes of Glenn Mulcair in their 2009 investigation of the NOTW.
The Guardian looked at his thousands of notes (something once again the police appear to have failed to do) and found his hacking logs on Milly and others. The Guardian investigation prompted a number of civil suits, which in turn prompted the Met to re-open their investigations under the Weeting Inquiry. The Weeting Inquiry publicly confirmed in July 2011 that Milly Dowler had been a victim of hacking as the Guardian had established 2 years earlier. That was when the public outcry ensued and the Leveson Inquiry ordered. 2011, and at no time before 2005.