Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

ARO update

528 replies

Sunblessed · 27/11/2024 21:28

At the end of August, there was a partial rejection of the ARO trademark because of the name and descriptions. Also issues with the logo.
They had 3 months to rectify, which you would think would be ample time.

But just a few days before the deadline, an extension has been applied for. Which would be another 3 months

So it’s obviously not an easy fix, I’m sure there have been countless people working to get this done and they have months! Yet they’ve not been able to sort it.

Seemingly, you are only allowed one extension. This would take her to the end of February. So pretty much a year since she’s launched and it’s no further forward, if anything she’s in a worse position. What a disaster.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
OneTealSloth · 30/11/2024 14:22

Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:19

A company that launched 9 months ago, have had a refusal over the name they’ve tried to TM and have zero products. No income, no turnover, no profits.

It’s an unmitigated disaster.

Some people just can’t accept reality and are very very upset about it

The only one not accepting reality here is you I’m afraid. Your over exaggerations are somewhat amusing.

A disaster would be products with no sales. Not the standard back and forths with trademarking.

Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:23

They won’t get the TM and it’s very upsetting to some people but also very amusing

OP posts:
Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:24

Perhaps the poster should start a thread about c&w and their TM woes…..oh wait. but that doesn’t get the attention does it

OP posts:
OneTealSloth · 30/11/2024 14:27

Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:24

Perhaps the poster should start a thread about c&w and their TM woes…..oh wait. but that doesn’t get the attention does it

You made yourself the trademark monitor to gloat about a trademark refusal that is not real.

Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:28

I’ve never mentioned gloating. That seems to be your area of expertise, you even mentioned it’s why you are here

OP posts:
EdithWeston · 30/11/2024 14:28

OneTealSloth · 30/11/2024 10:57

For those wanting proof of other american riviera trademarks.

You are allowed to use geographical locations if

  • your business is physically located in that location (ARO isn't, it's in Montecito)
  • it is predominantly selling goods that are made in that location (wasn't one of the things ARO was bounced for was insufficient information on the products)

Also there are examples of long established firms who were trading long before these stipulations coming in who can continue.

OneTealSloth · 30/11/2024 14:29

Thedom · 30/11/2024 14:22

I think William and Catherine applied for the trademark PRIOR to registering their foundation in the US, I imagine that would be the normal way to do things, just so you don't look like you don't know WFT you are doing. Makes more sense to do it that way to iron out any potential issues in advance.

Moot. The point is that trademarks are rarely straightforward. William and Kate got a full refusal and managed to overturn it. Meghan has got a partial refusal and OP is dancing on the grave of a company that isn’t selling yet.

Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:30

The TM has had a refusal over the geo description of the name

You chose to live in what reality you want but I’ll stick to the facts and the actual truth. You can live in H&Ms world where only ‘feelings’ and ‘your truth’ count

OP posts:
OneTealSloth · 30/11/2024 14:30

EdithWeston · 30/11/2024 14:28

You are allowed to use geographical locations if

  • your business is physically located in that location (ARO isn't, it's in Montecito)
  • it is predominantly selling goods that are made in that location (wasn't one of the things ARO was bounced for was insufficient information on the products)

Also there are examples of long established firms who were trading long before these stipulations coming in who can continue.

Meghan can remedy these issues with a disclaimer about locations and classifying of the goods.

OneTealSloth · 30/11/2024 14:31

Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:30

The TM has had a refusal over the geo description of the name

You chose to live in what reality you want but I’ll stick to the facts and the actual truth. You can live in H&Ms world where only ‘feelings’ and ‘your truth’ count

And you can live in a reality that does not exist yet. The hard fact of the matter is that the trademark is PENDING.

Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:32

And what possible disclaimer can you put to remedy the the geo description?

You can’t. That’s why in 3 months they haven’t been able to come up with a solution- why? Because there isn’t a way round it.

OP posts:
Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:34

The TM has had a partial refusal, one in which they will not remedy. Therefore it will be refused.

It’s why they haven’t issued any correction in 3 whole months, because there is none to make.

The idea that it will be granted is hilarious

OP posts:
OneTealSloth · 30/11/2024 14:34

Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:32

And what possible disclaimer can you put to remedy the the geo description?

You can’t. That’s why in 3 months they haven’t been able to come up with a solution- why? Because there isn’t a way round it.

The disclaimer that the examiner themselves recommended 🤷🏽‍♀️

Its right there in the documents.

American Riviera Orchard will be live in 2025 🙂

Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:35

Uh huh- so what does it say? Tell us how they can possibly remedy the name. If it’s all there? 😂

OP posts:
OneTealSloth · 30/11/2024 14:35

Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:34

The TM has had a partial refusal, one in which they will not remedy. Therefore it will be refused.

It’s why they haven’t issued any correction in 3 whole months, because there is none to make.

The idea that it will be granted is hilarious

If there was no remedy, there would be no chance to respond 😂

I can’t wait to celebrate the launch of ARO in 2025 ☺️

OneTealSloth · 30/11/2024 14:36

Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:35

Uh huh- so what does it say? Tell us how they can possibly remedy the name. If it’s all there? 😂

I believe I pasted it a few pages behind.

Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:38

So if they were told how to remedy by the examiner, why didn’t they in the 3 months given and why do they need a further 3 months? If the answer is already there 😂

Because it’s untrue. They can’t remedy at all. ARO is toast

OP posts:
OneTealSloth · 30/11/2024 14:40

@Sunblessed copied from the non final notice

Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:

No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “AMERICAN RIVIERA” apart from the
mark as shown.

Meghan can use “American Riviera Orchard” and not “American Riviera” which she’s not asking to use anyway.

The other issues were with good classifications and logos I think

BunnyLake · 30/11/2024 14:40

OneTealSloth · 30/11/2024 14:34

The disclaimer that the examiner themselves recommended 🤷🏽‍♀️

Its right there in the documents.

American Riviera Orchard will be live in 2025 🙂

You'll have to let us all know what the jam is like and if you’ve got a dog does it like the biscuits. I won’t be buying but if they’ve enough dedicated fans like yourself putting your hand in your pocket regularly I’m sure it will do well.

Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:40

Then tell us specifically what they can do to remedy the geo description?

surely that’s an easy one to solve?

Then you should really tell meghan, she hasn’t been able to come up with one in 3 months and has now resorted to having to get an extension.

All this impacting when she can launch. Time is money and all that.

who knew that a poster on MN had the answer

OP posts:
OneTealSloth · 30/11/2024 14:41

Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:40

Then tell us specifically what they can do to remedy the geo description?

surely that’s an easy one to solve?

Then you should really tell meghan, she hasn’t been able to come up with one in 3 months and has now resorted to having to get an extension.

All this impacting when she can launch. Time is money and all that.

who knew that a poster on MN had the answer

Meghan is in no rush. Trademark monitors and disaster predictionists will continue to obsessed with it.

isitsnowingyett · 30/11/2024 14:42

@OneTealSloth

"It’s the faux concern over the children of a man and woman they mock and abuse everyday.

Using that same fake concern to cast aspersions. That’s what I find ugly."

Did you find it ugly when Harry showed concern about his brother, his marriage and children? Or was that OK?

OneTealSloth · 30/11/2024 14:42

BunnyLake · 30/11/2024 14:40

You'll have to let us all know what the jam is like and if you’ve got a dog does it like the biscuits. I won’t be buying but if they’ve enough dedicated fans like yourself putting your hand in your pocket regularly I’m sure it will do well.

I hope it does well 🙏🏽

Will let you know if you genuinely care lol

Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:43

So what’s the answer then if it’s just a simple disclaimer?

If it’s so simple, then why hasn’t Meghan sorted it? 🤔

OP posts:
Sunblessed · 30/11/2024 14:45

See no answer

Post after post and zero answers. Cringeworthy

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread