Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry’s anxiety in NY

1000 replies

Makingwaves2 · 23/09/2024 20:13

What to make of the fact that he appeared without Meghan and looked quite anxious and stressed?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
StrawberryWasp · 29/09/2024 18:58

Tbf to M she did try to focus back on the parents instead of herself when asked the question about her experience.

But I don't think that's because she empathised with them, it's because she knows she's on dodgy ground with her story.

What I'd like someone to ask her is: I understand you spoke about your own experience to help others going through similar, could you tell us about the help you got, how it supported you and your journey back to good mental health so that people listening can see a hopeful path if they seek help?

Why won't she talk about the help she got if she wants to remove stigma and help others?

We know why.
Because she didn't get any help.

My guess is that that evening she was upset and told Harry she sometimes wishes she wasn't there. This was a passing emotion in a difficult situation and she was able to rally and go out for the evening.

This incident is now dressed as 'being suicidal' in a horrible attempt to exaggerate her distress. Dangerously ignoring the real difference between severe depression and ideation and passing heightened emotions.

But now she's stuck with the exaggerated story she told and it doesn't add up because the emotion/ thought didn't persist and she didn't get any help.

Needanewname42 · 29/09/2024 19:08

Remember it was all a story about needing to 'go somewhere' and the RF didn't arrange it.
Plus all the nonsense about going to the HR Dept.

If you think of it as a 'family business' HR is there to support the employees on behalf of the family/directors.

H&M are the equivalent of directors. Why would they not arrange these things themselves?

It just doesn't make any sense. It's completely nonsense

Puzzledandpissedoff · 29/09/2024 19:12

Tbf to M she did try to focus back on the parents instead of herself when asked the question about her experience
But I don't think that's because she empathised with them, it's because she knows she's on dodgy ground with her story

Exactly, @StrawberryWasp. Focusing on others would be an admirable thing to do, except that the whole thing falls apart because it simply isn't her usual approach

So all that's left is to think she did it to cover up her own lack of credibility, in which case it lookss even worse

On a separate note though, I'm wondering why this bit of the interview has just been released when AFAIK it hadn't previously been seen

Hughs · 29/09/2024 19:30

But now she's stuck with the exaggerated story she told and it doesn't add up because the emotion/ thought didn't persist and she didn't get any help.

I'm sure she also doesn't mind the parallels with Diana.

Alectoishome · 29/09/2024 19:31

Uricon2 · 29/09/2024 16:46

It's one of the many reasons why the Diana cosplay jars so much. Of all the hundreds of thousands of photos and films there must be of her, sometimes taken by a hostile media, I defy anyone to find an occasion where she comes over as badly as Harry and Meghan do with monotonous regularity. Of course, not being obsessed with the sound of her own voice spreading "wisdom" helped enormously.

Yes its turns my stomach when Harry constantly compares Meghan to his mother. Diana was flawed and made mistakes but the mitigating circumstances of her marriage, age etc were very different and she absolutely did genuinely care for others suffering. Watching footage of her in her charity and activism work, you can truly see her heart was in it. I am not one of those people who idolise Diana, but she had a loving, kind heart.
Wheras any contact Meghan has had with people via charities, Royal duties, public appearances etc is SO patently performative and hollow that it's awkward to watch. It's so ironic that she was an actress because actually she cannot act convincingly at all.

SqueakyDinosaur · 29/09/2024 19:33

Diana also gave Royal life 15 years. Meghan didn't.

justasking111 · 29/09/2024 19:48

Diana had such a different upbringing to Meghan. Handling people comes more naturally when you're raised with noblesse oblige.

A kind heart is an added advantage.

BigAnne · 29/09/2024 19:50

@Rhaidimiddim There's a definite link here. She's picked on the wrong person this time.

Alectoishome · 29/09/2024 19:52

BigAnne · 29/09/2024 19:50

@Rhaidimiddim There's a definite link here. She's picked on the wrong person this time.

I suppose it was inevitable in the end that she would.

BruFord · 29/09/2024 20:06

Alectoishome · 29/09/2024 19:31

Yes its turns my stomach when Harry constantly compares Meghan to his mother. Diana was flawed and made mistakes but the mitigating circumstances of her marriage, age etc were very different and she absolutely did genuinely care for others suffering. Watching footage of her in her charity and activism work, you can truly see her heart was in it. I am not one of those people who idolise Diana, but she had a loving, kind heart.
Wheras any contact Meghan has had with people via charities, Royal duties, public appearances etc is SO patently performative and hollow that it's awkward to watch. It's so ironic that she was an actress because actually she cannot act convincingly at all.

@Alectoishome It’s ridiculous, isn’t it, they were/are such different people. Diana had just turned 20 when she married Charles and she’d previously worked with young children. The marriage was arranged simply because she was “suitable” and she grew into the role. She’d probably have been happier with a more ordinary life, though.

Whereas Meghan has always wanted to be in the public eye, hence her chosen career path. She could’ve been successful out of the limelight, but she wants to be in it. I don't think Harry wants to admit that he was a means to that end.

Norahh · 29/09/2024 22:10

StrawberryWasp · 29/09/2024 18:58

Tbf to M she did try to focus back on the parents instead of herself when asked the question about her experience.

But I don't think that's because she empathised with them, it's because she knows she's on dodgy ground with her story.

What I'd like someone to ask her is: I understand you spoke about your own experience to help others going through similar, could you tell us about the help you got, how it supported you and your journey back to good mental health so that people listening can see a hopeful path if they seek help?

Why won't she talk about the help she got if she wants to remove stigma and help others?

We know why.
Because she didn't get any help.

My guess is that that evening she was upset and told Harry she sometimes wishes she wasn't there. This was a passing emotion in a difficult situation and she was able to rally and go out for the evening.

This incident is now dressed as 'being suicidal' in a horrible attempt to exaggerate her distress. Dangerously ignoring the real difference between severe depression and ideation and passing heightened emotions.

But now she's stuck with the exaggerated story she told and it doesn't add up because the emotion/ thought didn't persist and she didn't get any help.

What I'd like someone to ask her is: I understand you spoke about your own experience to help others going through similar, could you tell us about the help you got, how it supported you and your journey back to good mental health so that people listening can see a hopeful path if they seek help?

Or:

'....could you tell us about the help you got, how it supported you and your journey to NYC a fortnight later where you lived it up with a ton of celebs for your weekend babyshower?

Amazing turnaround.

yesmen · 29/09/2024 23:04

Alectoishome · 29/09/2024 16:17

That clip is horrendous. I feel the interviewer has some contempt in her face which she was working to hide. I don't go in for the 'poor Harry' stuff but it is a reminder that she had him by the balls - threatening to end her life and that of his unborn child.
I was waiting for her claw to grip his knee when he started fidgeting, low and behold - down it came like an iron vice.
Her self-satisfied smiles and self-absorbed dialogue is chilling when juxtaposed with the bereaved parents beside her, whom she is completely indifferent to. Their lives have been destroyed and you can tell there is no compassion there at all.

Edited

threatening to end her life and that of his unborn child.

This is a very fiucked up thing to say about a woman who suffered depression during pregnancy and was suicidal because of it - largely due to an avanlanche of agressively negative press coverage, on line harassement, and lets face it, thread like these.

Because this thread, among the gazillion others on Mumsnet about them, revels in any potiential pain or unhappiness these two suffer, and in the absense of that activily hope for it.

She seems quite gracious to me in the clip, clearly wanting to shift the focus to the families who have lost children to suicide due to soicail media.

PH does indeed seem uncomfortable but to my untrained eye it seemed more about the interviewer trying to go back over well covered ground rather than focus on their initiative.

yesmen · 29/09/2024 23:08

Makingwaves2 · 29/09/2024 16:37

There was also that occasion when M and H attended a garden party with Charles and Camilla. They suddenly left because apparently Meghan was just bored and had had enough.

This kind of reasoning seriously makes lives difficult to live.

How do you know it was a sudden departure as against a planned leaving time?

If you have the proof of that you then need proof that they left sue to her boredome and not some other reason.

Life is short to fall into these crazy arse hypothesee.

yesmen · 29/09/2024 23:12

Alectoishome · 29/09/2024 16:43

I've never heard another case where someone falls deeply in love (apparently), finally achieves success beyond their wildest dreams after a long, slow slog up the greasy pole in pursuit of status, money and power, to conceive their first child and to only THEN suddenly decide to end theirs and their child's life, becuase of some negative press and family disputes, with no previous history of depression. And then be absolutely fine again shortly after. And during this time they never lost motivation or interest in their own personal/best interests, their personal appearance, clothes, future plans and plots and contracts aplenty. It goes against everything I've ever heard and read and experienced (I had peri-natal depression for 3/6 pregnancies).
If it was made up, and only she can ever know for sure, then she is utterly wicked.

Strangely the person who made me the most suspicious of her claims was Doria. When Doria was being asked on the NF doc about seeing her daughter suffering at that time, something about her response just set my intuition off and I thought 'she knows it's BS.' But being her mother, and having done very nicely out of it herself, I'm sure she's able to justify it. She must be delighted with the life her daughter and grandchildren have and who can blame her for that.

Edited

Her child was compared to chimpanzee.

They had plenty of cause. The racisim in this country raised it's ugly head and hounded the two of them.

The lack of push back in that regard from government, palace and civil institions is a shameful stain for us.

Except all those wonderful female politicians who were the only ones to show some moral courage.

yesmen · 29/09/2024 23:13

Mylovelygreendress · 29/09/2024 17:12

It was reported that Meghan was furious and had a rant at JP after the interview.

Where?

yesmen · 29/09/2024 23:17

Rhaidimiddim · 29/09/2024 18:58

But only now are we allowed to say this. So many of us, it appears, with our own experiences spotted straightaway that this was more like a classic narc "do what I want or I'll kill myself" move. How come we weren't allowed to say what we saw!?

This is absolutely disgraceful.

Shame on you.

Unless you had direct dealings with them at the time, are a qualified shrink and can produce evidence. In that case, I would love to read it, and no, you would not deserve shame.

forevernumb · 29/09/2024 23:45

@yesmen the point is that you don't have a clearer picture of it than anyone else and everyone is allowed to air their opinions.

Runnerinthenight · 30/09/2024 00:11

Coruscations · 28/09/2024 14:09

CEOs have to do a hell of a lot more than younger members of the RF.

Exactly, that was my point!

Vespanest · 30/09/2024 00:21

The suicidal ideation is not something I would personally question but there is only one villain in the recounting of it is the pathetic excuse of a husband that failed to help his wife whilst finger pointing the blame onto others. Archie is the victim in this having this known and his father was as useful as a chocolate teapot.

Runnerinthenight · 30/09/2024 00:50

yesmen · 29/09/2024 23:04

threatening to end her life and that of his unborn child.

This is a very fiucked up thing to say about a woman who suffered depression during pregnancy and was suicidal because of it - largely due to an avanlanche of agressively negative press coverage, on line harassement, and lets face it, thread like these.

Because this thread, among the gazillion others on Mumsnet about them, revels in any potiential pain or unhappiness these two suffer, and in the absense of that activily hope for it.

She seems quite gracious to me in the clip, clearly wanting to shift the focus to the families who have lost children to suicide due to soicail media.

PH does indeed seem uncomfortable but to my untrained eye it seemed more about the interviewer trying to go back over well covered ground rather than focus on their initiative.

I'm sorry but I don't believe her.

yesmen · 30/09/2024 01:00

@Runnerinthenight "I'm sorry but I don't believe her" is quite different from accusating someone of threatening their nearest with the murder of the unborn child and their own suicide, in order to have control.

This is what "threatening to end her life and that of his unborn child" means.

It seems incredibly difficult to defend.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 30/09/2024 01:02

yesmen · 29/09/2024 23:17

This is absolutely disgraceful.

Shame on you.

Unless you had direct dealings with them at the time, are a qualified shrink and can produce evidence. In that case, I would love to read it, and no, you would not deserve shame.

I agree with @Rhaidimiddim and give over with the shame on you shtick it doesn’t wash here. I never believed a word of it either, I don’t doubt she said it to Harry, just like controlling men who threaten suicide if their wives attempt to leave them, suicide threat can be a form of control, funny how it mirrored Diana’s threat to throw herself down the stairs when pregnant with William, it’s almost as if she had read Andrew Moreton’s book Diana, her true story.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 30/09/2024 01:03

Except all those wonderful female politicians who were the only ones to show some moral courage.

Yet strangely silent now her true colours have been revealed for the world to see.

yesmen · 30/09/2024 01:05

Well @BigWillyLittleTodger , I do find those statements, expressed in that way, shameful.

You don't.

We will not agree.

yesmen · 30/09/2024 01:06

BigWillyLittleTodger · 30/09/2024 01:03

Except all those wonderful female politicians who were the only ones to show some moral courage.

Yet strangely silent now her true colours have been revealed for the world to see.

Well no actually.

It is becuase she is no loinger a resident of our country.

It would be a bit bloody weird for them to keep on at it now that she has left.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.