Very few of you will like this reply but honestly, the prevailing view on this thread that “everything H & M does is terrible, mendacious and bullying” and “everything the RF does is perfect” is ridiculously simplistic!
The RF are protected to some extent by the establishment bubble, but does no one remember Prince Philip’s racial slurs, how Princess Anne’s dog attacked two boys, bit the ear off another dog out hunting and attacked a housemaid’s knee? (Can you imagine the outrage now if Meghan’s dog had done that?) Princess Anne was allegedly rude to someone who gave her flowers.
And let’s not dwell on Prince Andrew or how Sophie and Fergie tried to sell exclusive access to the RF for cash! Or when Edward was spoiled and petulant with reporters?
I doubt very much that Princess Anne is all smiles and white doves when it comes to business matters and why should she be? Nor the late Queen for that matter!
Perhaps there’s no bad reports from Meghan’s behaviour during her time acting in Suits because she behaved well during that time? Like Prince Philip and Princess Anne, Edward and Sophie also had and have good sides to their personalities too.
My point is, I find it faintly ridiculous that all side is one thing and the other side is the exact opposite. Life experience surely tells you that most people are a blend of good and bad?
In the context of the outrageous egos in Hollywood, Elton John having had quite a big ego himself at one point, Meghan’s personality is probably no better or worse than many of them!
Above all, I wish we could focus our attention away from ALL of these privileged folk on both sides of the argument and look a bit more closely at the under-privileged sections of society who could actually do with more people focusing on them and their issues.
Up the (peaceful) revolution!