What exactly is "the Sussex Squad"?

[Prydddan]

I don't know whether this is too controversial a topic for such a thread to be allowed to stand. But I post in good faith on a topic I believe has a lot of social and political relevance.

Does the "Sussex Squad" actually exist? If so, how do you join? If not, do people ever identify as belonging to it?

If it exists, was it hijacked by SarahData and Bouzy or was it their creation? And, if so, to what extent?

Thanks in advance.

What in his latest statement about the Sussex Squad is incorrect?

I'm not after a litany of past woes, but his recent account of the activities of the Sussex Squad

I think he’s shown there is is a clear connection between the Sussex Squad and The Sussexes. Is that fair?

Exactly, @AliceOlive - imagine putting the privilege of multimillionaire royals above vulnerable African people people harmed by African Parks. Unbelievable.

@Mylovelygreendress Please don't take my itinerary. I am not hetup. Like the majority of us when we see anything to do with H & M and now it's been aimed at the Sussex Squad and supporters we take a stand which is our right.

Unfortunately @CoffeeCantata there are posts on here which are snidey and it's what I expected. I have had my say. I doubt what I will say will change your minds anymore than you will change mine.

The general SS are not what some seem to think they are. Why people ask do we go into bat for them. Because we became sick of seeing the same vitriol and lies day in day out.

The racism is proven. I haven't got the time or energy to link you to every single thing I can say.

As for comments I've made about certain things that are supposed to be happening between W & K, those rumours have come from the press originally. The press created this.

They were a throw back of all the rubbish chucked at H & M day in and day out. .

100s of thousands of press articles (yes there is) books written about them and they haven't even been interviewed for these books.

H & M response to all of that was to tell there side of the story. No one is saying they are perfect as no one is. Neither is the RF though the way people carry on you would think they were.

The 100s and 100s of bots who are released through whatever means of the media to trash them is why the SS started. No one denying there has been some infiltration however damning us as terrorist group etc etc. is beyond.

You all need to realise in your daily/weekly sum up you will see the worst of it. There is evidence out there to the racism and the daily death threats. There is evidence from the police themselves and also those who have threatened them.

We have the receipts of all of it. No to answer the one question: you don't get scrutinized to join etc. etc. You just make yourself known that you are with them in support.

I'm going to leave you with one video stream to listen too That is just the tip of the iceberg. Have a good day all as this is my last reply. You can carry on slating us as you don't know the first thing about any of us. Take good care

https://x.com/factsand2cents/status/1601573321346527233

This is why ascribing racism to the valid criticism of H&M does not hit the mark.

One cannot convincingly pretend to care about racism while ignoring the horrific racist abuse of a group of vulnerable people at the hands of one of Harry’s pet foundations.

SS are all over every event connected with H&M. Every bit of news that is reported, everything article of clothing. They can’t have missed this scandal yet you will not find a peep about it in this their Twitter feeds.

What do you have to say about African Parks? I’m interested in that.

I thought you’d gone?

But I think we know enough.

Folk are not as invisible as they think they are on line.

Do the SS know nothing? It started with Wooten and his Turnip Toffs fall out article and implications that Catherine was demanding Rose be excluded from their social circle. This was quickly dropped by the UK press for having no basis in reality and being potentially libelous. Not so the American press who were happy to bang on about it. Guardian journalist, Hadley Freeman tweeted asking what it was all about. Giles Coren - fresh from a drunken lunch - posted a clearly absurd reply saying that everyone knows it's about an affair. This stupid tweet went viral. This was picked up by an SS twitter blue tick, who decided to create a story around it, saying that the dog bowl incident in Spare was a fight over the affair. This again went viral, GC was rebranded as a royal commentator, and this made up story was repeated here by many posters, including the odd stalwart. A couple of years later, Giles Coren made it very clear and keeps making it clear that he made the whole thing up and doesn't know the people involved and is not part of their circle. The SS twitter blue tick also back pedaled furiously after GC reneged. It all came up again in the run up to the publication of Endgame and Omid Scobie mentioning it that book (and even he says there's no evidence). When Stephen Colbert made his vicious and unfunny "joke" about it last month, Rose's lawyers made it very clear that it was made up and threatened legal action.

He's not the only one that said about william and rose

Everyone else saying it is getting it from the original source (Wooten, whom you accept is a liar), the original liar (Coren, who has admitted he's a liar on this issue) and the original fantasist (the Twitter blue tick with the made up fantasy that tied in with Spare/dog bowlgate).

Not a single royal author who has written a book, positive or negative, on the RF in the last few years has found any evidence of an affair, and yes, they have looked. And yet, the SS persist in spreading this disgusting rumour that drags innocent children into the spotlight. Do you feel good about yourself doing that?

Whose racism is proven?

It also surprises me that you are speaking in the plural.

Is that because of safety in numbers, a party line or a lack of conviction to have an opinion of your own?

Because we became sick of seeing the same vitriol and lies day in day out.

I see far more vitriol and lies coming from that organisation you say you support. Why is that ok?

And again, what are your thoughts about African Parks?

Because we became sick of seeing the same vitriol and lies day in day out.

Get another hobby, then; because this one sounds like it's bad for your health.

Who's 'we'?

Not a single royal author who has written a book, positive or negative, on the RF in the last few years has found any evidence of an affair, and yes, they have looked. And yet, the SS persist in spreading this disgusting rumour that drags innocent children into the spotlight. Do you feel good about yourself doing that?

Very true. And keffie12 posted above:

“those rumours have come from the press originally. The press created this.

They were a throw back of all the rubbish chucked at H & M day in and day out.”

Which sounds a lot like an admission that, having seen the original “Rural Rivals” story, this was seized on maliciously by people such as keffie12 to “chuck rubbish” at William and Kate instead of their “faves”.

Even under the US’s very broad First Amendment, maliciously spreading falsehoods is illegal…

We have the receipts of all of it. No to answer the one question: you don't get scrutinized to join etc. etc. You just make yourself known that you are with them in support

Oh right. So there IS an organised movement rather than just online fandom. Who do you make yourself known to, is there a secret knock and a codeword?

My goodness, it all sounds very Secret Seven.

Another departure announcement? How many is that?

I think we've got the teenager wing of the squad posting today. Must be the section that you join for free with limited access to the privileges but get pushed onto SM to go over the top with the defence. A bit like the poor bloody infantry on the first day of the Somme.

100s of thousands of press articles (yes there is) books written about them and they haven't even been interviewed for these books.

How many books does keffie12 think have been written about Queen Elizabeth II, her life, her marriage, her reign, her children, over the course of her 96-plus years life? How many thousands of global press articles? How many movies and tv shows even? How many of these did she participate in?

I don’t recall the Queen talking to Oprah, or writing Spare though, or doing anything that confirmed that some of the more unattractive rumours were in fact true.

We have the receipts of all of it.

@keffie12 Why don't you show them instead of talking incessantly about having them while spreading unsubstantiated rumours?

I don't think keffie12 has heard the term 'unauthorised biography'; or that you don't need to interview someone to write about them, as Serenster pointed out. Nor do you need their permission.

I would be quite worried if I was in anyway affiliated with the so called Sussex Squad, silly girl crush fandom can be ignored, but an organisation that tries to undermine our constitution and our Country by nefarious actions is something I imagine our Security Services will be monitoring closely.

@keffie12
“Mylovelygreendress Please don't take my itinerary. I am not hetup. “

Not sure what you mean by your first sentence ?
If you say you’re not het up , so be it but you do a good impression of someone who is VERY het up .
What’s your view of the African Parks scandal ?
By the way , H and M flounced off when they couldn’t get their own way - he didn’t have to take her away because of the evil U.K.

Keffie, you wrote 'Nor were any of us badmouthing Kate. There was a lot of concern for where she was. Being concerned is not the same as bad mouthing.'

But then you proceeded to write 'When W appears with K rarely these days, they are as cold as ice, and the anger K has to him is evil, though I'm not surprised.'

Not badmouthing? I'd hate to see what you write when you are 'badmouthing'.

I wonder if they have posters on their bedroom walls? those were mandatory when I was doing the silly girl crush fandom thing.