Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

american riviera orchard - what was that all about then?

1000 replies

Tenmus · 29/03/2024 13:06

It seems to have gone the same way as their Sussex Royal site. I don't know much about social media or PR, but this all seems pretty odd and ineffectual.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
Theraininspainfalls · 05/04/2024 13:45

Serenster · 05/04/2024 13:41

I agree with a lot if what you posted, but I think it has emerged that Harry is also an entitled bully.

Harry wrote in Spare about his protection officer (“Billy”):

When Billy the Rock escorted me back to the hotel, I tried to pick a fight with him. I growled at him, swung on him, slapped his head. He barely reacted. He just frowned like an ultra-patient parent. I slapped him again. I loved him but I was determined to hurt him. He’d seen me like this before. Once, maybe twice. I heard him say to another bodyguard, ‘He’s a handful tonight'.

Photos also exist of Harry lunging at photographers.

And, just a reminder, the judgement in Harry’s case against RAVEC which came out in February recorded that Harry had thrown his weight around, looking for an individual he could “blame” for declining him permanent security: “[Prince Harry] asked who would be willing to put him and his family in a position of extreme vulnerability and risk …“ I would like that person’s name who is willing to take accountability for this choice please …”.

Imagine writing that about yourself yet not feeling deep shame. It’s just mind boggling .

Serenster · 05/04/2024 13:46

Also, on keeping the investigation report confidential, this is completely normal. ACAS’s guidelines on this are in the screenshot below.

Given that Buckingham Palace were rightly being criticised for not having appropriate processes to protect their staff from bullying, it was clearly in the public interest for them to announce that they had instructed an independent third party to undertake an investigation. At the end of the process they then announced that recommendations had been made and acted on. Despite the public being greatly interested in the content for he report, that however contained individual’s private information, that rightly stays private.

american riviera orchard - what was that all about then?
themessygarden · 05/04/2024 13:46

Harry did get to claim in his book that his wife was unfairly depicted as a bully, and that they exposed the 'lie' with a 25 page rebuttal.

The employees, who were silenced because of NDA's , never got to contest Harry accusing them of lying about being bullied. It must be a bitter pill to have to swallow.

Chupacabara · 05/04/2024 13:51

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

shenandoahvalley · 05/04/2024 13:52

There's a difference between privacy and secrecy.

Harry & Meghan have invaded their own and others' privacy willy nilly. Almost all other members of the RF have respected their own and others' privacy - what do we really know about any of them, after all? They mostly don't say anything (Fergie and Andrew aside, and even then they've only ever spilled about themselves). Harry, especially, has been very open about some very intimate aspects of his inner life.

What Meghan & Harry go on about is "secrecy", which is different. It's selective. Privacy is generalised: my private life, my family life, my home life, my thoughts and opinions, even (for the RF) my personality. Secrecy is about specific things/events. Generally, the secrets H&M have made public have (1) been a retort about alleged accusations or perceived slights, like children having to have the last word (2) almost always reflect poorly on them (3) really should have been kept private for their children's sake because the internet is forever (4) are motivated by a desire to both make money out of publicizing them AND to raise their profiles.

The bullying investigation and report must be kept private. It's about many people's professional lives, and probably their emotional state at a given point. The victims are entitled to keep their secrets about how they were impacted (if they were), and the perpetrators don't need to be paraded through the village square by way of punishment. Banishment from the employer is the enough, and that's what's happened.

Serenster · 05/04/2024 13:54

This reply has been deleted

Withdrawn at poster's request

And this is the same women who requires not just her staff, but also members of the public with whom she interacts to sign NDAs agreeing that they won’t say anything negative about her (or anything at all without it being approved)…

jeffgoldblum · 05/04/2024 14:18

I find that extremely shocking @Serenster

jeffgoldblum · 05/04/2024 14:21

A fairly accurate description @Chupacabara .

Ratsoffasinkingsauage · 05/04/2024 14:28

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Chupacabara · 05/04/2024 14:43

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

Geebray · 05/04/2024 14:54

MaisieMacabe · 05/04/2024 08:58

He's had years to do that. He's had the money and rhe opportunity to sort it out, and move forward. It's a choice.

Indeed. Prince Harry is the Prince Andrew de nos jours.

Two men who can't understand that it's not them that makes them speshul, it's their family. Two men who were indulged by the late Queen, until even she had enough and stripped them of everything except their titles.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 05/04/2024 14:55

LipstickLil · 05/04/2024 11:54

@BigWillyLittleTodger the palace is an employer. It would've been seriously remiss of them, to say nothing of very bad for their image as employers, to not have a proper investigation into serious bullying allegations.

You accused the palace up-thread of allowing Meghan to get away with bullying members of staff (09:54 Meghan was a bully but the palace looked the other way), which is incorrect, as you yourself point out, because they held an investigation into the claims of bullying. Clearly the results showed that Meghan had bullied staff, because if she'd been exonerated don't you think that she and Harry would've been singing that from the rooftops and using the bullying claims as evidence that they themselves had been bullied?

because if she'd been exonerated don't you think that she and Harry would've been singing that from the rooftops and using the bullying claims as evidence that they themselves had been bullied?

Yes I’ve said as much in my posts.

Runnerinthenight · 05/04/2024 14:56

JJathome · 05/04/2024 09:03

I think a lot of it was sheer stupidity with Harry . Not understanding the impacts of his actions, doing as he pleases, saying what comes into his mind, with no filter, a feeling of entitlement, thinking he was funny sometimes, resenting any over sight.

with Megan from what we know it was much more sinister, she was rude, superior, belittling, demanding, insulting them . The way she spoke to the staff. The reports were damning. That she was screaming at staff, calling them repeatedly at home, insulting them, that she bullied two PAs to quit, that she felt it was insulting to have to deal with anyone junior, a very different animal to Harry.

the report was paid for privately by a member of the royal family , I assume Charles or the queen, conducted by a law firm, and then held confidentially, it looked into how they handled this, tightened procedures and made it a workplace people could speak up. The allegations themselves were accepted as so many witnessed it, she was spoken to about it multiple times by the royal family.

and that for me says a lot. I don’t bully people; I don’t shout and scream at them, I don’t harasses them by phoning every ten mins at home at night when I’m pissed off, I don’t know anyone who does. And if I did I’d not associate with them.

and when we look at how badly this has went wrong from pretty much rhe start I think understanding rhe true reality of the characters of both of them is really a key part.

What I can't get my head around is the level of arrogance and entitlement from someone literally in the RF for 5 minutes?! When you start any new job, you'd keep your head down for a bit, see the lie of the land, and try to prove yourself, not throw your weight around from Day 1? I just don't know who she thinks she is!

StormzyinaTCup · 05/04/2024 15:02

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Geebray · 05/04/2024 15:03

I think a lot of it was sheer stupidity with Harry . Not understanding the impacts of his actions, doing as he pleases, saying what comes into his mind, with no filter, a feeling of entitlement, thinking he was funny sometimes, resenting any over sight.

Yup @JJathome, he's literally Prince Andrew. The spare who thinks he's special, and has never been told otherwise.

Crazycrazylady · 05/04/2024 15:21

I think it's clear that Meghan is an incredibly confident woman who came in thinking she would show the royal family how it was all done . She definitely struggled with the protocol element ( ie not keeping gifts) walking a step behind Harry etc and two steps behind William and Kate
She came from a world where even as a not super actress, ringing and shouting at interns was very much the norm especially under the guise of being a perfectionist and expecting perfection from everyone around her when ever she wanted.
Ultimately she was just simply very very unsuited for a role in the royal family where you stay out of politics and anything controversial and do a lot of smiling and ribbon cutting .

Harry then simply adores her so much and can't believe his luck that she marriee him so much so that she can a) convince him of anything and b) wants her to have what ever she wants always - hence the tiara conversation.

They might do ok in the US when the dust settles a bit more .

Runnerinthenight · 05/04/2024 15:22

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Chupacabara · 05/04/2024 15:28

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

Chupacabara · 05/04/2024 15:33

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

IcedPurple · 05/04/2024 15:40

She came from a world where even as a not super actress, ringing and shouting at interns was very much the norm especially under the guise of being a perfectionist

I disagree.

The peak of Meghan's acting career was in an ensemble cast in a cable TV series filmed in Toronto for budget reasons. We're not talking Charlize Theron or Margot Robbie here. And even if we were, screaming at the 'underlings' would not be considered acceptable these days. For a minor actress like Meghan, it could well have led to her being written out of the series. She was just one person among many in what was likely a fairly mundane working environment. The 'interns' worked for the production studio. Not for her.

They might do ok in the US when the dust settles a bit more .

Doing what though? Their only real selling point is the royal connection, but that has become considerably devalued. They are also middle aged, lazy, difficult to work for and with no obvious talents. What do they have to offer to public life?

Chupacabara · 05/04/2024 15:52

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

BigWillyLittleTodger · 05/04/2024 16:16

Meghan’s friend Ellen DeGeneras was accused of bullying in the workplace, birds of a feather as they say.

Hughs · 05/04/2024 16:25

Who keeps reporting posts? Is that you Bouzy?

Theraininspainfalls · 05/04/2024 16:30

EdithWeston · 05/04/2024 09:15

I think Charles did his best, but he was an older dad

Not really - he was 33 when William was born and 35 for Harry. We think of him as "older" because Diana was much younger than him (19 on engagement, 20 on marriage and 21/23 when she had the DC).

He didn’t behave or look like a 35 year old. He was old before his time.

IcedPurple · 05/04/2024 16:33

This reply has been deleted

Withdrawn at poster's request

Yes.

Bullying in the workplace is no longer acceptable, even if you're an A lister. Of course it still does happen, but it's not the norm. And anyway, Meghan would not have had 'staff.' She was just another employee.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread