Harrys name appears in P Diddy court docs? Why?

[GoldThumb]

I’m seeing this on TwitX this morning.

Prince Harry’s name appears in PDiddys court docs, in relation to his ‘sex trafficking parties’.

From how I’m reading it, it doesn’t appear to actually say Harry attended, but why would his actual name appear? He seems to be the only example mentioned by name?

I’m assuming this court doc is real, I’m very confused by this?

I've seen pictures of the raids. The FBI tore those houses apart.

The Australian mushroom poisoning case - they had dogs trained to find tech like laptops, phones and sim cards. Amazing stuff.

My BiL (ex military) has worked with dogs trained to scent landmines and other explosives in some very hostile terrains.

Apparently Star Island has 1 causeway into the island - my error:

https://www.miamiluxuryhomes.com/miami-beach/star-island/

In NYC sniffer dogs will be at major transit hubs during high security alerts. They all come across as very serious and focused.

About this whole Diddy situation, Harry being mentioned in the lawsuit probably means nothing but it's interesting seeing the same people (if it doesn't apply to you, let it fly) who were talking about domestic violence, murder, self-harm, coma, infidelity, illegitimate children, divorce without any proof are now talking about the importance of context and facts.

why mention that though, these mysterious posters you won't name. I don't see any of the posters commenting about context and facts making the kind of comments you claim.

Absolutely.

Harry named in trafficking lawsuit = doesn't mean anything

Compared with a couple of random egs I saw on previous threads:

Kate and mother not smiling in car = divorce is on the way

William misses church service = he's talking her down from exposing his affair

Absolutely @Nono22972 . I just saw a post complaining about rumours and mud sticking - extraordinary.

Regarding PDiddy et al, I don’t understand why their misogyny and associated behaviour is never questioned. The lyrics! And videos featuring blokes in giant puffa jackets, big trousers, boots - being writhed over by girls wearing almost zilch. Don’t get it.

Regarding PDiddy et al, I don’t understand why their misogyny and associated behaviour is never questioned. The lyrics! And videos featuring blokes in giant puffa jackets, big trousers, boots - being writhed over by girls wearing almost zilch. Don’t get it.

Ummm its always been questioned! Lots of people talk about this and always have.

Absolutely.

I'm not sure why Harry was named, and I hope for his family's sake he was never involved. I'm inclined to think his name was used for attention and headlines (though Lord knows this case doesn't really need it). There have been several rumours about Harry over the years, and several new ones since he's been on California - but that's the risk of a "celebrity lifestyle" I suppose. All very tawdry and unnecessary.

There are also lots of rumours about William too.. wouldn't it be great if it all stopped and nobody repeated baseless rumours? It's not going to happen though, is it.

William's never been named in court documents before though.

That does raise the bar quite significantly.

I do not have your encyclopaedic knowledge of the twitter activity of every royal reporter.

I know how to use google and Twitter search. Getting this information takes quite a lot of time and would hardly be classed as speedy.

Maybe it’s you that thinks people wouldn’t check?

Ooh one fawning tweet 🤣. At least him and Rebecca English are in good company.

I think theres a difference between 'named' and name-dropped' and you know that theres no suggestion in those documents that Harry was ever at any of the parties or friends with him. William also spent time with him and could have been name-dropped too.

I’ve seen it questioned but honestly, as stupid as it sounds, even I didn’t think it was real. I just thought it was for shock value.

I did feel a bit weird about Martha Stewart hanging out with Calvin Broaddus.

Im endeavoring to use real names because I think some of these people hide behind the persona, even from themselves. Like PDiddy is horrible but Sean would never be like that.

Has Omid ever criticized Harry or Meghan?

I don’t even know who Rebecca English is, honestly.

I set my search parameters, defined in my post them and collated the tweets. I would maintain that the percentage in the Catherine column is more 50- 60% as opposed to 40% calculated. I do not think this is copious and that was my point. I also listed the content of the tweets to show what the Catherine tweets were actually saying. Contrast this with the output of other royal reporters. Eden (pro Catherine) was posting prolifically about Catherine.

thanks for all the information you share, your posts are always spot on.

Regarding PDiddy et al, I don’t understand why their misogyny and associated behaviour is never questioned. The lyrics! And videos featuring blokes in giant puffa jackets, big trousers, boots - being writhed over by girls wearing almost zilch. Don’t get it.

It’s almost as if many people have criticised this and have questioned it - see for example Oprah.

Ummm its always been questioned! Lots of people talk about this and always have.

Right? Literally a Jay Z video set me on my lifelong anti patriarchy journey.

We've been saturated with William rumours. Do share the ones about Harry in Cali please.

People have questioned it but it's very difficult to fight rich and powerful men