Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Harrys name appears in P Diddy court docs? Why?

433 replies

GoldThumb · 26/03/2024 06:53

I’m seeing this on TwitX this morning.

Prince Harry’s name appears in PDiddys court docs, in relation to his ‘sex trafficking parties’.

From how I’m reading it, it doesn’t appear to actually say Harry attended, but why would his actual name appear? He seems to be the only example mentioned by name?

I’m assuming this court doc is real, I’m very confused by this?

Harrys name appears in P Diddy court docs? Why?
OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
Lampzade · 27/03/2024 10:55

skullbabe · 27/03/2024 08:37

Are they seeing Harry as some kind of lifeline?

No they are using Harry as an example of the type of person that would attend the parties. They did not say that Harry attended the parties.

This is what I don’t get. They didn’t say that Harry attended his parties so why all the fuss.?
The only photo they have with them together was taken some seventeen years ago when PDiddy attended an event in memory of Princess Diana. William was there too .

It is obvious that Harry’s name was mentioned for clout.
I am sure that there are many people of influence who may have had dealings with PDiddy.

Some think that by linking Harry’s name to sex and drug trafficking it will somehow make it stick. Ridiculous

Lampzade · 27/03/2024 11:02

Ohpleeeease · 27/03/2024 07:06

Now would be a good time for H and M to consider the company they keep and the hospitality they accept. As someone said upthread, freebies are never free.

The royal family have accepted freebies/cash/ hospitality from some nefarious individuals.
As you said. Freebies are never free

OliverTwisted · 27/03/2024 11:04

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

areyoutheregod · 27/03/2024 11:04

(although I note several were defending Misan Harriman from allegations of altering photos in the way that Kate admitted she had done, so on the same themes as his Kate and William coverage.

Once again people are making false claims about Misan Harriman. An edit, like changing a photo from colour to black and white, is not the same as manipulating a photo, moving pixels, copy and pasting and creating an image that never existed. He actually shared the unedited photo, KP didn’t because they can’t.

OliverTwisted · 27/03/2024 11:08

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

areyoutheregod · 27/03/2024 11:10

Lampzade · 27/03/2024 10:55

This is what I don’t get. They didn’t say that Harry attended his parties so why all the fuss.?
The only photo they have with them together was taken some seventeen years ago when PDiddy attended an event in memory of Princess Diana. William was there too .

It is obvious that Harry’s name was mentioned for clout.
I am sure that there are many people of influence who may have had dealings with PDiddy.

Some think that by linking Harry’s name to sex and drug trafficking it will somehow make it stick. Ridiculous

The fuss is a distraction. Neither Harry or William were friends or associates of P Diddy. They were photographed with him at a charity event.

the only royal family members to have close relationships with people not just accused but convicted of abuse, are Charles and Andrew.

musthorse · 27/03/2024 11:16

@areyoutheregod are you maybe on the wrong thread? This one is about Harry being mentioned in relation to P Diddy's sex parties.

BemusedAmerican · 27/03/2024 11:17

Omid Scobie accused two innocent Dutch translators with impeccable reputations of mistranslating his book ( we all know that incident). I will never forget the look on the face of one of those poor women when she opened the door to all reporters. Fortunately it was shown that they had been given a version with names in it so their careers weren't ruined.

I was upset for those two women. I don't recall Scobie apologizing to them.

areyoutheregod · 27/03/2024 11:18

musthorse · 27/03/2024 11:16

@areyoutheregod are you maybe on the wrong thread? This one is about Harry being mentioned in relation to P Diddy's sex parties.

I replied to someone else, maybe direct your comment to them?

jeffgoldblum · 27/03/2024 11:18

I'd forgotten that @BemusedAmerican , a very good point!!!

OliverTwisted · 27/03/2024 11:19

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

musthorse · 27/03/2024 11:23

@areyoutheregod oh I didn't see that one but the comment is still valid .

themessygarden · 27/03/2024 11:24

It feels just a bit too random that Harry's name was mentioned, only based on a very old photo.

There are online rumours, from long before the court documents came out, that Harry has been partying solo in California, so if those rumours are true, its not beyond the realms of doubt that he turned up at one of Diddy's infamous parties. Does not mean he is guilty of anything at all though, and there is no inference in the documents that Harry partook in any illegal activities .

Lampzade · 27/03/2024 11:29

I would say it feels a bit too convenient rather than random tbf

AutumnCrow · 27/03/2024 11:32

So what's the 'play' here?

Insinuation about Harry, wait for statement of denial, produce more recent photo?

AliceOlive · 27/03/2024 11:36

skullbabe · 27/03/2024 08:04

Digging around a bit. Harry has just been on a ski holiday with Kris Jenner's boyfriend, Cory Gamble. Cory Gamble grew up with P Diddy and is the honorary uncle to PD's children. The Kardashians (whom the Sussexes appear to be getting close to) have been closely associated with PD for years.

Guilt by association is always unedifying. It’s not fair or right when it comes to people like Saville or Epstein - in the absence of actual evidence linking, in these examples, Charles or Elizabeth to the crimes committed by these people nor should it be used in a similar fashion when it comes to Harry.

I agree but unfortunately you and I are going to be in the minority on that. Many have called KC complicit in the behavior of his acquaintances. It’s just happened on this thread. We will see who holds Harry to the same standard and who does not.

I prefer to wait and see if there is any solid evidence of knowledge or participation, though.

AliceOlive · 27/03/2024 11:37

Lampzade · 27/03/2024 11:29

I would say it feels a bit too convenient rather than random tbf

Edited

Convenient for whom?

musthorse · 27/03/2024 11:41

themessygarden · 27/03/2024 11:24

It feels just a bit too random that Harry's name was mentioned, only based on a very old photo.

There are online rumours, from long before the court documents came out, that Harry has been partying solo in California, so if those rumours are true, its not beyond the realms of doubt that he turned up at one of Diddy's infamous parties. Does not mean he is guilty of anything at all though, and there is no inference in the documents that Harry partook in any illegal activities .

Yes I agree. It is a shame when someone is seen as suspicious because of knowing or being in the same company of them. I've seen that happen many many times on here before. Harry probably is an easy target in this case. We of course have no idea of what evidence there may be.

jeffgoldblum · 27/03/2024 11:50

Wow @BemusedAmerican !

BemusedAmerican · 27/03/2024 11:53

Yes, they even brought in dogs. Apparently the Florida island is so exclusive it can only be accessed by plane. I'm sure the neighbors got hysterical when the raids started.

jeffgoldblum · 27/03/2024 11:55

So just my own interest here , but this is another island associated with sex trafficking, separate but similar to Epsteins ? @BemusedAmerican .

AliceOlive · 27/03/2024 11:55

The concerning thing is that Jones is talking about 2023. Anyone around Combs is going to have seen what was going on.

Read the articles about Bieber as a child, Usher. It’s all obvious. The woman who sued him for raping her and filming it in 1991 when she was a young student with a brilliant figure ahead. Allegations by Cassie.

And how very stupid. Did we think it was really just lyrics?

jeffgoldblum · 27/03/2024 11:57

Lyrics @AliceOlive ?
Sorry to be dim , I've never listened to his or similar music ( I know, I know I have a very eclectic taste!)

Serenster · 27/03/2024 11:58

Yes, they even brought in dogs.

Dogs are really useful on searches - they can be trained to sniff out cash, firearms, drugs, you name it. So they are commonly deployed on UK searches, and I would assume it’s the same in the US.

Swipe left for the next trending thread