Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Photoshoot for the Sussex Children?

1000 replies

MrsFinkelstein · 21/03/2024 16:03

I actually hope this isn't true. It's one thing I've always admired of the Sussexes, that they have (generally) protected their children's privacy very effectively.

I hope its not related to the new commercial venture.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13220519/EDEN-CONFIDENTIAL-Meghan-Markle-photoshoot-Archie-Lilibet.html

EDEN CONFIDENTIAL: Meghan Markle has photoshoot of Archie and Lilibet

EDEN CONFIDENTIAL: The photo-shoot, at Prince Harry and Meghan's mansion in Montecito, coincided with the launch of Meghan's lifestyle and cookery brand, American Riviera Orchard.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13220519/EDEN-CONFIDENTIAL-Meghan-Markle-photoshoot-Archie-Lilibet.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
34
CathyorClaire · 21/03/2024 20:47

Surely they have nothing left to tell OW. They've been out of the RF for four years.

Harold said a while back he has enough for a second book. A second book that's now apparently been ditched in the vanishingly small hope of keeping Pa sweet. Four book deal publishers appear to be reserving comment.

Wouldn't put it past Oprah to laugh to the bank all over again given half a sniff.

CathyorClaire · 21/03/2024 21:00

I hope its not related to the new commercial venture.

I'm just waiting for soft focus, beige tinted long range shots of kids and wooden spoons stirring away in that dog's dinner of a kitchen 😎

Mylovelygreendress · 21/03/2024 21:03

TheCraicDealer · 21/03/2024 20:38

It would be a shame if they did this. Not only would it be sad that they’ve reduced the chances of their kids having a “normal life” (now or in the future), surely this is a bizarre move for two people so obsessed with security? If I genuinely thought there were credible threats against my kids from racists, Islamic terrorists or violently pro-BF persons, the last thing I would be doing would be to plaster them all over the internet or newspapers. And are people really going to be interested in discrete, cute shots of arms stirring cake batter or similar? I don’t think so, certainly not enough that it’ll help get this American Riveria Orchard off the ground.

If they wanted their DC to have normal lives they wouldn’t have lumbered them with Prince and Princess titles ! They will stick out like sore thumbs !

MrsFinkelstein · 21/03/2024 21:07

3kittens · 21/03/2024 19:52

How does this Sussex squad thing operate? Are they fans or do they work for H&M via some PR agency? How many are on the squad? It's hard to believe something like that exists? Who'd have the interest and time in taking part in stuff like that? Sounds pointless and toxic.

It's just a nickname H&M fans gave themselves online, and a hashtag they use.

It's just like "Team X" and "Team Y" - just a fan thing.

They are very well-organised, and IMO, very toxic and nasty to anyone they don't like. They've been a main driver in all of the negative rumours about the BRF.

OP posts:
smilesy · 21/03/2024 21:15

MrsFinkelstein · 21/03/2024 21:07

It's just a nickname H&M fans gave themselves online, and a hashtag they use.

It's just like "Team X" and "Team Y" - just a fan thing.

They are very well-organised, and IMO, very toxic and nasty to anyone they don't like. They've been a main driver in all of the negative rumours about the BRF.

I suspect there’s a few of them on here 🤪

threatmatrix · 21/03/2024 21:18

Salemforcuddles · 21/03/2024 16:12

You would think Oprah would keep her distance now

Always remember that the saint Keanu Reeves refused to accept something ( I can’t remember what) from Oprah stating she wasn’t a good person.

Salemforcuddles · 21/03/2024 21:22

Really? I haven't heard about that

AliceOlive · 21/03/2024 21:54

threatmatrix · 21/03/2024 21:18

Always remember that the saint Keanu Reeves refused to accept something ( I can’t remember what) from Oprah stating she wasn’t a good person.

That’s fake news. Never happened.

smilesy · 21/03/2024 21:55

Salemforcuddles · 21/03/2024 21:22

Really? I haven't heard about that

Ooh. I googled it. It didn’t happen . More fake news 😆

edit to add x post @AliceOlive

Salemforcuddles · 21/03/2024 22:13

I googled as well 🤣

MrsFinkelstein · 21/03/2024 23:06
Canadian Thank You GIF by NETFLIX

I did have to laugh at Saint Keanu.

Because he is.

OP posts:
BemusedAmerican · 21/03/2024 23:38

Perhaps they feel obligated to prove the kids actually exist as there are conspiracy theories about their existence.

Pompousdepompodour · 22/03/2024 00:24

Credulousloon · 21/03/2024 19:14

People said the same thing about the Oprah interview- it would never happen! But it did.

As conspiracy theories seem de rigueur on this forum now, here’s one of my own.

Harry and Meghan seem determined to raise their profile at any cost. I suspect they saw their big chance with Charles sick and Kate out of action. I absolutely believe reports that Harry offered to “help out” when he made his transatlantic mercy dash 12 minute visit to Charles, and I believe reports that Harry and Meghan offered to appear at the BAFTAs to “ease the pressure” on Will. They were likely quite enraged when this generous, thoughtful offer was rebuffed.

The Canada trip was like an ersatz Royal tour
with the focus mainly on them, not the athletes, and Harry spoke to US TV and made a determined attempt to showcase his statesmanlike credentials by weighing into discussions with First Nations (almost causing a diplomatic incident in the process). Undaunted, they proceeded to launch a brand new ‘SussexRoyal’ Website, complete with faux-royal styling and arms.

The Diana event last week was overshadowed by Harry’s late appearance on Zoom (after midnight) and the bizarre simultaneous launch of Meghan’s American Riviera Orchard Insta page.

But back to the situation with Kate…

Curiously, an AP journalist posted a tweet about the ‘killing’ of Kate’s DIY photoshopped Mother’s Day pic being a win for Meghan, shortly after AP issued that first ‘kill’ notice. Then a source “close to the Sussexes” reminded Page 6 that Meghan would “never make that sort of mistake” due to her faultless ‘attention to detail’. When this misjudged PR failed to have the desired effect, they distanced themselves from the source.

Since Kate was hospitalised in January, Sussex Squad have been busy trying to stir up drama about her online, running through a ‘greatest hits’ playlist of wild allegations - which they’ve been busily stirring up in the Celebitchy cauldron and elsewhere for years. Kate is lazy, Kate is bulimic, Kate is having a mental breakdown, Will is cheating with Rose, there is domestic abuse, Will isn’t visiting Kate in the hospital, they are getting divorced, George can’t get into Eton etc etc and they have upped the ante as time goes on. (The overlap on MN will be apparent to regular readers of these threads).

A quick glance at the timelines of prominent Sussex Squad accounts on Twitter over the past few months lays bare the complete strategy.

Then, in recent days, a series of characters from WME (the same agency that represents Harry and Meghan) has weighed helpfully into the bullying of Kate: Steven Colbert, Kim Kardashian, Blake Lively…seriously - so many coincidences…

I believe Kate will likely return at Easter and at that point, any opportunities for Meghan to capitalise on the associated global attention will dwindle. Conclusion: I suspect that photoshoot with the kids is indeed intended for public consumption.

I know Harry and Meghan have spoken out about the dangers of social media - but have they ever actually addressed the elephant in the room?

The Sussex Squad seem to be some of the most toxic people online - they have played a huge role in bullying Kate

Jereviensanouveau · 22/03/2024 02:27

@Pompousdepompodour

excellent question

AliceOlive · 22/03/2024 02:41

Credulousloon · 21/03/2024 19:14

People said the same thing about the Oprah interview- it would never happen! But it did.

As conspiracy theories seem de rigueur on this forum now, here’s one of my own.

Harry and Meghan seem determined to raise their profile at any cost. I suspect they saw their big chance with Charles sick and Kate out of action. I absolutely believe reports that Harry offered to “help out” when he made his transatlantic mercy dash 12 minute visit to Charles, and I believe reports that Harry and Meghan offered to appear at the BAFTAs to “ease the pressure” on Will. They were likely quite enraged when this generous, thoughtful offer was rebuffed.

The Canada trip was like an ersatz Royal tour
with the focus mainly on them, not the athletes, and Harry spoke to US TV and made a determined attempt to showcase his statesmanlike credentials by weighing into discussions with First Nations (almost causing a diplomatic incident in the process). Undaunted, they proceeded to launch a brand new ‘SussexRoyal’ Website, complete with faux-royal styling and arms.

The Diana event last week was overshadowed by Harry’s late appearance on Zoom (after midnight) and the bizarre simultaneous launch of Meghan’s American Riviera Orchard Insta page.

But back to the situation with Kate…

Curiously, an AP journalist posted a tweet about the ‘killing’ of Kate’s DIY photoshopped Mother’s Day pic being a win for Meghan, shortly after AP issued that first ‘kill’ notice. Then a source “close to the Sussexes” reminded Page 6 that Meghan would “never make that sort of mistake” due to her faultless ‘attention to detail’. When this misjudged PR failed to have the desired effect, they distanced themselves from the source.

Since Kate was hospitalised in January, Sussex Squad have been busy trying to stir up drama about her online, running through a ‘greatest hits’ playlist of wild allegations - which they’ve been busily stirring up in the Celebitchy cauldron and elsewhere for years. Kate is lazy, Kate is bulimic, Kate is having a mental breakdown, Will is cheating with Rose, there is domestic abuse, Will isn’t visiting Kate in the hospital, they are getting divorced, George can’t get into Eton etc etc and they have upped the ante as time goes on. (The overlap on MN will be apparent to regular readers of these threads).

A quick glance at the timelines of prominent Sussex Squad accounts on Twitter over the past few months lays bare the complete strategy.

Then, in recent days, a series of characters from WME (the same agency that represents Harry and Meghan) has weighed helpfully into the bullying of Kate: Steven Colbert, Kim Kardashian, Blake Lively…seriously - so many coincidences…

I believe Kate will likely return at Easter and at that point, any opportunities for Meghan to capitalise on the associated global attention will dwindle. Conclusion: I suspect that photoshoot with the kids is indeed intended for public consumption.

👆👆👆

AliceOlive · 22/03/2024 02:43

Salemforcuddles · 21/03/2024 22:13

I googled as well 🤣

Really random!

mathanxiety · 22/03/2024 05:02

Mylovelygreendress · 21/03/2024 21:03

If they wanted their DC to have normal lives they wouldn’t have lumbered them with Prince and Princess titles ! They will stick out like sore thumbs !

How would they stick out?

They will have the normal lives of rich Californian kids.

OneHeartySnail · 22/03/2024 05:25

@Mylovelygreendress I agree, calling them prince/princess isn't exactly a sign of wanting anonymity for them.

Outthedoor24 · 22/03/2024 06:02

@Credulousloon
I think you are right.
I'll go further with my thoughts.

Where is H&Ms money coming from now?
They aren't making the big bucks from Spotify & Netflix the way they hoped they would.
They can't have many more stories to tell and Charles & William have made sure there aren't any recent photos of the Sussexs near the Senior Royals.

Is Charles bailing them out?

Was that 12 min meeting party a "oh shit, if Pa'pa pops it, what will become of us, our income"

FloofCloud · 22/03/2024 06:06

Seizethedog · 21/03/2024 16:31

I’ve always thought they were keeping the children back until they could market them for maximum gain. All they care about is money.

I suspect they're using them as props to garner more interest because their popularity is so low, well MM's is anyway.

Freakinfraser · 22/03/2024 06:13

Is there not a trade mark thing for something called Lillie’s kitchen they have done, and something to do with kids clothes? So possibly they are using their kids in these ventures,

surprised anyone saying “i don’t think they’d do that”, they already have, so it’s more “I don’t think they’d do it a second time”

I think it’s highly feasible they are about to use their kids for commercial gain/ventures

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 22/03/2024 06:33

Lillie’s kitchen? Not Archie’s? How sexist! Will we have 11 year old Lillie writing to the President about her own parents’ sexism?

smilesy · 22/03/2024 07:03

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 22/03/2024 06:33

Lillie’s kitchen? Not Archie’s? How sexist! Will we have 11 year old Lillie writing to the President about her own parents’ sexism?

Lili’s kitchen will no doubt feature a recipe for Marmalade Sandwiches as they were the late Queen’s favourite and Lili is named after her 🤪

Mercurial123 · 22/03/2024 07:07

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 22/03/2024 06:33

Lillie’s kitchen? Not Archie’s? How sexist! Will we have 11 year old Lillie writing to the President about her own parents’ sexism?

Lily's kitchen is a pet food brand, so that might cause some confusion.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.