Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, spotted out and about, part 4

1000 replies

pipsfromthefuture · 06/03/2024 12:52

Part 4 of a nice, unproblematic thread to discuss some of the fab outfits from the Duchess of Sussex, and some of the many great causes she (and Harry) and Archewell supports.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
122
Pushtart · 06/03/2024 15:35

isn't this a thread about Meghan?

AlbertoDilemma · 06/03/2024 15:41

Gorgeous pictures so far. The Meghan/blue dress picture of the Sussexes really is something else.

I know face coverings are controversial, but I love how they draw you to a person's eyes. Kate's are beguiling in that photo.

SheriffofRottingham · 06/03/2024 15:49

So glad the royal photographer Samir is getting love ❤️ I’m a fan, and so glad to find out about the exhibition 🤩

ArcaneWireless · 06/03/2024 15:51

Perhaps not an iconic photo but this is one of my favourites.

The dogs 🥰

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, spotted out and about, part 4
ArcaneWireless · 06/03/2024 15:58

He definitely gets the diamonds falling from the sky brief.

Samir is gifted.

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, spotted out and about, part 4
SheriffofRottingham · 06/03/2024 16:00

He’s certainly got the eye! Looking at the exhibition details, looks like there will be some fab ones of Diana and Kate

ArcaneWireless · 06/03/2024 16:01

The way he captures water is beautiful. Reminiscent of one (one of many) of my favourite artists. Naomi Tydeman.

Someone who can convey the sparkle that you think no one can ever capture The way you do with your own eyes.

Perfection.

AlbertoDilemma · 06/03/2024 16:05

ArcaneWireless · 06/03/2024 15:58

He definitely gets the diamonds falling from the sky brief.

Samir is gifted.

Wow, I thought the H&M iconic photo was a one off and some sort of photographic fluke, but Samir appears to be the rainy day picture expert! Catherine looks incredible in that photo and William so funny, what a great shot. I'm definitely going to go to this exhibition, it looks superb from the gallery page. What an incredible photographer he is.

SheriffofRottingham · 06/03/2024 16:07

ArcaneWireless · 06/03/2024 16:01

The way he captures water is beautiful. Reminiscent of one (one of many) of my favourite artists. Naomi Tydeman.

Someone who can convey the sparkle that you think no one can ever capture The way you do with your own eyes.

Perfection.

You’ve conveyed that beautifully.

I’ll look up some of that artists work, thank you 🙏

BoohooWoohoo · 06/03/2024 16:10

Samir has an Instagram account with his amazing photos. I can recommend following. @SamHussein1

SheriffofRottingham · 06/03/2024 16:19

Thanks for the links both 👏

SheriffofRottingham · 06/03/2024 16:22

He captures Charles so well, and a nice but sad one of Harry and William on there too

ArcaneWireless · 06/03/2024 16:41

Thank you both for the links.

Some wonderful photos there.

I’m sure I spotted Pippa on Samir’s site but a quick Google says that two other photographers were used for her wedding.

Maybe I’ve got it wrong. Or did he just have a cheeky turn up and click?

If so, he managed to capture it beautifully.

It doesn’t matter who he snaps. He just seems to capture the moment.

An art that is.

thisiswheretheseagullfliesaway · 06/03/2024 17:19

There is something so real about his photos, I love photos like this that aren't posed.

The blue of Meghan's dress was the same colour as my bridesmaid dresses. It was very vivid and really stood out in the photos.

pipsfromthefuture · 06/03/2024 18:15

Have an idea for a new thread, BRB!

OP posts:
SqueakyDinosaur · 07/03/2024 09:27

On the M&H photo, which was, IIRC, just before they left the UK, Tina Brown in the Palace Papers, quotes Keats, which seems perfect to me:

"And they are gone: ay, ages long ago
These lovers fled away into the storm."

TallerSally · 07/03/2024 16:39

Another week another couple of announcements re work Meghan and Harry are doing. Let's see if posters can park their usual sentiments about the people involved to instead engage on the content and cause being discussed, as it should be quite relevant for a site called "Mumsnet"... (here's hope for you!)

So, one day before Meghan appears on a keynote panel at SXSW, her and Geena Davis (and Moms First, a longtime charity partner of the Archewell Foundation) have launched a report to raise awareness about the ways television depicts characters who are mothers.

"On Thursday, Moms First and the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media shared the results of a study that shows how those portrayals don’t always reflect reality, and argues that a change is necessary if we want to shift public attitudes and policy. The study, funded by the Archewell Foundation, found that though TV moms have become slightly more diverse, they are still underrepresented as earners and are still largely young, white, and thin. In 2022, when a couple with kids under 18 had a clear breadwinner, they were male 86.5% of the time. The study found that childcare and the realities of keeping a house running are largely erased.
In an interview with Vanity Fair, Davis says she was surprised by how “dated” the various portrayals of TV moms seemed. “The representation of motherhood seemed like such a throwback,” she says. “It didn’t reflect modern reality anywhere near as closely as I had hoped or imagined.”
In a statement, Meghan explained her reasoning for signing on to the project. “My past experience as an actress, and now today as a producer and mother, have amplified my belief in the critical importance of supporting women and moms both behind the lens and in front of it,” she said. “This report about the portrayal of mothers in entertainment highlights the gaps we need to fill to achieve true representation in the content we create and consume, and I’m honored to support this work through the Archewell Foundation.”
Davis has been working on issues of women’s representation since she founded the institute in 2004, based on the idea that presenting producers and film executives with the numbers about gender disparity in media could lead to tangible change. “Images have a profound impact on people’s perceptions of themselves and others, and therefore the images can be used to create good,” she says. “I saw that children’s movies and TV made specifically for kids seemed to have a huge gender disparity…. What if we’re training kids from the beginning to have unconscious gender bias by showing boys as more important and taking up more space in the world?”

more here, and link to report below:

https://www.vanityfair.com/style/meghan-duchess-of-sussex-geena-davis-moms-first-report

Rewriting Motherhood: How TV Represents Moms and What We Want To See Next - Geena Davis Institute

Download Full Report (PDF) Although many factors contribute to the persistent belief that moms who work should also be their families’ primary caregivers, in this report we are interested in the degree to which fictionalized portrayals of mothers in me...

https://seejane.org/research-informs-empowers/rewriting-motherhood-how-tv-represents-moms-and-what-we-want-to-see-next/

AliceOlive · 07/03/2024 16:48

Another week another couple of announcements re work Meghan and Harry are doing. Let's see if posters can park their usual sentiments about the people involved to instead engage on the content and cause being discussed, as it should be quite relevant for a site called "Mumsnet"... (here's hope for you!)

Kindly, I hope you will take your own advice.

It’s so very nice here when the positive threads stay positive and are void of sarcasm, goading and snarky emojis.

I think many posters try to stick to that but get sucked in when one person begins.

Mylovelygreendress · 07/03/2024 16:52

@AliceOlive 👏( although I would have omitted the word kindly )

SheriffofRottingham · 07/03/2024 17:21

TallerSally · 07/03/2024 16:39

Another week another couple of announcements re work Meghan and Harry are doing. Let's see if posters can park their usual sentiments about the people involved to instead engage on the content and cause being discussed, as it should be quite relevant for a site called "Mumsnet"... (here's hope for you!)

So, one day before Meghan appears on a keynote panel at SXSW, her and Geena Davis (and Moms First, a longtime charity partner of the Archewell Foundation) have launched a report to raise awareness about the ways television depicts characters who are mothers.

"On Thursday, Moms First and the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media shared the results of a study that shows how those portrayals don’t always reflect reality, and argues that a change is necessary if we want to shift public attitudes and policy. The study, funded by the Archewell Foundation, found that though TV moms have become slightly more diverse, they are still underrepresented as earners and are still largely young, white, and thin. In 2022, when a couple with kids under 18 had a clear breadwinner, they were male 86.5% of the time. The study found that childcare and the realities of keeping a house running are largely erased.
In an interview with Vanity Fair, Davis says she was surprised by how “dated” the various portrayals of TV moms seemed. “The representation of motherhood seemed like such a throwback,” she says. “It didn’t reflect modern reality anywhere near as closely as I had hoped or imagined.”
In a statement, Meghan explained her reasoning for signing on to the project. “My past experience as an actress, and now today as a producer and mother, have amplified my belief in the critical importance of supporting women and moms both behind the lens and in front of it,” she said. “This report about the portrayal of mothers in entertainment highlights the gaps we need to fill to achieve true representation in the content we create and consume, and I’m honored to support this work through the Archewell Foundation.”
Davis has been working on issues of women’s representation since she founded the institute in 2004, based on the idea that presenting producers and film executives with the numbers about gender disparity in media could lead to tangible change. “Images have a profound impact on people’s perceptions of themselves and others, and therefore the images can be used to create good,” she says. “I saw that children’s movies and TV made specifically for kids seemed to have a huge gender disparity…. What if we’re training kids from the beginning to have unconscious gender bias by showing boys as more important and taking up more space in the world?”

more here, and link to report below:

https://www.vanityfair.com/style/meghan-duchess-of-sussex-geena-davis-moms-first-report

So far this has been a nice and unproblematic thread, so why the goading with:

‘Let's see if posters can park their usual sentiments about the people involved to instead engage on the content and cause being discussed, as it should be quite relevant for a site called "Mumsnet"... (here's hope for you!)’

it’s almost as though you’re trying to deliberately elicit a certain type of response.

pipsfromthefuture · 07/03/2024 17:23

Enough already all of you.

AliceOlive has already addressed it. There's no need for a pile on.

If you cannot participate in this thread without goading or being snarky about Meghan or other poster, please leave and stop trying to ruin it.

This goes for every one.

OP posts:
GrouchyKiwi · 07/03/2024 17:27

There are some pretty lazy tropes about motherhood - and parents in general - that script writers seem to default to with wearying predictability. It's a good conversation to have.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.