Ah. An advocate of women’s rights.
You’d think that would include being supportive of a woman’s right to medical privacy or accepting the given statement instead of making up shite to fit a narrative.
As an aside, the only time I thought I was seriously ill - and chose to seek help, it was dismissed as hysteria and mental illness.
It wasn’t.
No one is saying the King had an issue with his mental health and they covered it up with prostate problems are they?
Isn't it funny how mental illness is often the go to when questioning the actions of women? Despite there being a statement given as to the reason for hospitalisation? Which in turn was probably only given to stop speculation like this or causing distress to her kids/family with puerile gossip.
I wonder if she’d have preferred to keep the whole matter private. As would have been her right. You know? A woman’s right.
Nothing will ever change with regards to mental illness with this type of attitude. Necessary to create subterfuge? Alluding it to be some kind of shameful secret that she would have to lie about? Or accusing someone of suffering when there is no proof - like a snidey little insult?
Why is her word not enough? It should be.
Women’s rights advocate? My arse.