Queen's fury over naming of baby Lilibet: Aide says monarch was 'as angry as I'd ever seen her' after Harry and Meghan claim

[royalwatcherr]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12962667/queen-elizabeth-II-fury-prince-harry-meghan-markle-baby-lilibet.html

I'm not surprised, choosing that name was so brazen

No. It was about their daughter as you well know as you quoted it

Yes, I agree with you. Flet like a ploy to show the world they were still on good terms amd close with the Queen.

You could see the child's genitals that's why! You can see Archie's face.

I'm hoping that as you think a child has been exploited sexually then you've contacted the police with your concerns.

We are on the brink of WWIII and you are getting uptight about a baby’s name…

It is not about ownership. They could name the baby whatever they want. But if you are close to someone you don’t use a name that would upset them.

I agree.

God yeah, poor child!

The poster I quoted said the queen owned the name outright.

We named our new puppy Lillibet on the 9th Sept 2022. Seemed innocuous enough.

Of course.

As much as I liked the Queen, she didn’t own the name Lilibet, no-one does. It’s a ridiculous story and one I don’t believe.

Are you referring to OP? Because she seems to agree with the DM.

Adorable @Eyesopenwideawake

@Roussette you are confusing a jokey comment about an imaginary future with the present day Lilibet which was in reply to Not rating poor Lili's chances twenty years on...

@Eyesopenwideawake she is beautiful

I'm going to suggest that it gave Harry many, many more opportunities in life than if he'd been born plain Harry Smith.

Don’t be ridiculous. The photos of the child years ago ( Julia Somerville’s daughter , I googled ) were private family photographs similar to ones I have of my 3 .
H and M profess to shield their DC ( which I thought was right) but then have them on their Netflix reality show . Sheer hypocrisy. It’s one thing having family photos quite another to share them with the world.

It’s just extremely distasteful and hurtful, and again the Royals sit back and say nothing about something potentially very damaging to a little girl as she’s growing up…their grandchild and niece, all while keeping Andrew in the fold. It tells you all you need to know about them and why H&M and their kids are best off out of it.

Years ago when the Sunday Times Rich List first came out, the Queen was deemed richest because of the Royal Collections and Crown Estate.
She made a point of asking if she might sell them all, knowing full well that they are held under the monarch's name for future generations.
My point was that despite the wealth and trappings of her position she had few, private things to call her own. One of those was the nickname given to her because of a childhood lisp, when she couldn't pronounce Elizabeth.
It's not a matter of ownership but disrespect by someone who considers herself to be the Grace Kelly of the Windsors, adding some class that they couldn't manage themselves.

Well that's definitely not me

I'm going to suggest that it gave Harry many, many more opportunities in life than if he'd been born plain Harry Smith.

It probably did Maireas

It certainly have him a lift up for his Legend of Aviation award…

If you know, you know😉

So why maintain the link with such a distasteful family ? Why call their precious daughter a controversial name ? Why insist on titles for them ?

And for all you know Harry asked his granny’s permission and she said yes. I wouldn’t believe the word of an aide trying to flog some books.

This is everywhere, it’s even being reported in the us, and the book author must be very very sure, as Harry and Megan are trigger happy level of litigious, they even threaten to sue when they know they are wrong.

either way, the thought they did something that upset the queen so much will be hugely damaging for them, and they aren’t in a good place.

in addition, I and many other people found it crass. And can well believe she didn’t like it.

but yes, this is just more damaging publicity for them, over something that many people find both crass and believable.