Very interesting that the Telegraph changed the slant of that article in a single line. It's Harry with the connections to the Telegraph.
As I posited upthread, it would not surprise me if he was blindsided by the discussion in Oprah and subsequent racism row, and was attempting to row it back in his Bradby interview - specifically trying to row it back for UK audiences.
If the article originally downplayed the matter, this again sounds to me like Harry trying to calm the waters pre Coronation; the changed line, ramping up the ill treatment angle, seems intended to keep M's original Oprah claims live (I wonder if Harry was told off post the original publication).
I wonder if the existence of the letters was leaked in April as the "cold open" to the Scobie book - ie to allow him to claim the matter is in the public domain anyway and deflect from his original sources (his information gathering would have predated that Telegraph article by a long time, given the original publication date for Endgame). He's using a similar argument about information already being in the public domain to deflect from the Dutch debacle - public domain here being "Fleet Street" knowing the names of the Royals Meghan had named in the letters. I'm now wondering if he's just talking about the Telegraph journalist.
I believe H&M were at the Katy Perry concert with an American billionaire who is interested in buying the Telegraph. It definitely feels like this is their mouthpiece of choice (well, the high brow one, anyway).