Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

The royals and Dan Wootton: Byline Times part 1 of 3-year investigation into how Wootton got information about the royal family

1000 replies

queentim · 30/10/2023 16:07

Following their series about the Crisis in British Journalism and MediaToo movement, Byline Times reporters have recently released the first report of the 3 year investigation into the link between the royals and (disgraced) TV presenter Dan Wootton.

The first report reveals how Charles and William were angered that Harry refused to remove the name of an aide (William's aide in Kensington) who was paid cash to leak stories about his wife Meghan, and son Archie. This included investigations by the Met.

As a result, Charles removed the $700,000 granted to support them, which would have seen Harry and Meghan living in Canada and representing the Queen, in an effort to bring them back to the UK by exposing their location in Canada and removing their security. This was the collapse of the 'Sandringham Agreement', which resulted in the signing of the Sussexes media deals.

Some highlights, but can be bought for £3.6:

▪ It followed news that a partner of a key aide to Prince William received £4,000 from The Sun allegedly for stories about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex when Wootton was executive editor.

▪ The Metropolitan Police looked into the alleged leaking but could not go to a judge for a warrant to search royal staff property without knowing the identity of the whistle-blowers.

▪ Two internal royal investigations followed – one involving Simon Case, who is today the embattled head of the civil service facing questions over the Government’s response to the pandemic.

▪ Byline Times has uncovered new photographic evidence of Wootton, the aide and the aide’s partner at a lavish private birthday party Wootton threw for his close friends in a £1,675-a-night hotel suite.

▪ Prince Harry sent formal ‘letters before action’ detailing the claims about Wootton and the palace to News UK.

▪ When the aide’s name was not removed from the legal letters, the Sussexes were cut adrift financially and left unable to protect themselves despite having a security threat level equal to the monarch.

▪ The royal household had thought the threat of exposure would force Harry and Meghan to return to the UK, where their profile could be controlled preventing them from eclipsing the future King

Exploding ‘Megxit’: How Dan Wootton and a Cash-for-Leaks Scandal Split the Monarchy

Exploding 'Megxit': How Dan Wootton and a Cash-for-Leaks Scandal Split the Monarchy – Byline Times

The first retail edition of Byline Times' monthly newspaper reveals the world exclusive story about why Prince Harry and Meghan really left the Royal Family

https://bylinetimes.com/2023/10/25/exploding-megxit-how-dan-wootton-and-a-cash-for-leaks-scandal-split-the-monarchy/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
40
LadyChatterjee · 05/04/2024 09:39

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

StormzyinaTCup · 05/04/2024 09:56

It’s clearly a pre-requisite that, in order to be part of this cult mentality group, you have to be a complete hypocrite . This is clearly demonstrated by the couple at the very top all the way down to the minions at the bottom.

How perfectly ordinary people can get sucked into this to the point where they may even face criminal charges, blows my mind tbh 🤯

CathyorClaire · 05/04/2024 10:59

Ratsoffasinkingsauage · 04/04/2024 21:35

This doesn’t look good. If true it means this member of the Sussex Squad had a donation made to their university department by Archwell. Extremely shady.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13268699/UCLA-race-equity-director-kate-cancer-fake-meghan.html

😮

Amazing he hasn't lost his job already. Will be interesting to see if he gets kicked out this time round.

How many more of these toxic associations are going to come tumbling out of the Sussex cupboard? I'm getting the feeling we're nowhere near done.

jeffgoldblum · 05/04/2024 11:18

😮

LadyChatterjee · 05/04/2024 11:39

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

TheIcecreamManCometh · 05/04/2024 12:09

Haven't rtft but imho

Dan Wooton - sleb twaddle muck-raking "journo"
Christian Jones - former KP press secretary
Callum Stephens - freelance PR, Christian's partner

and the "cash-for-leaks" premise is Occam's razor
All three knew each other
Very easy to leak info either deliberately (tarnish your competition) or via pillow talk
"Sources" are usually protected
Wills gets positivity, Megs gets thrown under the bus, leaker makes a fast $, boom
Clearly, naming the Press Secretary/his DP makes the future Crown look bad and even complicit, so Daddy and Bullybro try and shut that down.

Hardly Columbo, is it?

I still think H+M could have been an asset, could have done well in Canada (or Australia or Africa) doing charity and commonwealth work without having to go LC/NC: even if it was just for a couple of years but the Heir didn't want the Spare to get special treatment/be let off the hook for a while/become popular elsewhere so spit their dummy out and put the kibosh on it using means at his disposal.
Sibling rivalry Envy Tale as old as time.

Edit: Aargh! Didn't realise the OP was so long ago. As you were...

LadyChatterjee · 05/04/2024 12:24

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

MrsFinkelstein · 05/04/2024 12:30

@TheIcecreamManCometh I'd maybe read the last 3-4 pages.

It's a whole new ballgame now.
Byline Times totally discredited

TheIcecreamManCometh · 05/04/2024 12:36

Do you have a source for that Finkel? Flowers
Discredited by whom?
Because it's all too much of a coincidink when the palace started their clean out and the PRs were resigning.
If it's been proven legally, I'll retract the post above.
Looks at watch: have I got time to read 34 pages?!

ArcaneWireless · 05/04/2024 12:40

the Heir didn't want the Spare to get special treatment/be let off the hook for a while/become popular elsewhere so spit their dummy out and put the kibosh on it using means at his disposal.

I’d love to see the source for this.

LadyChatterjee · 05/04/2024 12:44

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

BemusedAmerican · 05/04/2024 12:44

Sorry, 2021 statement. Caffeine didn't kick in yet.

LadyChatterjee · 05/04/2024 12:48

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 05/04/2024 12:53

TheIcecreamManCometh · 05/04/2024 12:36

Do you have a source for that Finkel? Flowers
Discredited by whom?
Because it's all too much of a coincidink when the palace started their clean out and the PRs were resigning.
If it's been proven legally, I'll retract the post above.
Looks at watch: have I got time to read 34 pages?!

Edited

The Byline Times' claims were investigated by police who found no evidence against DW to bring a case. The Guardian and The Mirror have had to pay compensation and print apologies to him for repeating the allegations. DW is in the process of suing TBT, who are crowdfunding their legal fund. The Sussex Squad have been alleged to be a major financial contributor to TBT. Far from being independent journalists, it is alleged that TBT has been acting in conjunction with a major SS figure, Sarah Data, and Prince Harry, to pursue the now discredited criminal claims against DW.

TheIcecreamManCometh · 05/04/2024 12:56

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 03/04/2024 16:21

Ah I wondered what he was doing now.
He's decided to do what was once so successful for Russell Brand and spout his nonsense on the tube of you.
I guess there's cash to be had in it.
There'll certainly be an audience for it.

BemusedAmerican · 05/04/2024 12:56

Interesting info about UCLA guy. He was allowed to graduate.

https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/greedy-associates/virginia-3l-recants-racial-profiling-claim/

BemusedAmerican · 05/04/2024 12:59

About Findlaw.com
https://www.findlaw.com/company.html

Vespanest · 05/04/2024 13:00

I think it was the 2022 financials of senteble when the Sussex Squad were acknowledged for their financial contribution. It would be interesting to understand where this money is coming from. The Squad itself is not that huge of a group but can produce tens of thousands of pounds.

BemusedAmerican · 05/04/2024 13:02

Charity Watch in the US noted that Archewell received multiple small donations.
https://www.charitywatch.org/charity-donating-articles/archewell-foundation-charitywatch-rating

LadyChatterjee · 05/04/2024 13:02

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

LadyChatterjee · 05/04/2024 13:04

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 05/04/2024 13:08

BemusedAmerican · 05/04/2024 12:56

How has he gone from being a student under threat of non graduation for being a blatant liar and making serious and false race based allegations, to having a top diversity job in a major university - in the space of 5 years?

TheIcecreamManCometh · 05/04/2024 13:10

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 05/04/2024 12:53

The Byline Times' claims were investigated by police who found no evidence against DW to bring a case. The Guardian and The Mirror have had to pay compensation and print apologies to him for repeating the allegations. DW is in the process of suing TBT, who are crowdfunding their legal fund. The Sussex Squad have been alleged to be a major financial contributor to TBT. Far from being independent journalists, it is alleged that TBT has been acting in conjunction with a major SS figure, Sarah Data, and Prince Harry, to pursue the now discredited criminal claims against DW.

Thanks for the summary.
Exaro were taken down by believing Carl Beech.
Byline Times are being taken down by believing Alex Truby.
What has happened to him?
Has he been arrested for slander/libel/perverting the course of justice?
I assume as Wooton has no case to answer and has been successful in having papers remove stories, this means that the majority believe anything Byline produced in the past won't hold up to scrutiny.
Were they sued for the story in the original OP? Has that itself been discredited?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.