The royals and Dan Wootton: Byline Times part 1 of 3-year investigation into how Wootton got information about the royal family

[queentim]

Following their series about the Crisis in British Journalism and MediaToo movement, Byline Times reporters have recently released the first report of the 3 year investigation into the link between the royals and (disgraced) TV presenter Dan Wootton.

The first report reveals how Charles and William were angered that Harry refused to remove the name of an aide (William's aide in Kensington) who was paid cash to leak stories about his wife Meghan, and son Archie. This included investigations by the Met.

As a result, Charles removed the $700,000 granted to support them, which would have seen Harry and Meghan living in Canada and representing the Queen, in an effort to bring them back to the UK by exposing their location in Canada and removing their security. This was the collapse of the 'Sandringham Agreement', which resulted in the signing of the Sussexes media deals.

Some highlights, but can be bought for £3.6:

▪ It followed news that a partner of a key aide to Prince William received £4,000 from The Sun allegedly for stories about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex when Wootton was executive editor.

▪ The Metropolitan Police looked into the alleged leaking but could not go to a judge for a warrant to search royal staff property without knowing the identity of the whistle-blowers.

▪ Two internal royal investigations followed – one involving Simon Case, who is today the embattled head of the civil service facing questions over the Government’s response to the pandemic.

▪ Byline Times has uncovered new photographic evidence of Wootton, the aide and the aide’s partner at a lavish private birthday party Wootton threw for his close friends in a £1,675-a-night hotel suite.

▪ Prince Harry sent formal ‘letters before action’ detailing the claims about Wootton and the palace to News UK.

▪ When the aide’s name was not removed from the legal letters, the Sussexes were cut adrift financially and left unable to protect themselves despite having a security threat level equal to the monarch.

▪ The royal household had thought the threat of exposure would force Harry and Meghan to return to the UK, where their profile could be controlled preventing them from eclipsing the future King

Exploding ‘Megxit’: How Dan Wootton and a Cash-for-Leaks Scandal Split the Monarchy

There are so many posters that have mysteriously vanished. From the hardcore “I defend MM because she’s black” which was honest but I felt quite sorry for MM as it was such a reductive comment. Surely her superfans see more than that in her to defend. To the “I just don’t like bullying” (the IRONY of that now!” Usually followed by Andrew whataboutery whenever the Sussexes did something or made up something bizarre.

I will say that originally I was quite “ooh, glam royals” then the engagement interview made me feel nauseous, not bothering going to the Invictus event in Australia due to “tiredness” but mysteriously being able to make a swanky lunch. If you’re “tired” go and see the amputee war heroes, and skip the lunch. Or…. DO IT ANYWAY like the rest of BRF who were almost certainly “tired” in their 90s or with cancer. Running out of one market dramatically on tour (can anyone imagine Princess Anne or Sophie doing this?).

Then the jacking in of the marines memorial service for the Lion King was gross. Then claiming the amazing vanishing South African at the Lion King said her marriage had dancing in the streets akin to the moment of Mandela’s release (WHHYYYYYYY? Why say that? Where is this man?), touting for business there. Whinging no one asks if you’re ok on a tour of African countries is so tone deaf it’s jaw dropping. The mocking curtsy to the late Queen, the absurd comparison to the Little Mermaid “she lost her voice”, saying she couldn’t wear the same colours as any royals so was essentially forced to wear neutrals (does she think no one can check?!).

Lying to the court about colluding with Finding Freebies author, announcing with soulful sad eyes her passport was taken from her but not mentioning she managed to go to 11 (?) different countries while held as prisoner.

and yet with all of this, I still think Harry is the twat of the story. Privileged, spoilt, racist, unhelpful, dishonest about the job in question, absurd expectations and overegged the pudding entirely from day one. And if MY DH, had brought a photo of MIL into my labour and taken my gas and air, I’d have done more than make him move to California.

Is this the new script, ladies? We scared them all off the RF forum because they just couldn't take it any more? All of them, none of them, except Brave Temour.

Yes I see what you mean hugh, but I thought perhaps there was something new on top of this

Edited for typo

Well @Puzzledandpissedoff I guess the newer part is the stuff about the Sussex Squad, Christopher Bouzy and Johnathan Perks, their suspected organised trolling and bullying of W+K and how they are linked to H+M. Also in the press lately.

You're right, hugh, but the trouble is it's all the usual Twitter rubbish, largely taking part of what's a cesspit at the best of times - though I believe Bouzy runs his own website too

I agree, though, that H&M's possible links to/driving of all this is something that's worth watching, and like others suspect there's more to come out on this

I think most will be safe enough.

I hear that the squad can’t go up stairs.

But they Can

I’m more worried that Daleks are promoting the withdrawal method.

I suspect many of the squad are a result of that kind of caper.

.

🤣

There's a massive difference in going after individual posters (which nobody here is doing, I don't think) and making observations on an unusual phenomenon; namely, the sudden influx of new posters saying utterly vile things about Catherine as per the SS script, and their sudden departure upon the Sussex Squad scandal being talked about in MSM. But not just them, everyone else whose opinions might be sympathetic to H&M going too. The betrayal @Prydddan mentioned has nothing to do with good faith and even heated discussion with opposing voices with a regular presence, and everything to do with the uneasy feeling that some of these discussions were never in good faith with, for want of a better term, "normal" people, and that we were being played by an organised group.

@LadyChatterjee there are some very amusing memes around at the moment😂

Marathon.

Spangle.

Fuse.