It's honestly okay @Roussette
I recall a few scornful posts from @derxa about people who read tabloids.
Yet here she is, getting worked up over a story that she can only have read in a tabloid, or seen on tabloid news, GBNews, and misattributed it to Harry.
I would be embarrassed too, but I would have had the grace to say, oops, I made a mistake.
I would not do an even more embarrassing, attempted-face-saving deflection over two mistakes (including mistyping adulterer as adultery) that were edited while she was reading the post.
It is what it is.
Thanks @MissElinorDashwood and @skullbabe I will do a new Press thread, there's a lot to cover: what happens when KP can't control the media (Jamaica, Lionessgate and now New York), what happens when the UK media can't control the Harry and Meghan narrative as we saw with Invictus, recent headlines on Sky about Kate's "arrogance" , coming off the back of that big Sky interview...
There is a lot to unpack.
Need a bit of time to put the thread together (and ensure no typos😉) but should be up tomorrow.
Back to Thomas. The pro-Thomas posters here know he has been manipulated by the media to abuse Meghan for clicks. They don't care. Because it's Meghan, they believe she deserves every horrible thing happen to her.
It is what it is.