Harry is in town to fight against the Daily Mail - VIDEO

[vera99]

I'm sure we will all wish him well fighting the good fight against the Fail !
https://twitter.com/elliecostelloTV/status/1640274470395838465

I hope the claimants in this case get justice. However Meghan once asked about Harry, 'Is he kind?' and the answer is, 'No he isn't'.

Public breach of (reasonably expected) confidentiality is serious when you are dealing with a group of public figures. Luckily, the Royal Family have gone higher by not taking action against him (for now). That does not lessen the seriousness of what he has done.

'Is he kind?' and the answer is, 'Yes, he's loaded'.

Good point, @notanotheroneagain. MM’s win was important. Fingers crossed this group is also successful against the tabloids.

It’s a pity that Charles and William didn’t align themselves with Harry & the others against the tabloids as it would’ve benefited them, Camilla and Catherine.

Camilla & Charles have chosen instead to essentially merge with the tabloids by hiring Sun & Daily Fail editors onto their staff in the hopes of improving their image, especially Camilla’s. I it will ultimately backfire and simply tie Charles’ hands to protect himself, his sons, DILs, and grandchildren from press excesses in the future.

I presume it means a way of making money for 'take out'. Unless I have misunderstood. I don't think I have.

Camilla & Charles have chosen instead to essentially merge with the tabloids by hiring Sun & Daily Fail editors onto their staff in the hopes of improving their image, especially Camilla’s. I it will ultimately backfire and simply tie Charles’ hands to protect himself, his sons, DILs, and grandchildren from press excesses in the future.

Yes. They've already started with their provocative, shit stirring articles about KC + C and W + H.

The comment sections are already pushing back, calling them freeloaders etc.

In the absence of Meghan, the tabloids will simply move to the next target.

*W + K

Exactly, I said it was awful. But there's a difference in the press listening into his messages and taking things out of context to make him sound guilty and listening to him carrying out day to day admin. To him there's not much difference, his privacy has been intruded on. But if it's just general life admin, that's just the same as all the others who are suing so I'm not aghast or invested as I was 15 years ago.

Just seen on the news that Elton John, David Furnish and Baroness Lawrence also attended. Definitely meant to show they mean business.

I presume it means a way of making money for 'take out'.

I don't understand what that means.

I’m assuming these comments are satire 😂. Otherwise this reasoning makes zero sense. This lawsuit has been in the works for years. The judge chose the date the trial would start. Harry didn’t study Charles’ travel plans, then choose to show up for his own lawsuit prelims just to screw with Charles. 😂😂😂.

And Sadie Frost.

Elton John's home was tapped. His gardener and PA were targeted. The High Court also heard Sir Elton and Furnish had not seen a copy of their first child's birth certificate before it was allegedly unlawfully obtained by ANL.
"They were heartbroken by the derogatory headline that Associated attached to it, clearly calculated to profit and generate public sensation about an event that they had so carefully guarded to keep precious."

@Roussette Sadie frost is hardly a paragon to aspire to 😂

Must have been some small-minded bully…

Again - illegal things happening to people you don’t like are still illegal

But if it's just general life admin, that's just the same as all the others who are suing so I'm not aghast or invested as I was 15 years ago.

Do you never have private or personal conversation on your phone? It's just 'life admin'?

She deserves this then. OK.

irn bru more like 😂😂

Camilla & Charles have chosen instead to essentially merge with the tabloids by hiring Sun & Daily Fail editors onto their staff in the hopes of improving their image, especially Camilla’s. I it will ultimately backfire and simply tie Charles’ hands to protect himself, his sons, DILs, and grandchildren from press excesses in the future.

Yes, they decided I think, if you can’t beat them, join them. What is that guys name who used to be Williams head dude and then went to work for the tories, Simon? He’s still there… Simon Case? Something like that. Anyone seen his WhatsApp with Hancock? Awful man.

Sienna Miller was badly treated too, she settled because she didn’t have the money to go to trial. Her career was affected. They’re such horrible horrible soulless people running these tabloids.

It’s worse. Because they hacked his phone for mundane reasons - listening to his general day to day - and did not actively frame him - the poster does not care as
much as she would have done many years ago because it the same old story.

Comes laden with sugars

Please god let this case spell the end of the Daily Mail

I think the case is related to 'items' about them obtained illegally.
Presumably they have evidence.

OMG.
There is no conversation I've had on my phone that would be dreadful if it got published. Maybe some comments I'm not too proud of but nothing dire. However, would I want details revealed for everyone to see. No, I definitely wouldn't. And I'd sue and deserve my compensation. No one should have their phone illegally hacked. I don't know how many times I have to say this but there you go.
However, there's a big difference between that and being suspected of a crime and having conversations with people that could then be twisted. That could be absolutely devastating. I see people on here all the time saying there's no smoke without fire. Which is just a pile of poo. Of course there is.
So if revealing Jeffries' arrangements for coffee or not getting on with his sister in law is revealed, it'd intrusive and embarrassing for him but I wouldn't be aghast at it. I wouldn't even pay attention to it in the papers.
If, however, it's revealed that The Sun twisted information so that it made out that Jeffries had a hand in Yeates' death, I'd be disgusted. I wouldn't be shocked. I probably wouldn't even be aghast. I think got hardened to that when all this started years ago. But I'd be disgusted.

So about the settlement Harry was offered, when was that?