Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Lilibet christened and will be using the title Princess

1000 replies

miri1985 · 08/03/2023 12:25

What happened to just call me Harry? Why would they want their children to be burdened with titles?

“When reached by PEOPLE, a spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex said: "I can confirm that Princess Lilibet Diana was christened on Friday, March 3 by the Archbishop of Los Angeles, the Rev John Taylor."

people.com/royals/meghan-markle-prince-harry-daughter-princess-lilibet-christened-california/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
LadyVictoriaSponge · 08/03/2023 13:31

adrianmolesmole · 08/03/2023 13:24

Harry and Meghan made their choices, but the children deserve to be recognised as members of the RF, because they are. It's their birthright and I'm sure the parents didn't want to take that away from them, and it's not their right to do so, no matter how they may have chosen to live. It's probably Harry's way of keeping the family connections for his children, whatever his own relationship with them may be.

I'm sure the children's mental health will be fine, growing up with (some) freedom and privacy, unlike Harry's experience.

I think it's pretty shitty that not one of the crap four made an effort to come, yet they expect Harry to jump when he's called for the big Corona thingy.

If I was from a toxic, racist, bullying uncaring family I would do everything to ensure my child was not involved with them in anyway but then again I can’t merch my family for millions of dollars. Sophie and Edward’s children seem to be doing just fine without the Prince and Princess titles which is their ‘birthright’ and as for being brought up in privacy in LA? Don’t make me laugh.

SighsTheNewWord · 08/03/2023 13:31

Real ones unlike Katie's Price's daughter and the stupid boxer whose sons are all called Prince

What makes them real though? It's not as if there's a gene that means one is a natural born prince or princess. Once upon a time their ancestors were similar to Katie Price but they were stronger and defeated anyone who didn't think that way. Generations later, we now have people calling them real and others fake because the families choose to uphold that fakeness due to its benefits.

ScentOfAMemory · 08/03/2023 13:31

Eyerollcentral · 08/03/2023 13:19

Couldn’t agree more. I’m just saying Princess Lilibet sounds ridiculous. But then they used naming the child as a pr exercise as well didn’t they, I think they actually call her Lili, which begs the question why not just name her Lily??

@Eyerollcentral did you ask Charles and Diana why Henry is called Harry?

There was rumour back when they got married and everything was OK, that Diana, when she became Queen would probably be known as Frances as Diana wasn't considered royal enough.

Likewise Kate very sharply became Catherine.

stillavid · 08/03/2023 13:31

I do wonder if their spokesperson used the title or that was just added by the press. Especially as they got the title of the Bishop wrong.

ScentOfAMemory · 08/03/2023 13:32

His sister's funeral.

viques · 08/03/2023 13:32

So nasty to weaponise their kids like this. No need at all, it’s just piling all the spite and hurt onto the next generation to sort out in the future.

Nanatokidsdogshampsters · 08/03/2023 13:32

Is there actual proof that Charles, Camilla, William and Catherine were invited or
are we to believe H&Ms spokesman.

JenniferBarkley · 08/03/2023 13:32

Serenster · 08/03/2023 13:27

Archie and Lili became a prince and princess automatically the moment QEII died. The only news today is that their parents have apparently decided they will use the titles.

That’s not even telling half the story, though! There’s a whole load of relevant context we’re apparently expected to pretend never happened, then?

The whole point is that the context never matters. If Andrew had been born first, he'd be King right now regardless of all we know about him.

It's all automatic.

Character, history, personal relations. All irrelevant.

Inkpotlover · 08/03/2023 13:33

Nanatokidsdogshampsters · 08/03/2023 13:32

Is there actual proof that Charles, Camilla, William and Catherine were invited or
are we to believe H&Ms spokesman.

It wasn't the official spokesperson, it was the unofficial one, Omid Scobie.

thebellagio · 08/03/2023 13:33

OutOfChocolate · 08/03/2023 13:29

@thebellagio Tyler Perry told the press he was godfather. It should be his choice. We do not know who the other godparents are.

I completely agree it should be the godparent's choice to go public or not. Thats why I think in the Archie situation they could have just said "the godparents have requested that they retain their privacy which is why we won't be announcing it" If they'd done that, I think the press would have said "OK, fine"

It was the way they refused to state anything and acted as if the press were out of order for asking, when it had always been tradition that it just came across as picking a fight. To me, picking the small fights like those with the media gave them less leverage when they had something real to fight with them about (like printing Meghans letter to her dad)

stillavid · 08/03/2023 13:33

I must preface this by saying I have very lowbrow tv tastes but this is all getting a bit like Real Housewives of New Jersey.

AnotherSpare · 08/03/2023 13:34

I didn't expect King Charles would issue anything to prevent Harry's children from being entitled to a title. It would have been awkward, because he would then have had to de-title Beatrice, Eugenie, and the four surviving grandchildren of George V who are still prince/ess title holders.
However, after all of the fuss H&M created around not being working royals, its absolutely absurd that they are choosing to use the titles for their children when they could easily have just chosen not to, like Princess Anne did with her children.

MarshaMelrose · 08/03/2023 13:34

No, he didn't. That was his sisters funeral and those were his in-laws. He was 16. One year older than William was at his mother's. You think he could have told his older relatives what to wear?!

stillavid · 08/03/2023 13:34

@JenniferBarkley this is why the whole concept of a monarchy is quite mad isn't it?!

GiesAGonkYaDobber · 08/03/2023 13:35

If I was from a toxic, racist, bullying uncaring family I would do everything to ensure my child was not involved with them in anyway but then again I can’t merch my family for millions of dollars. Sophie and Edward’s children seem to be doing just fine without the Prince and Princess titles which is their ‘birthright’ and as for being brought up in privacy in LA? Don’t make me laugh.

Indeed Ladyvictoria

They had every opportunity to properly distance themselves. And they choose not to.

All about the merch.

Sweetpeasaremadeforbees · 08/03/2023 13:35

I do wonder if their spokesperson used the title or that was just added by the press. Especially as they got the title of the Bishop wrong.

Yes I wonder that. It seems a mad thing to do (to me). Surely it would have been more sensible for H and M to follow E and S's lead and say, yes our children are entitled to titles but we'll be leaving it to them to decide when they're 18.

Eyerollcentral · 08/03/2023 13:35

I’m totally anti royal but Jesus Christ, this was the funeral of his sister, her husband and their children including a new born baby born during an air crash where they all perished. He is clearly a teenage boy there. Germany wasn’t at war when that funeral took place. I actually think your post is in really poor taste. His sister was the closest thing he had to a mother when his own mother had been shipped off to an asylum and their father abandoned them, after they’d already fled Greece after being deposed. I am totally anti monarchy but it’s a bit rich people crowing about generational trauma when surely Phil must have been the OG of it.

Hooklander · 08/03/2023 13:35

Genevieva · 08/03/2023 13:26

@JenniferBarkley A lot of people think that, but it is not how Letters Patent work. I can't be bothered to explain why - it is a rather technical and boring area of law and I happen to think the whole thing is a meaningless house of cards anyway - but legally they are not 'Prince' or 'Princess' unless and until King Charles specifically declares them as such. When the Royal Family website changes then they will have officially have use of the titles.

Thank you, that is fascinating.

JenniferBarkley · 08/03/2023 13:35

stillavid · 08/03/2023 13:34

@JenniferBarkley this is why the whole concept of a monarchy is quite mad isn't it?!

Utterly bonkers. But very entertaining. They're my Kardashians.

bloodyplanes · 08/03/2023 13:36

What an entitled pair they are! Hating on the Royals but grasping on to those titles for dear life! Absolutely cringeworthy, im embarrassed for them!

sydneysunset · 08/03/2023 13:36

They certainly are entertaining 😂😂

Nanny0gg · 08/03/2023 13:36

adrianmolesmole · 08/03/2023 13:24

Harry and Meghan made their choices, but the children deserve to be recognised as members of the RF, because they are. It's their birthright and I'm sure the parents didn't want to take that away from them, and it's not their right to do so, no matter how they may have chosen to live. It's probably Harry's way of keeping the family connections for his children, whatever his own relationship with them may be.

I'm sure the children's mental health will be fine, growing up with (some) freedom and privacy, unlike Harry's experience.

I think it's pretty shitty that not one of the crap four made an effort to come, yet they expect Harry to jump when he's called for the big Corona thingy.

Their diaries are organised months ahead. I wonder when the invitation arrived

OutOfChocolate · 08/03/2023 13:36

SenecaFallsRedux · 08/03/2023 13:27

Or his change of denomination? The actual Archbishop of Los Angeles is Roman Catholic.

He is a bishop. It is the same

Serenster · 08/03/2023 13:37

Prince Philip actually attended a Nazi funeral !

Yes, in 1937 when he was 16 and his sister, her German noble husband and all their children, including her minutes-old newborn baby, perished in a plane crash on their way to a family wedding. Philips brother-in-law was in the Nazi party. As Germany was an authoritarian state, most people tended to be members of the Nazi party back then….

Of course, two years later, when war broke out, 18 year old Phillip spent the next 6 years fighting for the British against the Nazis, but why let small details like that derail you from an utterly ridiculous attempt at a smear.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread