Anti Charles protests on foodbank visit

[OutofEverything]

Protests greeted Charles latest visit to a foodbank at Milton Keynes. At least he wasn't egged this time.

I can understand that.
Mountbatten was clearly a prolific paedophile. There is loads of evidence. And this is supposed to be partly why the IRA killed him.
Andrew clearly lied in his TV interview over and over again. So the allegations against him are probably true.

Fawcett the Fence has been removed THREE times now
He'll be back

Right idea but possibly wrong tense, Roussette?
Considering Charles reportedly said that "he can manage without just about anyone except Michael" and is known to expect to have his own way, I find it very hard to believe Fawcett's not still involved - doubly so considering the stories he could probably tell if "disappointed" in any way

Mountbatten’s preference for boys, as opposed to men, was confirmed by his driver during the war, Norman Nield

It was confirmed by his valet Bill Evans too, OutofEverything; I knew him personally

Anyone with any decency would be ashamed that their subjects need food banks at all. They absolutely disgust me. Parasitic royals.

Yep Puzzled he's probably flying under the radar...fixing incognito

@Puzzledandpissedoff Thanks for that.
It is generally accepted that Mountbatten was an active paedophile by almost everyone except the most ardent royal defenders.

The thing is... Mountbatten had the luxury of no or little media reporting on him, a very different time, when all royals and those connected with them were revered without question.
If it's come to light all these decades later it must've been very bad.

You're defending murders by the IRA? Bloody hell. It wasn't just Mountbatten who was killed that day

They don't wipe his arse and they dont put toothpaste on his toothbrush!

I have mo problem with peoolecsaying they dont like someone but PA has been convicted of nothing. And apart from some FBI files based on g

@derxa “any money saved would disappear into a black hole”. I love it when people make these ridiculous statements with no evidence or backing whatsoever 🙄. It would go to the Treasury who, with a decent government, can spend it on public services. This stuff isn’t rocket science 🙄.

I don't think there's defending of that. A truly awful crime.
I would've preferred a no cover up justice system taking him to account. But being who he was, it would not have happened.
I think - from what I've read over the years - he was a deeply unpleasant man.

@derxa do you generally struggle with comprehension? Where is @OutofEverything defending the murders by the IRA?? 😬

That's why I said... "All but wipe his arse".
And I've never had a problem with the toothpaste myth, I think he'd broken his arm or something at the time.

But if you don't think every whim, every demand, every fancy..is not catered for by his aides, you are deluded.

3 boiled eggs sir? Choose yer fave !

Ugh. I hit post by accident.

I have no problem with people saying they don't like someone but I believe people should be at least charged before they are called offenders. Nothing to do with them being royal. A footballer, Mason Greenwood, just got charges dropped because of new evidence. I would equally stand up for him if people called him a rapist.

Mountbatten had the luxury of no or little media reporting on him, a very different time, when all royals and those connected with them were revered without question

Exactly, Roussette, and for all their own use of it these days I often think just how much they must hate social media and 24/7 news

TBF there are times I hate it too - like many tools it can be used for good or ill - but then I don't have an unmerited position to defend

We don't condone murder in this country no matter how unpleasant the person is.

If there's something much evidence, could you link some if it? Not the old FBI files based on gossip about his homosexuality. And really? The IRA were debating whether it would be a great coup to kill a relation of the RF and him being a paedophile tipped the balance. Tsk.

Probably doesn't mean definitely. That's why we have court systems weigh up evidence and not social media.

I believe people should be at least charged before they are called offenders

Agree with this too, Marsha; in any case it's hardly necessary to insist he's an offender, since for many his already known repulsive behaviour and befriending of a known paedophile is enough

Then again at least he's only befriended/supported one paedophile as far as we know, unlike his older brother who's done it with several

Seems to be something of a family habit

I don't condone murder either, and I am not sure why you have got that from my post

That's why we have court systems weigh up evidence and not social media.

That doesn't work too well with members of the RF.

The FBI file are just gossip. Not intelligence.

The files were put together in 1944. Homosexuality was illegal and homosexuals were held in disdain. Nowhere in the dossier does it say he was a paedophile, that's what Lownie surmised they are saying. We have no idea what age "young boys" refers to. But let's say it is actually children, there's no substantiation of anything. The only "evidence" was what one person said. Elizabeth de la Peor Beresford. It's just gossip from one person.

Anthony Daly. He doesn't know anything first hand. He says he "was told" so more unsubstantiated gossip.

I'd never heard of Norman Nield. I can't find his interview with the New Zealand Herald. But I agree, what he says carries weight for me. However Lowndes has said that the FBI files called LM a paedophile and they didn't, so I know that he takes licence to twist things. However, I feel sure NN must have said similar to what has been reported.

Kincorra House. That has been investigated and LM was held not responsible. Of course, it's perfectly possible it was a cover up by the powers that be. It's a dreadful period and I hope Arthur Smyth gets resolution and justice. As far as I know he's the only person to have made an allegation based on a recent realisation. I wish him the best.

LM has openly stated that he and his wife were promiscuous. But there's not a pile of evidence that he was a paedophile - just Norman Nields. So I can't say if he was not. I shall watch the court case and see the evidence there.

Dear oh dear...

Well if I paid a chef, I'd want them to cook me what I wanted, too. What's wrong with that?
I have a cleaner and each week I tell her what I'd like her to clean. 😱

I don't think the Americans care that PA is a member of the RF. Otherwise they'd have found a way to foil VG's court case.
Where are the FBI charges? Against anyone really.

Yeah 3 eggs!

P.s. HE doesn't pay for the chef

Yeah, everyone said that about Cliff Richard too when his name came up in Operation Yewtree and we all know how that turned out. It’s why we have rigour around evidence and proof in courts of law (important safeguards for all of us from trial by gossip and social media).

Also, Buckingham Palace went to the trouble of denying the boiled eggs story after it was published by Jeremy Paxman. Amusingly, that must have been one silly rumour too far for Prince Charles. 🤣

In 2012, the Prince of Wales website FAQ section said: “Does The Prince of Wales have seven boiled eggs cooked for his breakfast but only eat one, as claimed in Jeremy Paxman’s book On Monarchy?

“No, he doesn’t and never has done, at breakfast or any other time.”