There were two incidents over pens. One at Hillsborough Castle where it leaked. He was annoyed because he had to shake hands with people with ink on his hands. I'd be annoyed too.
By thecway, moaning to your wife is not a tantrum. 🙄
The other was at one of the most meaningful days of his reign, and the staff that organised it, put him in a small room with a table so tiny, it couldn't accommodate the document and the pen. That's a document that will be kept forever and he wants his signature to be right and he wants to enjoy the signing. And he couldn't. Out of all the rooms in St James Palace, that's the best they could come up with?! I wouldn't have hissed, I'd have sacked them.
By the way, hissing through through your teeth is not a tantrum. 🙄 Me sacking them would have been a (justified) tantrum.
I have never commented on Prince Andrew's actions. But I will say he is not an offender until he's been convicted. So far he's not even been charged, never mind convicted, and his accuser decided not to take him to court.
I believe it was Charles' secretary that was talking about some sort of honour. Whatever, its totally wrong to buy an honour - despite what happens within our main political parties. If Charles was involved and Mubarak received an honour (did he?), Charles should be rebuked for it. And to add, I have no objection to foreign donors giving money to charity projects in this country, but it should be done in an appropriate way.
There is no evidence that Louis Mountbatten was either a paedophile or raped anyone. There is a court case pending based on the claims of one man but LM is not around to defend himself. If the man was indeed a victim of LM, I hope he gets justice.
I don't, however, see what it has to do with Charles at all. Are you saying that if your uncle, grandmother, brother committed a crime, you should be held culpable too? So if your mum got done speeding, the police should put points on your licence? You'd be happy with that? That sounds a bit bonkers to me!