25page doc debunking bullying lies

[notanotheroneagain]

Ok, so tell me, why is the media who are always so forensic about H&M are not investigating and following up on what was on that report where H&M submitted that there was no bullying?

Why didn't the 'palace source' leak this document?

They usually give us a blow by blow account on anything negative about the couple.

I suspect this 25 page document will be in the next book from Harry 🙄

And as you heard in court, it was Jason who spoke to Scobie, not H&M themselves. He admitted that. And JK was feeding OS a pack of lies. And H&M prayed whoever this guy is tells the truth.
They did not know who he was.
Even OS always said as such. He was going around getting info from staff etc.

The judge saw through this and did not charge MM for perjury.

So while technically bosses of JK, H&M had to say such, but he seems to have been working against them. One of the traps of the palace, I guess.

I’ve just read that three times and I’m still none the wiser. I’d anyone else understood it, please could you translate for this bear of little brain?

If, not I’d, ffs!

Maybe, go have a little nap? and a catch up on the books, court case and story of H&M. Think that will help.

Maybe write literately, that would help a lot.

@notanotheroneagain - why does Finding Freedom sound like Meghan’s voice? It really doesn’t sound as if it’s been filtered through two separate people.

Spare is different: a ghostwriter’s job is to ape the “author’s” voice, but Finding Freedom is not that.

*And as you heard in court, it was Jason who spoke to Scobie, not H&M themselves. He admitted that. And JK was feeding OS a pack of lies. And H&M prayed whoever this guy is tells the truth.
They did not know who he was.
Even OS always said as such. He was going around getting info from staff etc. *

Jason testified that the book was regularly discussed at work. Including directly with Meghan. She gave him several briefing points to share with Omid for the purpose of him writing the book.

She said: "I accept that Mr Knauf did provide some information to the authors for the book and that he did so with my knowledge, for a meeting that he planned for with the authors in his capacity as communications secretary.

By the way. That quote is directly from her testimony during the court case when she apologised for "misleading the court"

The fact that the Harkles haven't published it speaks volumes!

😂

The judge saw through this and did not charge MM for perjury.

The reason Meghan wasn't charged 'for' perjury is not because the judge believed she was not lying, but because her lie did not affect the substance of the case.

But T hey went on record for Meghan saying they didn’t catch her dog mid poo
😂

www.thecut.com/2018/09/palace-denies-meghan-markles-dog-was-photographed-mid-poo.html

Can you prove Meghan didn’t make Kate cry?
We know Meghan cried alone in the house, only witnessed by Harry.

So how can Harry and Meghan know that Kate wasn’t also crying elsewhere?

Maybe the palace couldn’t be arsed to comment on a story between the two of them, and like to keep their comments light, about Botox and dog shit

The judge didn’t ‘see though’ anything.

Its similar to the Rebekah Vardy/Colleen Rooney case.
RV thought she’d get away with it, using the same logic. It was her assistant, not her.
She lost though, because the judge saw through the thin excuse, and knew her assistant was acting on her orders. Meghan won in a simple copyright law, her credibility didn’t come into it, because it was a pretty open and shut case. But had this trial proceeded, it would have affected her credibility massively.

there’s a term for it: Falsus in uno, Falsus in omnibus.

(I think it might even have been the same judge? But I might be making that up!)

The Behaviour panel picked up on that point too. When OW asked M ‘did you make K cry’ and M said an emphatic no, they pointed out M couldn’t no if K cried privately. They also said the way M looked directly at OW when answering wasn’t a good sign.

Well the story was put out that MM made KM cry, not they both made each other cry.

'behaviour panel' sounds like saying 'Lady C' or 'Tom Bower' said.

How come it was not confirmed that MM did make KM cry as well later then? What was KM giving apology flowers to MM if MM too was at fault?

Kate’s a grown up who wanted to smooth things over days before a big wedding, no matter the rights and wrings of it?

How the fucking hell do we know who made who cry and why???

How come it was not confirmed that MM did make KM cry as well later then?

’confirmed’ by who? Kate hasn’t commented at all.

I don’t know why I’m still discussing this actually, who really gives a fuck who made who cry however many years ago?!?

We know Meghan briefs the papers as well.

Even the judge said in the court judgment that the claimants team ‘enthusiastically briefed’ the press on the trial proceedings

As if KM is not talking via the 'palace source'.

She talks all the time, and started all this.

Sorry, the words were ‘energetically briefing’.

‘Indeed, there is evidence to support the defendant’s assertion that the claimant’s side have been energetically briefing the media about these proceedings from the outset’

Mentioned how Obid Scobie tweeted the contents a mere 15 minutes after Meghan and her team received it 😂

Also mentions further down Meghan and the mail were engaging in ‘tit for tat’ and both leaking and briefing, while accusing the other side of doing it

"What was KM giving apology flowers to MM if MM too was at fault?"

Who says they were "apology flowers?" They were presumably a peace offering; a sign of class.

Kate "started all this?" Oh ffs, grow up! You know NOTHING about this.

Neither do you

Anyway, as far as I can see, the Sussexes' reputation here and internationally is wrecked.

Meghans been leaking against Kate since 2017 😂

www.laineygossip.com/Didnt-offer-a-ride-blind-riddle/46293