Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Mega coronation

248 replies

GooseberryCinnamonYogurt · 22/01/2023 08:15

Do we really need it? My first thought is no we don't, the money would be better spent on the NHS!

OP posts:
Roussette · 22/01/2023 09:55

ReneBumsWombats · 22/01/2023 09:37

You cannot do a "nice, quiet" coronation for the King of the UK and Commonwealth realms. It's not a birthday party. It's of more public and global interest than his wedding to Camilla. There needs to be something worth seeing.

We don't get coronations very often, so for all the legitimate concerns about the costs of the RF, I'm not particularly bothered about this.

Why are we more special than all other European Royal Houses who don't have public spectacle coronations?

We can easily do nice and quiet. Charles doesn't want that though.

AutumnCrow · 22/01/2023 09:57

OhIdoLike2bBesideTheSeaside · 22/01/2023 09:46

And Diana Ross
That was preety awful too

My worst fear is Diana Ross on stage duetting with Sam Smith.

Firkinhavinalaugh · 22/01/2023 10:00

On the plus side - if you aren’t a fan - sustainable British company’s will be involved, many hospitality business will have a boost from local and tourist trade (at a time when cafes/pubs/restaurants are closing at an alarming rate)

All that will (hopefully) filter through the economy and into much needed services.

There is so much doom and gloom everywhere, not everyone wants to feel like that :)

ReneBumsWombats · 22/01/2023 10:01

Roussette · 22/01/2023 09:55

Why are we more special than all other European Royal Houses who don't have public spectacle coronations?

We can easily do nice and quiet. Charles doesn't want that though.

We're not them. We have a different protocol and culture. They do theirs, we do ours.

You are really overestimating the amount of influence Charles' personal preferences have on this. It's a state event with many precedents.

Lizziet64 · 22/01/2023 10:01

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Mindymomo · 22/01/2023 10:06

It’s going to happen whether you like it or not. Tourism will bring in a lot of money for London and the UK in general. We’ve booked a 10 day holiday in the peak district, we will be able to get away from it all.

DrWhoNowww · 22/01/2023 10:06

Wills and Kate’s wedding apparently generated around £2billion for the economy.

Harty and Meghans apparently generated around £1billion.

If the coronation can generate the same then it’s money well spent surely? As a PP said, it’s unlikely Charles has much personal impact on scale as it will be used as an advert of post-brexit Britain.

As for the NHS…maybe it would be in a much better state if the mythical £350million a week had surfaced…maybe we should be holding the government to account over that rather than getting distracted by a coronation?

Tyrozet · 22/01/2023 10:07

I fair enjoy Coronation Chicken - I wonder if they'll come up with something as good this time around?

MarshaMelrose · 22/01/2023 10:08

This reply has been deleted

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

He provided her food, housing, clothes, travel round the world. That's more than my father in law ever did. What more does she want?

StarsSand · 22/01/2023 10:09

YetMoreNewBeginnings · 22/01/2023 08:57

All this for a king who expressed a desire to be a tampon?

I’m not the biggest fan of the guy, but why do people continually do that? It’s a complete misrepresentation of what he said. He did not express a desire to be a tampon at all.

CHARLES: Oh, God. I'll just live inside your trousers or something. It would be much easier!

CAMILLA (laughing): What are you going to turn into, a pair of knickers? (Both laugh). Oh, you're going to come back as a pair of knickers.

CHARLES: Or, God forbid, a Tampax. Just my luck! (Laughs)

Yeah I don't think it's fair to keep holding that against him. It was a playful and silly comment said in what should have been a private call.

That said I think the monarchy should be abolished and the whole spectacle is obscene.

The tampon comment is the least often thing about this lot.

MonsoonMadness · 22/01/2023 10:11

MarshaMelrose · 22/01/2023 10:08

He provided her food, housing, clothes, travel round the world. That's more than my father in law ever did. What more does she want?

Worship. She’s Very Special.

watchfulwishes · 22/01/2023 10:12

I am going to find the juxtaposition of the hugely expensive pomp against the backdrop of a really hard time for the country very uncomfortable.

RoseHansBolo · 22/01/2023 10:13

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

C8H10N4O2 · 22/01/2023 10:13

purpledalmation · 22/01/2023 09:11

I wonder what changed from it being scaled down? It is far less that his mothers coronation in terms of people invited.

Nothing. Charles has always lived his life like a potentate of old - he was never going to have a "slimmed down" or European style celebration, it was just the PR and part of the haste to consolidate a new King who was decidedly less popular than the late Queen (ditto the indecent haste of announcing the new PoW at a time when even those who objected were likely to stay silent).

Just like all the PR around "Camilla won't be Queen" when he married his former mistress was just PR

Just like all the PR about the £100m cost will boost the economy (it might boost the economy of China, producing all the souvenir tat) when the cost of a single bank hol to the economy is between £2-2.5 billion depending on whose stats you use.

MadameSzyszkoBohusz · 22/01/2023 10:16

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

What it needs is for 22% of its population - including 4.3 million children- to not be living in poverty. But that's not going to happen whilst cap-doffing blinkered bootlickers support these kind of show-boating obscenities, and continue celebrating that inbred over-privileged family of morons.

Mulhollandmagoo · 22/01/2023 10:16

I do feel like he could have planned a much smaller celebration to be honest, I think it could have been made just as nice if some thought was put into it.

I really like the 'lasting legacy' idea though!

Theunamedcat · 22/01/2023 10:18

How do we know this is Charles idea? The government have always forced the royal family hand remember when diana died? The boys were being protected in Balmoral Blair demanded they returned to London and they were put on display that was the government not the royals

GooseberryCinnamonYogurt · 22/01/2023 10:20

Allthegoodnamesarechosen · 22/01/2023 08:50

Self indulgent nonsense. They are both old enough to know that a nice quiet ceremony might be more in keeping with the public mood.

You'd think so wouldn't you. No idea how the peasants live.

OP posts:
GooseberryCinnamonYogurt · 22/01/2023 10:20

ShippingNews · 22/01/2023 09:06

All this for a king who expressed a desire to be a tampon? And I take it that you've never said something cringey during a private conversation with a lover?

Sure but I wasn't in line to the throne and an adulterer.

OP posts:
sashagabadon · 22/01/2023 10:21

I’m looking forward to it! What’s not to like? I didn’t see the queens coronation and I might not get to see william’s so it might be the only one for me!

Ridemeginger · 22/01/2023 10:22

MarshaMelrose · 22/01/2023 10:08

He provided her food, housing, clothes, travel round the world. That's more than my father in law ever did. What more does she want?

He should have bought and gifted her London Zoo, so that she can talk and sing to all the animals.

Roussette · 22/01/2023 10:24

ReneBumsWombats · 22/01/2023 10:01

We're not them. We have a different protocol and culture. They do theirs, we do ours.

You are really overestimating the amount of influence Charles' personal preferences have on this. It's a state event with many precedents.

What precedents? Charles can have the Coronation he wants. The last one was 70 years ago, there are no precedents

ReneBumsWombats · 22/01/2023 10:25

GooseberryCinnamonYogurt · 22/01/2023 10:20

Sure but I wasn't in line to the throne and an adulterer.

When both parties had affairs because the marriage was miserable for them both, when the kids are now middle aged and married with kids of their own and when the errant couple have now been married for longer than the first marriage lasted...it's time to move on past stuff that happened while Margaret Thatcher was PM and Agadoo was in the charts.

MarshaMelrose · 22/01/2023 10:28

This reply has been deleted

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

Because you said he didn't have enough money to look after her. But he clearly did look after her.

vera99 · 22/01/2023 10:34

Ridemeginger · 22/01/2023 10:22

He should have bought and gifted her London Zoo, so that she can talk and sing to all the animals.

No that's for the Dolittles 😝

www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1258913/kate-middleton-news-prince-william-duchess-of-dolittle-baldy-royal-family-latest-spt