Why are interviewers not calling Harry out on his "version" of events?

[Kateforqueen]

The interviewers are very soft on him. Is he hand picking who interviews him & are they getting a list of off limit questions. Eg the Queen mother story

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11620265/Pictures-place-Prince-Harry-Switzerland-Queen-Mother-died-NOT-Eton-recalls.html

Why isn't he challenged?

@notanotheroneagain you are hilarious 🤣🤣🤣 Eton was closed for the Easter holidays, Harry was skiing in Switzerland, the Queen mother died & news was released immediately. He claimed he was in Eton. Are suggesting that he was in Eton alone all (remember Eton was closed for the Easter holidays...) then KC & Charles popped by in their private jet, whizzed off to Switzerland, got suited & booted, photographed, got back in the plane & landed Harry back in Eton again..
Has Harold been sharing his drugs with you?

😮 at the conspiracy theory around QM's death.

Isn't it more likely that he received some bad news from a courtier once at school and is misremembering it as that occasion? Or the drugs have messed up his brain and affected his recollection ?

With all the threads you create each day about H&M, you come across as awfully bitter and lonely. But despite this, you persist. Perhaps you should follow your own advice. But then how would you fill your days?

Like the episode of Motherland where Julia turns up to an empty school on the hols with the kids🤣
I can just just imagine KC @marcopront "What do you mean you're closed for the holidays? My taxpayers are paying good money for my sons education... Do you mean to tell me there are no after school clubs running this week?"

Who the actual fuck edited and fact checked this book??? Very basic things like him being a direct descendant of King Henry VI haven’t been checked. I read this online but even I could have told him he wasn’t a direct descendant and actually being a direct descendant in the RF is a fairly recent phenomenon (in the co text of royal history) when centuries ago kings would sue childless so the crow would be passed to their brothers/sisters/nephews/nieces etc

@Sayitagainmyl I am calling H&M out on all the bullshit & I am loving every second. You H&M bots are getting very frustrated when their bullshit & fabrications are exposed😂
This section is for royal family threads & I will discuss H&M to my hearts content. If it bothers you so much fuck off😘

So basically he can say anything he likes, regardless of accuracy or factual basis and it counts has 'his truth'.

Bloody hell. That just an excuse to make shit up and accuse people of doing things they never did, because it suits his narrative. Shocking abuse of his power and influence.

And there are people here who will believe him whatever.

@marcopront & they are getting very abusive & aggressive to those calling out his lies & bullshit!

It just proves to many of us that the site’s founder was absolutely correct in her assessment of the mental faculties of some of its audience. I feel quite sorry for someone that needs to entertain themselves by deluding themselves that they are negatively impacting the lives of others who are clearly doing much better than them. It’s clear evidence that you don’t have much of a life. Who would choose to live like that by choice?

@Sayitagainmyl & here you are, still here commenting, busy life you have by the looks of it 🤣
I am not going to lie, I find the shitshow, lies & inaccurate recollections hilarious. It's a cold, miserable January & the Sussex pair is so much more entertaining than Eastenders, I won't apologise😜

@Kateforqueen Again, not seeking my entertainment by deluding myself that I am impacting the lives of others who are doing better than myself. But if you do want to know how I will be filling my day today – I will soon be going to my midwife’s appointment as my DP and I will soon be welcoming the first addition to our family. Another source of happiness in our lives. But why am I telling you this, when it’s obvious you can’t relate. I won’t ask how you’ll be spending the remainder of your day as that’s already been established.

So basically he can say anything he likes, regardless of accuracy or factual basis and it counts as 'his truth'

Almost, Wheresthebeach, except that he's now gone further and said that "There's just as much truth in what I remember and how I remember it as there is in so called objective facts"

Almost worrying that there are still people who'll try to defend this sort of thing, but then I try to be fair and it can't be easy for the less balanced fans to see Harry behaving like this, and remembering the insults they've flung in his defence

Enjoy 😘

I feel quite sorry for someone that needs to entertain themselves by deluding themselves that they are negatively impacting the lives of others who are clearly doing much better than them.

I agree, I feel sorry for Harry too, but hopefully now he can retreat and get the help he needs.

I agree. Princess Margaret died a couple of months before the queen mother didn't she? Maybe he's confused how he found out about the two.

Harry's ghostwriter tweeted this from the Prince Of Wails.

He and everyone else should read the work of Elizabeth Loftus on the science of memory.

Basically, anything you remember that cannot be corroborated in an independent way should be treated in a sceptical manner. That corroboration can come through relatives, newspaper articles, photos and so on. But it has to be independent of the person, in this case Harry himself.

Given this and the lies, misrepresentations and distortions the Sussexes have been caught in, nobody should be taking a word they say at face value.

What you believe about your life is NOT on the same level as objective facts and evidence. Nowhere near.

He said it there himself in the quote... fables🤣
What an absolute clown🤡

So I'm trying to get my head around this, Harry is claiming that any thing that comes from his mind is his truth and holds the same weighing as objective fact. So we should essentially take it as gospel/true. So what ever is published from him as the source then its true.

But any thing that has been in the media is false narrative as its leaked from his family. But would that also mean no matter what its published in the media ie his family or a family source that is their recollection from their own mind and there for holds the same weighting as objective fact. So we should also believe them according to harry`s own definition and calculations.

Alternatively every thing harry says should be taken with a pinch of salt just like the media/newspapers and Harry is just as guilty of fake narrative and full of shit.

I think Harry's been smoking weed with Kelly Anne Conway.

@rumship I don’t think he’s saying everyone should take it as ‘the’ truth - just ‘his’ truth.

What he is saying is sort of in line with theories of relativism/postmodernism in social sciences. Which have themselves been challenged - but it isn’t totally ‘out there’ thinking ( and it’s not totally out of line with theories on memories being unreliable - I think he is acknowledging that. Where he goes further is with the last line about ‘objective facts’ - although it’s also true that there are far less ‘objective’ facts that we instinctively think there are.)

There's no way Harry would ever consent to being interviewed by a real journalist (Toady Tom doesn't count).

The royal family should deploy someone totally expendable, say Princess Michael of Kent or one of those Gloucester ones, to somewhere like The Ivy where they can proceed to say loads of outrageous things about Harry within earshot of several drunken journalists. Things like he once queued up with the old dears for a cup of tea outside Daniel O'Donnell's house and then tried to assassinate him with a boomerang, or that he has lovechild twins with Sinitta who are being brought up in a Tibetan monastery, or that he thinks foxes, seals and pedal bins are communicating with him, or that he rubs Elizabeth Arden Eight-Hour cream on his knob while thinking of his dead mother ......... Hang on, I'm getting a bit confused. When doorstepped by the press, said royal should just smile wearily and say, 'Well, memory is a fluid and elastic concept, and these are merely things that I recall.'

Prince Michael's wife would be even better 😩

Isn't she already in trouble because she wore some kind of racist necklace to her first meeting with Meghan?

You know very well, almost all boarding schools are not closed at Easter (I should know, some of my DC are in some). He was not in Eton alone, there are always stuff and their children during holidays - not that we know if QM died during holidays.

Everyone was against Camilla at the time, so him being 'single' does not count. He was with the OW, and royalists are conservative and would throw up at that thought.

As I said, you (and the press) let this go.

You don't want H being pressed to come up with more details. You will be more angry with the revelations as a result.

Just leave it !