Why are interviewers not calling Harry out on his "version" of events?

[Kateforqueen]

The interviewers are very soft on him. Is he hand picking who interviews him & are they getting a list of off limit questions. Eg the Queen mother story

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11620265/Pictures-place-Prince-Harry-Switzerland-Queen-Mother-died-NOT-Eton-recalls.html

Why isn't he challenged?

I've read most of the book and find myself very sympathetic to Harry. I wasn't based on the extracts I'd read in advance.

I thought that in the paragraph where he talked about receiving the xbox (now shown to be factually wrong) he explained quite well how his memory was messed up and things were all out of sequence. I felt for him. I didn't think he was saying "I got an xbox on xyz date", I thought he was using it as an example of how confused he was.

And I am not surprised he was confused, having read how he felt after his mum's death and how badly he was supported through that.

Poor lad. No wonder he's such a mess.

I'm not sure why so many people worship this family and hold them up to be an example for us all. They're so dysfunctional.

I would not want this life for my children in a million years.

Notanotheroneagain 😂

Are you seriously suggesting KC set up a photo roll call to show he loves/is a good father to Harry in 2002 in case he was ever to need evidence in case Harry was ever to suggest he wasn't?

Batshit

It's all about how things look.

The RF is working on PR overdrive, currently.

Including sending that Patronella woman to go lie on GMB and say Camilla and Charles affair had ended when he got married, when we all know she was giving him a bj on his wedding eve day. And saying Diana had affairs first, when this is absolutely not true.

twitter.com/DeelightRI/status/1602338668991111168

Harry & Meghan have created this "my truth" and "factual truth" bollocks to support their attacks against named individuals.
I would love to see them both in court defending their version of events based on this anomaly.
There is only one "Truth".

Including sending that Patronella woman to go lie on GMB and say Camilla and Charles affair had ended when he got married, when we all know she was giving him a bj on his wedding eve day. And saying Diana had affairs first, when this is absolutely not true.

Surely Petronella's truth is just as valid as "so-called objective facts"? Don't forget, there's no such thing as a lie, according to Harry.

It would be absolutely fine for his work of fiction to be his truth if not for the fact that his truth, aka absolute bollocks in some cases, were not so potentially damaging to other people.
No matter what your personal feelings are towards Harry or any other member of the family, his distortions, sold as truth, are hurtful to others.

It’s a publicity drive. It’s not meant to be serious investigative journalism/interviewing.

When you have to invent an utterly pointless conspiracy about the QM's death that would have pulled in doctors, a coroner, all her staff and countless officials and civil servants, none of which has ever leaked out - you really are showing your desperation.

No.
I am suggesting that he may have been doing something wrong (like shagging Camilla)when the qm died. Whatever it was, it could not come out. Just as it could not come out that H was told by a courtier, rather than his father for family member.

So the announcement was only made when he was at a place where he made sure he is seen.

This is a family that has sold lots of lies about Diana (her mh etc.). They will outPR you anytime to keep up appearances.

None of those people said anything about the death date.

Ahaha seriously stop with the lunacy. FGS what utter claptrap. Isn’t there a thread somewhere about bison/sea serpents/whatever the fuck else where you could all pass your tin foil hats around instead of subjecting all of us to the nonsense?

Diana did have difficulties with her mental health, btw.

@notanotheroneagain

My point being that Queen mother could have died any other day but that. I suspect the announcement of the actual date of her death had to be PR'd somehow.

*Charles did a photoshoot with the boys that day as an airtight alibi that he was a loving father doing his fatherly duties.

The statement even goes further to say 'the queen wanted this news out immediately'. *

So your version is

Charles finds out his grandmother has died.
He flies to Switzerland with his sons and does a photo shoot
He puts Harry (and William?) on a plane back to the UK and goes to shag Camilla
Someone persuades Eton to open during the holiday for Harry to go there
Then someone calls Harry to tell him.
Twenty years when Harry tells this story he forgets the part about being in Switzerland

It seems very complicated.

@notanotheroneagain

My point being that Queen mother could have died any other day but that. I suspect the announcement of the actual date of her death had to be PR'd somehow.

*Charles did a photoshoot with the boys that day as an airtight alibi that he was a loving father doing his fatherly duties.

The statement even goes further to say 'the queen wanted this news out immediately'. *

So your version is

Charles finds out his grandmother has died.
He flies to Switzerland with his sons and does a photo shoot
He puts Harry (and William?) on a plane back to the UK and goes to shag Camilla
Someone persuades Eton to open during the holiday for Harry to go there
Then someone calls Harry to tell him.
Twenty years when Harry tells this story he forgets the part about being in Switzerland

It seems very complicated.

He wouldn't have had to cover up shagging Camilla, because it wasn't wrong for him to do so and it was no secret that he was. He was a free agent. Give it up, even your hero admits he got facts wrong.

I think the book has only just come out after a week of leaks. Etiquette probably demands that you have to be fair to the publishers and give the best conditions to make people want to read it. If an interviewer gets Harry to say," I don't know. I wasn't thinking straight. I just felt I should get it written that way, and the publishers were pushing", that is hardly fair. Be harsh and forensic in questioning him, once the sales drive has had a chance to get underway.

Apologies for posting twice and saying what others had said.

A doctor certified her date of death, FFS. When she died, all those people were in the know, and if she had died earlier and an incorrect date of death been given, they would have known that. Cover-ups that rely on a lot of people keeping quiet never work. Not one of them has said "Actually she died several days earlier but we had to cover it up in case Harry wanted to slag off his father 20 years later".

@notanotheroneagain

None of those people said anything about the death date.

They don't need to but it your version was correct, they would.

The issue is not so much about who told Harry but where he was.

Do you believe he was at Eton or in Switzerland?

Why is it wrong for a single man to be shagging his girlfriend? And anyway, if he was, how would anyone know? He'd just get dressed and leave the house to go wherever. What is there to cover up?

Why would you go down a convoluted lane of a conspiracy theory, involving a mass cover up of multiple people, lying and breaking the law, rather than just believe Harry when he says his memory is unreliable.

Your conjecture is bonkers.

I doubt he'll be giving interviews then.

Lawyers for the various opponents in the Sussex's legal cases must be celebrating. As soon as he takes the oath, they're going to have a field day asking him about "his truth" and "objective truth".

Just as it could not come out that H was told by a courtier, rather than his father for family member.

You make no sense. They told him via a courtier but were so worried that it might come out if Harry wrote a memoir 20 years later that they delayed the announcement of the QM's death, set up a photoshoot in Switzerland to show how fatherly Charles was and then announced it and flew them home again?

Wouldn't it have been easier to just get a family member to tell him, given that he was 3 miles down the road from Windsor Castle? He is wrong about this. He was not told on the phone by a courtier while he was at school on Easter Saturday. Accept and move on.

Exactly. It should also be remembered that he was 17, we are not talking about vague flashes from early childhood which can genuinely be random and confused.