Jeremy Clarkson

[kirinm]

Is a piece of shit. I refuse to link to his article in which he explicitly says he hates her and can't wait for the day he can physically assault her.

Can the Kate sycophants tell me again how this all happened to her and is totally normal and acceptable?

I don’t think attending an event means Camilla necessarily agrees with Piers Morgan. But Piers Morgan spends so much of his time ranting about Meghan and Harry that I do think it was a poor decision to attend if she knew he was there. His only mission in life seems to be to pull Meghan and Harry apart. He is a ridiculous man who had become a caricature of himself. Regardless of opinions, anyone would do well to distance themselves from people like that.

You can attend a large gathering and not come within spitting distance of certain others there. In fact it’s the perfect kind of gathering to attend if you want to avoid someone else there.

I actually think all Clarkson article will result in will be support and sympathy for Meghan. My son popped to our local shop earlier and he said there were a few people saying they’re not Meghan fans but the article is too much.

I expect he was imagining exactly how much rage this would provoke amongst people who don't like the joke

I disagree @Anklespraying . I think he simply wrote exactly what he thinks. The fact that it would cause outrage was a bonus. He doesn't care whether or not he is liked or vilified. He only likes the sound of his own voice.

See my comments about the 4.4 billion dollars of revenue for 80 hours of Game of Thrones most of which was basically the humiliation of women for male fantasising whether in bed or on the sofa.

This. Not a good look to be seen hobnobbing with the man known as Meghan's most obsessed, spurned bully. It might not have been her event but she'd have known who was invited and didn't have to go. That was a choice.

the thing is, turn that around and that is exactly what Harry and Meghan did in the Oprah interview. They knew their insinuation of a "racist" comment - unproven - would stir a whole load of shit up over here, together with all their other provable lies, but went ahead because it gave good viewing figures. Meghan certainly likes the sound of her own voice and the Sussex approach tends to be, any publicity is good publicity. Which is why we had Oprah, and interviews, and podcasts and netflix.....

Nor is he clever enough to make a 'joke' . He has simply taken someone else's idea and used it. Laziness. No joke. No layers. Appropriation of a popular reference - lazy 'journalism'.

Perhaps Camilla wanted to meet Judi Dench. Why should she hide away because of MN disapproval?

Since she and Judi are close friends, I'm sure it could have been arranged some other way. But then I believe she's friendly with Clarkson and Morgan too.

SallyLockheart nothing that M or H said or did had any impact on JC.
What JC wrote was directed specifically at M. It was personal, grotesque and directed at M alone.

Did your husband enjoy the rape scene in GoT?
What the fuck are you on about?
@Anklespraying

so you are the friendship police are you?

So because lots of people enjoyed watching a programme depicting the fictional humiliation of female characters, ergo it’s OK to speculate about the fictional humiliation of a single real-life woman?

There's a lot of condemnation on twitter actually for JC with references also made to disappointment with the Royal Family. I think the RF don't realise that people are becoming less reliant on the tabloids who twist the truth. People can find the truth easily without the printed press.

Why bring Camilla into this? Why does she have to hide away and not attend an event that she wants to go to (ignoring the fact this party occurred before the article was printed) because two of the anti Meghan brigade were in attendance? She doesn’t pick the guest list. Why is she being held responsible or culpable for something SHE hasn’t said. The responsibility lies solely with Jeremy Clarkson (and Piers Morgan) yet people are bringing Camilla into the equation 🙄

It’s so irrational.

It's becoming a pattern with Camilla. Hired an ex Daily Mail staffer. Angela Levin who traffics in conspiracy theories about Meghan was given access to a tour/close friends to write an unauthorised biography. Now lunching with Piers and Jeremy, doesn't paint a good picture.

It's becoming a pattern with Camilla. Hired an ex Daily Mail staffer. Angela Levin who traffics in conspiracy theories about Meghan was given access to a tour/close friends to write an unauthorised biography. Now lunching with Piers and Jeremy, doesn't paint a good picture

Yes - she's not coming across lily white.

I don't know what you mean by ok?

It's quite clearly a human behaviour that is popular and mainstream. The woman from Bake off hosted the live fan show, she seemed to absolutely love it.

Haha so you think any one cares about what people say on twitter, it's a cesspit and always will be. Please don't delude yourself twitter has any bearing on real life or is a medium to change public opinion.

😂

hate to disappoint you but twitter is real life

twitter isn't real life!! correction!

"Haha so you think any one cares about what people say on twitter, it's a cesspit and always will be. Please don't delude yourself twitter has any bearing on real life or is a medium to change public opinion"

Haha to you too! You need to know where to go and who to read - much like on here.

@tatalan With all due respect, suspicious patterns don’t equal proof, just as correlation doesn’t equal cause.