Jeremy Clarkson

[kirinm]

Is a piece of shit. I refuse to link to his article in which he explicitly says he hates her and can't wait for the day he can physically assault her.

Can the Kate sycophants tell me again how this all happened to her and is totally normal and acceptable?

Spot on.

My dishwasher is way more intelligent than Prince Andrew and is in fact squeaky clean. Unlike him.

Jesus @wishingyouwell he isn't a moral lighthouse, he gets paid to write about specific people. Ah you know what I'll have to leave that with you.

Well inorder for that I would need to know who the so called child abuser is? As far as I'm aware no one in the royal family is a convicted child abuser. Care to provid some evidence of this before you try to send people off on a fantasy search.

Guilty until proven innocent in this country, twitter is not a court and being cancelled and guilty by social media is not something I recognise.

But if that is your MO then at least I can ignore you completely.

If you don't know who the paedophile in the RF is I'm afraid I can't help you.

Ironically all those shouting “free speech! hE’s AlLoWeD tO bE mYsOgInIsTiC” seem very against everyone else’s free speech to decry him. And also fundamentally misunderstand what the right to free speech means.

The fact that camilla invited him and piers Morgan to her cosy lunch speaks volumes about how she feels about H and M.

@wishingyouwell oh so your not willing to say. Now there a turn up for the books.

So how can JC write an article about a convicted proven child abuser if there is no court or criminal charges. There for you have answered your own question he cannot.

You might have a point but that upper lower case writing style is so irritating

who u talking bout? 😃

Where do you draw the line? Suggesting he wishes something vile and humiliating and illegal would happen to someone because he doesn’t like them it’s not just an opinion. An opinion is “I don’t like x and here is why.” Wishing something truly horrific happens to is something else entirely.

I don't think it was Camilla's lunch, tbf.

@rasberry and yet when he was paid to write about the male paedophile, he didn't mention cellular hate or scenes of violence he had imagined did he?
Why do you think he incites hatred and violence towards the non-criminal woman and leaves the male paedophile to be?

Oh, I know. But it’s all I can see in certain posters’ remarks. Whether the quite bright troll or the one who doesn’t know the difference between your and you’re, they all sound like tHiS.

I'd also love to see where the facts are anyone is a convicted paedophile, care to back up your claim. That's quite a serious claim to make.

What are you talking about?
Camilla didn't invite him anywhere. They were both at the same event prior to this 'piece' being written.

@raspberrytinsel

His female editor thought it passed muster because... maybe you know as an opinion writer it's ok to criticise the opposite sex. without being a deviant.

He didn't just 'criticise the opposite sex'.

He literally said he fantasises about a woman being publicly stripped naked and assaulted.

Do you not on a visceral level feel disgusted by what he said? No matter what your thoughts on H&M / free speech are?

Did you have the same reaction as many of us that it was a shocking, violent and disturbing thing to say?

Camilla was a guest, not the host of the event.

“The glitzy event at the Michelin-starred restaurant, owned by Angela Hartnett, was hosted by Ewan Venters, the former head of royal grocer Fortnum & Mason.”

Dame Judi Dench was also there. Dame Maggie Smith, too.

Suspect you already know this, though.

Millions around the world enjoyed watching an actress perform the naked walk of shame for them.

Public figure tells us he dreams of an actress doing the walk of shame and all hell breaks loose.

your sentence is full of contradictions in itself, because it is a historical analogy that was used, an implement of abuse not used for centuries. I'd liken it to saying he should be hung drawn and quartered.

why would she feel any different than you suggest?

All illegal today and for a good reason.

He is obviously a jackass, misogynist pig and I hope this ends his “writing” career.

And if you can’t see that it would be terrifying and threatening to have things like this written about you, you lack sense.

How did the Sun allow this to be published?I hope they have gone too far and it’s the beginning of the end for them. Very few people in Liverpool read it and I hope women will boycott it. Whatever your opinion of Meghan it’s absolutely disgusting and very unfunny.

@lollipoprainbow So first of all it was not a cosy lunch, that's your first false accusation. Next it was not Camilla's event so yet again that's another false accusation. Finally just because she attended an event where some one you don't like attended that make her guilty then that says more about you than her.

The more anti RF and Markle defenders post the more you realise they have zero facts to back up their claims and must get all their info from Twitter.

Didn't see the word fantasy/fantasise anywhere in the article? Be very very accurate.