Jeremy Clarkson

[kirinm]

Is a piece of shit. I refuse to link to his article in which he explicitly says he hates her and can't wait for the day he can physically assault her.

Can the Kate sycophants tell me again how this all happened to her and is totally normal and acceptable?

@Novella4 people who believe the ranting weirdo's on twitter are incredibly stupid!

well he did compare Harry to Basil Brush

yes called free speech @bloodyplanes

sorry now am waiting for the hate posts from @Novella4 I must have fallen asleep when they happened, I am sure the poster is compiling them efficiently right now.

well @Novella4 ????

@rasberry Am still waiting to hear the thoughts of JC on the male paedophile in the Royal Family. His raw emotion and what he'd like to do to him. His effect on JC's nocturnal habits.
You haven't got anything have you? Why is that?

😂Say waiting with my cup of warm Coco, might take a while....

Direct quote from JC about Andrew "“But he’s Andrew. He has the PR skills of a wasp and the intelligence of a ­dishwasher. I fear therefore he will make a hash of it.”

So are you saying JC defends him 🙄

so nah, nothing @Novella4 ? Handy for me? I'm only waiting on you.

Oh the irony of his Twitter bio

I haven't read his column, as I don't want to give him the clicks, but I'm aware of what he said via the newspapers and comments.

Such a distasteful airing of his misogyny and pervy sexual fantasies. Yuck.
Piece of shit.

It isn't really surprising that he feels able to air his repulsive attitudes, given the current attacks on women's sex based rights and continuing male violence against women. And that he is given a platform to do so by the media.

“Women have very little idea of how much men hate them” G. Greer.
And some women are in denial.

Because I am not Jeremy Clarkson, you'd have to ask him?😄, seriously? 🤣🤣🤣

@rumship You preserve your most stinging attacks on the criminal, on the child abuser. He didn't do that. Why is that? The woman keeps him awake? He hates her on a cellular level? Does he not hate child abusers on a cellular level?
The child abuser clearly doesn't have that effect on him as he has attacked and incited hate against the woman not the child abuser. It speaks for itself.

tweet him @wishingyouwell and you'll rest easy.

How do you know that? have you done a data trawl on all his tweets and all his personal opinion pieces.

Yet again you are proving just like the farckles that you are making claims without any due diligence or fact checking on what you are claiming.

@rumship I challenge you, quote the article if you have it. But you don't have it and nor will you ever find anything of the sort from a sexist and racist man.

He attacked the non-criminal woman and left alone the child abuser. Revolting.

I don't think people do hate her. Just dislike her and are annoyed by her lies.

And that justifies this article being published in the national press?!

I've just put in a complaint and I encourage others to do so too.

www.ipso.co.uk/complain/complaints-form/

You mean this article the very first I found when I googled JC and Andrew. I already quoted for you. I stopped after this as it's not my job to fact check all your apresions and false narrative claims.

www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/1557765/Jeremy-Clarkson-fears-prince-Andrew-interview-Epstein-Ghislaine-Maxwell-royal-fool-news

How about you produce some facts of your own, but you never do do you? It's all accusations, slurs , hearsay and waffle 😂

Haha I'm sure you just made JC quake in his boots. Is there another bandwagon for you to jump on 😂

you are projecting @wishingyouwell JC was obviously asked to write an opinion piece on Prince Harry and Megan Markle because they pay him to do exactly what they ask. That was his brief. If he wrote about other family members he would not get paid. Similarly, the title of this thread is about Jeremy Clarkson and despite multiple attempts at derailing it, that is what and who it is about. If something else bothers you massively start a new thread.

@rumship that article is an own goal for you. It does not prove any hate 'on a cellular level' and there are no thoughts of 'violent attack.' Bear in mind that the emotion he has towards a child abuser ought to be far heightened but it's nowhere near the admitted hatred he has for the woman is it?

Why is that? Why isn't the child abuser in the Royal Family keeping him awake? What should the paedophile's public punishment be if the non-criminal woman has to walk naked and have excrement thrown at her?
I'm waiting to read what violence he would like to happen to the child abuser but you can't find that article for me can you?

Carry on your search.

His female editor thought it passed muster because... maybe you know as an opinion writer it's ok to criticise the opposite sex. without being a deviant.

@jellyjellopeea thank you for sharing, will be doing the same.