@mrschocolatte
I am so glad my posts have struck a chord with you, thank you. I totally get the name thing as it has plagued so many friends and family members of mine. Had a banging argument with my husband about our child's name as I wanted a name meaningful in our language but that was also easy to pronounce given where we Iive. He said, "Fuck them, we should not pander to the ignorant. If they can learn Russian names they can learn ours."😂
@MarieIVanArkleStinks
Can you imagine the response if the Windsors were elected politicians? They'd be out on their arses before their feet could touch the ground.
You and @Roussette are absolutely spot
This is is what is so risible. This is a greatly privileged, influential family whose power rests on centuries old traditions but that steadfastly refuses to look inward on race. The fact that the monarch is STILL exempt from race discrimination laws, when we know that black people used to be confined to the kitchens, is baffling.
And don't get me started n the many photo opportunities we have seen of various members with cute black kids since the Oprah interview. It is highly cynical to use black faces as band aids when you are unwilling to do anything at all about the structural issues in the institution.
They once promised a "diversity tsar" nothing came of it. They even committed to improving the number of persons from minority backgrounds working for the various palaces. Nothing came of that either.
Meghan and Harry's interview should have been an opportunity for self-reflection by the RF. Instead they set their attack dogs in the media establishment on them.
Like you @Roussette I'm sorry to see the Earthshot award overshadowed by this, But for as long as the family refuses to have a real conversation about race, and the wider issues of colonialism and their role in it, not as individuals but as an institution, I predict that this sort of thing will haunt them, as the gimlet stare of the world is now on them. You can only use the black-toddler-band-aid a finite number of times!
@C8H10N4O2 Bet Lynch 😁 I am so enjoying your posts.
It is such a lazy cliche to assume leopard print must means Africa. We do have clothes, people. We don't wear animal skins on a daily basis. Even the one or three kingdoms that use leopard skins for ceremonial purposes, like the AmaZulu of South Africa, now get their fake leopard skins from ... wait for it ...
... China. Heh.
Which is good because there are not enough leopards in the wild, and have not been for a while and to make Ngozi's long dress would have taken at least four dead leopards, and that's four too many leopards, and, in any event, she is not of the AmaZulu. Just another Bet Lynch who digs the fabric!