I've always thought, also, that it's wisest for the Royal Family to stick with their core role of thanking volunteers who have served their communities. In that way, the selection of individuals and all of the research is done by experienced civil servants and careful preparation is made. The Royals are briefed on what they need to do, rather than being given 'creative directorship', as I would call it, of a stage play to show case worthy ( and cool credential) causes.
It isn't right, for me, that the 'companions' didn't know who the guests were and didn't have background information to prompt their small talk questions and to develop an aim for the meeting. But royals having favourite causes and pushing ahead with championing them does risk the integrity of the degree of preparation which can be managed. And this event at the beginning of King Charles' reign, and when Camilla is getting used to the ropes as the top female Royal with full hosting responsibilities.
The failings does highlight how the Queen was a consummate professional in the way she herself performed her role, but then she didn't overstretch the role by making it diverge into championing individual causes.
This might have been a reception, but with such a serious and important good cause at its heart, it is going to have a serious theme and tone. It isn't quite the occasion for, doddery 'ladies in waiting' ( as companions used to be called) going around inventing their own line of questioning. Care and prepared questions would have been better.
Ngozi Fulani has highlighted an important area of DV: that black families fear reporting a black male member, in case he experienced police brutality. Whether or not things have improved since the times that Ms Fulani harks back to in her addresses, it is a valid point, that black women may fear this, and it will make them vulnerable. Some people may never have thought of this angle, without her campaigning. ( I wouldn't have done).I would like and do feel confident that policing is more enlightened in 2022.
This isn't really an event for excusing a dodderer, and with Ms Fulani's negative life experiences and impressions, which she has turned all to something positive, to help others, I wouldn't expect her to be ready to laugh and thinks she is like an audience member at a live comedy show, who gets roped in to be bantered and harangued by the comedian on stage, in the name of good fun. It might look like a history set piece, this event, in a unique setting, but the cause itself is too important for humour and humouring.