Public members rude to meghan

[RheanaT]

I've seen a clip on Instagram where a group of women completely blanked MM when she spoke to them. It was awful to watch.
I feel so sorry for her, she didn't deserve that at all.
I saw another clip where someone had asked her for a hug, she obliged and when they hugged she really held the member of public and closed her eyes, it looked as if she really needed that hug .
No wonder she ran away from the UK

Once again - they are not with Sunshine Sachs any more

And there it is….

Please show where I said "scroll on by"???
You're making stuff up again

As there appears to be posters saying MM is no different to SM I was illustrating the difference. Rather glaring do t you think?

In other words, you don't want the things that Sam said to be proven, so you can carry on with your fantasy that she is innocent.

@Roussette

you told posters on another earlier thread that if they didn’t like something they could scroll on by, and ignore it. You also said you’re unable to do the same with the RF as it’s taxpayers money but clearly SM falls outside this taxpayer funding issue

The search button is shit and you post far too much for me to find the exact post for you.

When you say linking this stuff....maybe read the content of the article and leave the tweets? Perfectly possible

@notanotheroneagain

ive never said she’s innocent, how have you managed to twist my words to that 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I’ve said SM is full of shit and I’d rather not read it, I don’t need to read it.

How many years ago was my supposed 'scroll on by' comment?

All you saying I can only comment on the royal family because they are taxpayer funded but I cannot comment on the trolling by her half sister?
Bizarre

Because I didn't say it?

A few months rightio

Form lol

I think you were waxing lyrical about people hating those they don’t know and that they should just not read or watch stuff about those people

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Can you also explain why I am only allowed to comment on the taxpayer funded royal family but no one else?

Ahhh I know exactly !

I said there's a couple of celebs/famous people I dont particularly like. Because I am not keen on them I avoid going on threads specially about them. I swerve them.
I have never used the words scroll on by for your info.
All very normal.

Can I join you in a row of 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I’m only on mumset a few months so not that long ago.

Really !😂😂

I seem to be very well known to someone who has only been here a few months! I'm famous!

😉

@Roussette

i think a scroll on by paraphrase was perfectly reasonable 🤣 so let’s move on

famous or infamous @Roussette 🤣🤣 only a joke - I do enjoy your contributions

as I said, SM is nuts, but there are pockets of very sad people who thrive on hat

@notanotheroneagain I’ve used SM to mean Samantha Markle in my posts but realise they may have read as social media SM and in that case you wouldn’t have realised i was condemning Samantha’s words in the strongest possible fashion

She trashes the British monarchy at every turn. It’s hardly surprising that people turning out for the queen’s funeral are not her biggest fans.

Is Meghan not at least equally motivated by money as Samantha and Thomas?

Is the Prince/princess Archie/Lilibet title debacle not about the monetarisation of her dc?

It's about the safety of her dc

Well yes, we all know Meghan said that, but anyone with any actual knowledge of the situation will know that in fact a title is completely irrelevant to whether or not her and Harry’s children are eligible for taxpayer-paid security.

Any other reason?

It's not about their safety though as they have private security either way

Just leave her be. So sick of all the hate. This is not what her Majesty would have wanted for her family.

Some people won’t be happy until either Meghan or Harry are pushed over the edge. It’s just so nasty.

I'm not sure her majesty approved of the conduct of M&H

@Ohnonevermind
Fair enough 👍