Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Public members rude to meghan

1000 replies

RheanaT · 12/09/2022 12:16

I've seen a clip on Instagram where a group of women completely blanked MM when she spoke to them. It was awful to watch.
I feel so sorry for her, she didn't deserve that at all.
I saw another clip where someone had asked her for a hug, she obliged and when they hugged she really held the member of public and closed her eyes, it looked as if she really needed that hug .
No wonder she ran away from the UK

OP posts:
Ohnonevermind · 18/09/2022 09:43

@notanotheroneagain

no, but remember the adage about ‘wrestling a pig’ - you both get dirty and the pig like it

i think it holds true in this case.

Samantha has headed into the crazy corner of the internet. She’ll just burn herself out and no-one respectable journalist will want to speak to her again. Meghan just needs some patience

Ohnonevermind · 18/09/2022 09:46

@notanotheroneagain

i’m sure what she said about Samantha is true, but that’s not the point

The outcome for MM was

  1. it came out that she collaborated with Scobe
  2. she lied to the court about collaborating and had to apologise to the court
  3. she dragged herself down to their level

i’m sure it wasn’t worth it for her in hindsight

Roussette · 18/09/2022 09:51

Samantha has been doing it for years though and no burn out yet
She was on the ghastly GBnews just days ago with Thomas.

derxa · 18/09/2022 09:55

Roussette · 18/09/2022 09:51

Samantha has been doing it for years though and no burn out yet
She was on the ghastly GBnews just days ago with Thomas.

Gosh that's dedication keeping track of her movements. I've not seen hunt nor hair of her for a long time. It's best to ignore her surely

Snog · 18/09/2022 09:59

Just pointing out Rousette that if you are fine saying unpleasant stuff about the Markles who I can only assume you don't personally know you aren't exactly living in an ivory tower.
More of a greenhouse really.

Roussette · 18/09/2022 10:08

Snog · 18/09/2022 09:59

Just pointing out Rousette that if you are fine saying unpleasant stuff about the Markles who I can only assume you don't personally know you aren't exactly living in an ivory tower.
More of a greenhouse really.

I know you have already pointed it out. Twice

I'm sure you'd love a sister who was going round any news outlet saying you didn't have your children but by surrogacy and insist you should be having 'a womb test'

Of course I don't know them but I can hear and read what comes out of their mouths. (See above). Not gossip. Not guesswork. Fact.

This isn't about me, much as you are trying so hard to weave in a criticism of me into this narrative.

Unclear on ivory towers and greenhouses lol

Ohnonevermind · 18/09/2022 10:10

Does anyone watch gb news @Roussette - why would you bother. Far better for your blood pressure to ignore, I wouldn’t even know where to find the station

SarahShorty · 18/09/2022 10:11

Perhaps she shouldn't have slagged off the family she married into, then. When she claimed to have given up her career and livelihood to be with Harry in THAT Opera interview, I laughed. The woman is ridiculous.

Roussette · 18/09/2022 10:12

Ohnonevermind · 18/09/2022 10:10

Does anyone watch gb news @Roussette - why would you bother. Far better for your blood pressure to ignore, I wouldn’t even know where to find the station

I don't watch it. It is possible to hear what's been said without watching it. They've been on Good Morning Britain too.

notanotheroneagain · 18/09/2022 10:18

Ohnonevermind · 18/09/2022 09:43

@notanotheroneagain

no, but remember the adage about ‘wrestling a pig’ - you both get dirty and the pig like it

i think it holds true in this case.

Samantha has headed into the crazy corner of the internet. She’ll just burn herself out and no-one respectable journalist will want to speak to her again. Meghan just needs some patience

How long is your deadline for H&M to sit on their hands, while others seems to succeed in convincing everyone how evil they are ? I mean, they have spent all this time from 2016, just letting these smears go on. Now you have people like youself who are convinced they are villains.
At some point, they have to come back, as they have work to do.

What I'm seeing here is people saying, let the smears carry on. Do not correct anything etc. This is the hindrance to their work. And it's not abating, as pointed out, the Markles are still smearing up to today. Unlike others like Andrew, W, C and spouses etc. they don't have a big machinery protecting them - even worse, it looks like that same massive machinery was not just not protecting them, it was in fact behind the smears.

If H&M were left alone when they moved after that January Sandringham summit, they probably would have just left all those lies about them go. But they were still being hounded across the pond after. Whenever they were doing a zoom call or charity or any event, bits and pieces were spliced up and criticised and twisted. Smear after smear.

People coming on here and say, but we liked them before the interview. So now we have to pretend that 2016-2019 never happened. The OW interview was not a catalyst for anything, it was a result.

Ohnonevermind · 18/09/2022 10:19

You’re giving them a voice on this thread, there are many crazy people out there on both sides.

notanotheroneagain · 18/09/2022 10:22

Ohnonevermind · 18/09/2022 10:10

Does anyone watch gb news @Roussette - why would you bother. Far better for your blood pressure to ignore, I wouldn’t even know where to find the station

Looks like most of the posters on here do though. They tend to quote what has been said there and tabloids .

I do come across GB'news' and rag info on SM, who doesn't . But I never quite believe it, especially when it's in regards with H&M.

Ohnonevermind · 18/09/2022 10:25

@notanotheroneagain

your post is pure fantasy, are you

They’ve been sitting on their hands - they’ve been in and out of court - hardly sitting on their hands

‘they don’t have big machinery protecting them’ - sunshine Sachs is one of the biggest PR agencies in the business

The OW interview peddled a victim narrative to set up their US launch, but most people saw through it.

Snog · 18/09/2022 10:28

Rousette "This isn't about me, much as you are trying so hard to weave in a criticism of me into this narrative."

And
"No point in answering you in detail as I know what you think about her whatever anyone says."

Oh yes of course you do. Are you my husband?
Are you not actively weaving your own criticism of me?

Puzzledandpissedoff · 18/09/2022 10:29

If was disappointing that Meghan funnelled her comments back to Omid via Jason for his book about Samantha’s education failures and losing custody her kids
I thought it lost MM the moral high ground in her dealings with her family and made her look as petty as them

Very much agree with this, Ohnonevermind. I don't imagine that anyone with sense trusts what the ghastly Samantha's got to say, but entering a game of tit for tat gave more oxygen to her comments and possibly even goaded her into producing more for the trash media to seize on

Much better, surely, to just treat her with the contempt she's earned

Ohnonevermind · 18/09/2022 10:29

@notanotheroneagain

i do a lot of proactive hiding feeds on Facebook, and the algorithms do the rest.

My IG is really boring, some friends and house renovation feeds. I highly recommend cheap houses US and EU I’m always amazed at the amazing woodwork on houses for 20,.000 dollars in Nebraska etc - far better for the blood pressure than reading the Markles

BlueRidge · 18/09/2022 10:45

Samantha Markle comes across as quite an unpleasant individual, as well as unhinged.
But that doesn't necessarily mean she is wrong about everything she says. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

Coronateachingagain · 18/09/2022 10:47

BlueRidge · 18/09/2022 10:45

Samantha Markle comes across as quite an unpleasant individual, as well as unhinged.
But that doesn't necessarily mean she is wrong about everything she says. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

Unpleasant and unhinged traits run in the family unfortunately

Ohnonevermind · 18/09/2022 10:55

For me, talking about wombs etc is just nasty, even if she got some reproductive assistance, I don’t care. It’s none of our business.

Some people just love conspiracies and the internet has given these nutters a platform to spout this stuff. If it’s any consolation I do think some people accused kate of the same thing .

Roussette · 18/09/2022 11:04

I dont think Kate was a caused of this for years and incessantly.

Just a sample of Meghan's half sister. Look at her tweets within the article. Vile

www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/meghan-markles-biggest-troll-is-her-half-sister-samantha

skullbabe · 18/09/2022 11:09

SarahShorty · 18/09/2022 10:11

Perhaps she shouldn't have slagged off the family she married into, then. When she claimed to have given up her career and livelihood to be with Harry in THAT Opera interview, I laughed. The woman is ridiculous.

I’m not sure why this would amuse or upset you. She did have a career (whatever you may think of it) and made her own money (obv not as much as in the royal family but certainly very comfortable). She had to give it up - Sophie showed how difficult is was to continue working and being in the Royal Family - this would be even worse for an actor.

Ohnonevermind · 18/09/2022 11:10

@Roussette

why would I want to read it, on a beautiful sunny Sunday morning. Why are you linking this stuff.

Ohnonevermind · 18/09/2022 11:12

@Roussette

you yourself told people to scroll on by, yet here you ware linking to articles filled with hate in your own words.

id suggest kindly you take your own advice

skullbabe · 18/09/2022 11:15

ittakes2 · 18/09/2022 09:24

No one says they want to leave the public eye and then does an Oprah Winfrey show to take a pop at their family. Unfort at the end of the day its this that H&M can't come back from. The flowers, the hand-holding - all irrelevant - people mae a judgement call and took sides after the Oprah Winfrey show.

They wanted to be away from the constant negative press - that’s all.

skullbabe · 18/09/2022 11:20

Snog · 18/09/2022 08:25

Rousette "When asked why she cashes in on Meghan's fame she says 'Why not? Life is about money'
Ditto her father."

And is Meghan different in her life philosophy?

From what is in the public domain - yes, Meghan is different in her life philosophy

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.