Aspiring matriarch
As I suggested, up thread, it's perfectly possible that flowers have to checked by security. Why wouldn't they be checked? Sabotage could range from a single foolish person putting shards of glass in the stalks, to something more toxic or even orchestrated terrorism. Why! It's been on the cards for some time that the Queen might pass, and state mourning follows a proscribed and easy to predict pattern. An obvious opportunity for sabotage.
This is the sort of occasion when there is a need to appear human and not like at Di's funeral, so it might lead some Royals to become spontaneous, and for protocol to be pushed to one side. Also, lots or royals are going to be physically close together. This sort of circumstance triggers some people. Sometimes unbalanced people do use a big occasion to do something that gets noticed: didn't a man run in front of King Charles' car to get a photo?
If you objectively recognise that you are someone who thinks the Royal Family is like the Kardashian clan, and you acknowledge that for you there isn't a constitutional angle, then, fair enough, talk and write about K and M as if they are Khloe and Kourtney ....and discuss who people think is prettier and more like a true Disney princess. But at least TRY to recognise that there might be another more serious lens through which you can look at the workings of the Royal Family and that posters who don't agree with you are not necessarily guided by personal malice. They might be thinking ' We pay taxes to keep this country working smoothly - we don't want trouble making egotists to undermine the edifice on which out country's systems and government is positioned.
Set aside the constitutional issue of undermining the RF, even on a personal level, is there a family on earth who could weather having one of their senior members implied to be a racist? It's like saying someone is a paedophile. It's very serious. And then not to say who actually it is, meaning that that person cannot come back with an explanation, is just knowingly doing damage to the institution. Is it surprising that some people are going to be aghast and disapproving.
Also, what was all that ' the silence is part of the song' and 'I am silent until I speak '??? It's a threat isn't it, like you get in Agatha Christie books when the manipulator says: ' I could have seen or heard something, if I'd been looking'. It's all like: ' I could say something if I wanted to' .
. There's absolutely loads of reasons to disapprove of H and M . There behaviour has been unprecedented in British history. Never before have lesser royals taken on and contradicted the monarch in a thousand years.
If you think, yeah, M and H have got a right to call out behaviour which would shock the world, then don't take the stance that this thread could be people over -reacting to a bunch of flowers, because, it would have to be acknowledged that the issues between H and the rest of his family are more profound .