So someone reads a book on Princess Diana, blogs about Kate Middleton, but doesn't know about Prince Harry? That stretches credibility. Previous friends of hers have described it as a lie.
She did not say she does not know his existence. Her exact words were "I didn't know much about him." A difference. She was saying this to a friend of Harry's, who personally knew him. I have never seen the blog about about Kate, I assume it would have been a standard one about fashion or something if it was in the Tig. Do you have links of her blogging a lot about KM?
She claimed to be unable to travel. Factually incorrect. She took numerous flights.
She was talking about being denied to meet a friend for lunch. She was told she was everywhere, when she had not left the house in ages. She said, they take away your keys, passport etc. when you join. I imagine, for a jetsetter like her as she demonstrated on her blog, she is used to travelling all over the place as she pleases. In the three yrs, the only personal travels we know of are the tennis with Serena (one in the UK, and one the US), the baby shower, the holiday at Elton John house. I cannot think of much more, can you. Considering you know about the Tig, you would know she travelled way more than this and did a lot of engagements before the RF. Even if she was not a traveller, there is very few times of her doing her own thing for 3yrs. She is not a 100yr old homebody ffs.
They claimed not to have cooperated on Finding Freedom and were proven to have done so in court. Maintained their distance, but very clearly provided material.
The judges must have been miffed to find the DM asked for a hearing based on this, hence this issue did not even register in their decision. If FF authors had asked JK to answer questions about KM making MM cry, and W&K said, no the brief to everyone is that there was no crying, this would be considered as W&K as co-operating because JK is representing them. It would also be the case if they said the same to the DM. They are cooperating. It's neither here or there, that is why the judges dismissed it.
Thomas Markle not only bankrolled her college tuition, but her expensive trips to Europe. Her blog had spoken of him regularly taking her out to expensive restaurants while she was a student, as well as funding time abroad. Clearly, the image she wanted to prevent of deprivation and "never having had a family" was false.
I am still waiting for your receipts that TM paid the tuition fees. Her family is her, Doria and a father who is divorced. She does not have lots of cousins and grandmother all as a family unit like Harry, so yes, her family is totally different from his.
Some of the photos of her cycling with his mother and father don't appear to be PR. Impossible to prove, but certainly makes his claims dubious.
The photos of the bikes were clearly staged. W&H were pointing at the cameras and looking at them at some point. Even worse the ones with Diana, they stopped the bikes to make a proper pose.
Some of this is trivial but it's evidence of two people who twist the truth to craft a narrative
If you are going to be trivial, be accurate. The only people creating a narrative are the papers and those against the Sussexes.
And regarding the racism discussion, let's not forget that currently the only royal of his generation to be proven (and forced to apologise) for racist abuse is Harry himself. Forced into an apology for calling one person "a little Paki" and saying that another looked "like a raghead". Then has the gall to libel his own family as racist!
He is not the only one actually. It has been proven a family trait from PP. He was wearing a costume, same as William was wearing an African costume and saying "don't worry, we won't be eating crocodiles or anything ".