Harry to sue UK governmdnt

[Viviennemary]

This is according to the DM. Over the withdrawal of his security funding.

@user528849290

Of course the racism denier is an Andrew apologist lol

Why are you twisting my words, where have I denied racism or apologised for Andrew.

I hate what Mumsnet has become, it's not a place to discuss anything anymore, so many sock puppets and name changing militants calling people whatever they feel like and reporting is fucking useless because no one seems to see the patterns.

Fuck this shit!!

@2YearsOfWastedTime

Turning everything into a racist issue?

Someone asked how dark the baby will be… Is that not racist enough for you ? @amusedtodeath1

And it has nothing to do with Prince Phillip being ill

That's what they say and many black people or partners of black people have said they also discussed the colour of their unborn babys skin amongst family. Do you want to go and tell them their racist too.

It has everything to do with Prince Philip, what sort of low life pours hatred on their family on TV when their grandad is dying?

That's what opened my eyes to them not being as kind and caring as they pretend to be.

I

@nottodaybatman

Frankly if you enjoy hating all things sussex crack on. However know that this little story was deliberately put out there to protect a sex offender.

The comms and PR people employed by the RF sat down and agreed this strategy. They coordinated with the Mail and leaked this information to give cover for Andrew who likes hanging out with groomers and pedophiles when not living in his highly subsidised housing.

And best of all, we are definitely paying for this PR strategy as tax payers, along with Andrew's legal defence etc.

I find the grubbiness of this whole spiel by the RF really insulting to our collective intelligence

I agree we are paying for this PR strategy. There will be many more articles criticising Harry and Meghan. Few will be true. But the Royal Family won't care, as long as people are not talking about Andrew.

His US detail will have been refused in the UK as they will want to be armed whilst here, and that's what he wants. He could bring who the hell he wanted from the US to follow him down Oxford St without a firearm, but obviously our laws don't allow it with a firearm, unless you're licensed.

He wants to "hire" UK Police to protect him as the Royal Protection Officers are all highly trained, licensed firearm officers and are routinely armed.

Sorry Harry, legal gunmen aren't for hire in the UK, it's one of the good things about us. And that's his issue.

@amusedtodeath1 You are being played to distract from Andrew.

It's embarrassing but Andrew is useful because it makes the media spin so transparent and ridiculous

Poor Q is embarrassed that Andrew hung out with child abusers and might be one too. What about the actual victims?!

Harry calling out the racism of the British media is an insult to the Q is the greatest sleight of hand I have ever seen. What about the actual racism being retreated and written about by actual royal reporter? What about all of us having to see this shit pushed at us for years on end?

Frankly if you enjoy hating all things sussex crack on. However know that this little story was deliberately put out there to protect a sex offender.

Exactly how is putting this story out protecting or covering up for PA? It's a bit stable and horse. Very odd.

The issue isn't that he isn't allowed to pay for his own protection in the UK but that he wants his private security team to carry guns ( cf. have "adequate resources abroad") and have access to UK intelligence sources; like giving Harry's Private SWAT team open access to the UK's security network isn't a potentially massive security risk for everyone else in the country! Does he make the same request to every place he goes on his numerous holidays? Thought not.
And as to his justification that other people who'veshaftedserved the country get paid protection (assume he's thinking of ex-PMs), he walked away from hispretendjob and stuck two fingers up as he went. Don't see that entitles him to anything; no one voted for him.
I'd think he was being offered a seat back on the royal gravy train to deflect attention from his uncle, except for the fact that the proceedings were isued in September. At this rate, H&M risk being labelled vexatious and contumelious litigants for clogging up the courts, and banned

Re tweeted

Poor Prince Harry sounds like a refugee. If it isn’t safe to return to his home country he will sadly won’t be able to come unless his Dad organises something.

For goodness sake

We arent talking about black people talking about the colour of the babies skin

We are talking about the royal family being worried that the baby will be ‘to dark’ for there likely

I need to get a grip @amusedtodeath1

• There liking !

This story is now on the front page of the mail, there are articles in the independent and BBC and sky

This story has pushed Andrew off the front page in time for the Sunday broadsheets just when the story of his medals and patronages should be being dissected on those same front pages.

What a coincidence that there is this brand new fresh news of the wickedness of Harry (and probably meghan too)?!

RF comms strategy at work

I'm not a H&M fan as a result of how they chose to exit the RF and their ridiculous manifesto (plus the bloody silly OW interview, Delaware registration etc)

That said, I don't think he's being unreasonable here.

He's willing to pay for the security and he is undoubtedly a "target".

Protect him (at his expense) or does anyone think that if something awful happened to him or his family would reflect well on the U.K., RF or The Met?

Indeed he is and his family and all the advisors still want to protect this sex offender.

Such interesting priorities for our global brand ambassadors. Such integrity, they never put a foot wrong, such a hard working bunch

@dopenguinsdance

The issue isn't that he isn't allowed to pay for his own protection in the UK but that he wants his private security team to carry guns ( cf. have "adequate resources abroad") and have access to UK intelligence sources; like giving Harry's Private SWAT team open access to the UK's security network isn't a potentially massive security risk for everyone else in the country! Does he make the same request to every place he goes on his numerous holidays? Thought not. And as to his justification that other people who'veshaftedserved the country get paid protection (assume he's thinking of ex-PMs), he walked away from hispretendjob and stuck two fingers up as he went. Don't see that entitles him to anything; no one voted for him. I'd think he was being offered a seat back on the royal gravy train to deflect attention from his uncle, except for the fact that the proceedings were isued in September. At this rate, H&M risk being labelled vexatious and contumelious litigants for clogging up the courts, and banned

Ahh....ok.

I'll stand corrected and do a bit more research....

@AllThePogs

This isn't the genius insight that you seem think it is. No one has forgotten about Andrew. Harry and Meghan had been largely forgotten about and were rapidly fading from public consciousness, until they decided to return to this country with more entitlement and demands.

@dontsaythj but the judicial review is an old story. The request happened months ago. So why do you think it is only now on the front of all the Sunday newspapers?

I don't think this is a RF comms strategy. Andrew has his own comms team which he uses regardless of advice from the RF. Hence why there was the horrendous 'I can't sweat' interview.

Andrew being demoted is a good news story for the RF. It shows they have acted even before any court judgement. This turns that good news story into a negative one about Harry and a negative one about the RF (as you can see from all the posters blaming this on the RF).

I expect Andrew will be trying to burn lots of boats in petulance at being demoted.

This isn't the genius insight that you seem think it is. No one has forgotten about Andrew. Harry and Meghan had been largely forgotten about and were rapidly fading from public consciousness, until they decided to return to this country with more entitlement and demands.

Maybe that's it, Uncle Andrew has been hogging the spotlight for too long

Many people across the globe can’t return to their home country through no fault of their own, Harry isn’t a special case. It doesn’t seem like his Dad, brother or indeed Granny are particularly keen on seeing him anyway.

[quote AllThePogs]@amusedtodeath1 You are being played to distract from Andrew.[/quote]
I can comfortably deal with more than one story at a time about the Royal Family, thanks.

This all happened months ago. So why is it only now in the newspapers as if has only just happened?