Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Thread about Harry and Meghan that has no deletions

999 replies

OverUnderSidewaysDown · 09/08/2020 19:41

Play nicely and don’t say anything that will get your post (or the thread) deleted. I’ll start. Archie is cute and it would be lovely to see him more often.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Noidea2114 · 05/09/2020 09:26

H and M are very disrespectful to HMQ. I surprised that H can't see the hurt they are causing to the RF.
The sooner they have the titles removed and any money from PC stopped the better.
On another forum the number of people cancelling Netflix. They don't want to watch anything these fools are trying to ram down
our throats.

SunbathingDragon · 05/09/2020 10:02

@Noidea2114

H and M are very disrespectful to HMQ. I surprised that H can't see the hurt they are causing to the RF. The sooner they have the titles removed and any money from PC stopped the better. On another forum the number of people cancelling Netflix. They don't want to watch anything these fools are trying to ram down our throats.
I’m sure supporters will sign up to Netflix to see what they produce. I would also imagine what the produce will look good because Netflix will spend the money on the right people to ensure it does. If the part H&M play in the production isn’t well received, it will just be reduced and/or they will be replaced and the show will either continue without their input or in a different way with completely different people.
Viviennemary · 05/09/2020 10:14

Grin good spelling mistake in this case.

thecatsthecats · 05/09/2020 10:29

Given cancel culture is rife, I'm extremely surprised that Harry's racism hasn't been brought under the spotlight in the US yet. It's well documented and repeated - not something someone would have to trawl through Twitter for.

I also don't think £75m is the amount it seems to mere mortals. That will include substantial production costs and salaries for someone to do the actual work.

Actors are usually given production credits EITHER as a tribute to their star power, or because they show long term connection to the role/talent enough to take a role on production.

But part of the cachet is having that sort of money to bandy about on known names. Hands up if you'd heard of Tyler Perry before this? Or if you'd bat an eyelid at him being given £75m to produce content?

The £75m is a payment that comes with a lot of strings attached - to pay for the creation of the work, and more critically, to perpetually self promote yourself to be worthy of the price tag.

I actually used to employ a woman who was a minor celebrity in the late nineties. She made a huge amount of money, but they both encourage and require you to spend it in ways that don't encourage long term prosperity - it's all part of the image and lifestyle they sell. Which is why she ended up cleaning hotels before working for us.

(incidentally, I ended up firing her for racism)

hopeishere · 05/09/2020 14:37

I agree about the racism stuff - dreaming as a Nazi and I believe he called someone a paki once too.

Didn't the Obamas sign a massive deal with Netflix too? What output have they had / broadcast??

Tinyleaf · 05/09/2020 16:51

Why is this thread so named as there's loads of deletions?

jessstan2 · 05/09/2020 16:53

Sunbathing Dragon: H and M are very disrespectful to HMQ. I surprised that H can't see the hurt they are causing to the RF.
........
How?

ajandjjmum · 05/09/2020 17:02

@Tinyleaf

Why is this thread so named as there's loads of deletions?
The OP began the thread in a spirit of optimism........
ajandjjmum · 05/09/2020 17:04

@jessstan2

Sunbathing Dragon: H and M are very disrespectful to HMQ. I surprised that H can't see the hurt they are causing to the RF. ........ How?
Anyone with even the lowest level of empathy would see that leaving your family and work commitments without a backward glance, and then slating members of that same family who you have previously held in high regard, is hurtful,
lifestooshort123 · 05/09/2020 18:08

Tinyleaf

Why is this thread so named as there's loads of deletions?

Because the other H&M threads became nasty cesspits of sewerage where posters were slagged off and disrespected and many posts were deleted. This one was brought into being for us to play nicey-nicey but the Mods take exception to anything that might be seen as a tad aggressive to H&M (or anything that mentions the other site) and delete with gusto. It is what it is!

SunbathingDragon · 05/09/2020 18:48

@jessstan2

Sunbathing Dragon: H and M are very disrespectful to HMQ. I surprised that H can't see the hurt they are causing to the RF. ........ How?
I replied to the quote stating that; I did not write it.

So maybe ask the person who wrote it how, not me.

ZaraCarmichaelshighheels · 05/09/2020 20:04

Apparently they are trademarking Travelyst so they can lobby governments, I actually find it quite concerning the amount of power the royal family actually have, I’m not just complaining about H & M here, Charles is guilty of this too with his handwritten letters, they really aren’t just figureheads at all, the power, money and influence they have just because of their accident of birth or because of marriage feels more wrong than ever.

Flube · 05/09/2020 20:09

I replied to the quote stating that; I did not write it.

So maybe ask the person who wrote it how, not me.

I had the same thing on another thread here, when replying to someone else's quote about the other place. Confused

It's clearly not just critical thinking that is lacking, blinded by their own frothing. Ironic really. As is this thread. No deletions, pah!

For those that are lacking in critical thinking; HaM have been massively disrespectful, anyone with half a brain can see why. They've shown it time and time again. H should bloody know better.

Also a lot of 'lies' from the media, have been backed up with the release of FF. Plus the things Scobie has been spouting since appears to solidify it.

HaM have been quick to issue opposing statements, and in some cases sue, over a lot less.

Oldbutstillgotit · 05/09/2020 20:33

Has anyone mentioned that MM is suing a photo agency for taking photos of her in Canada walking her dogs with Archie in his carrier ?

Myimaginarycathadfleas · 05/09/2020 21:06

@ZaraCarmichaelshighheels

Apparently they are trademarking Travelyst so they can lobby governments, I actually find it quite concerning the amount of power the royal family actually have, I’m not just complaining about H & M here, Charles is guilty of this too with his handwritten letters, they really aren’t just figureheads at all, the power, money and influence they have just because of their accident of birth or because of marriage feels more wrong than ever.
I don't know that they do have any real power. For all PC's sending out his Black Spider letters, his influence has been limited. The same will be true of the Sussexes. They will make a bit of noise, some people will applaud politely, that will be it really.
derxa · 05/09/2020 21:11

@Oldbutstillgotit

Has anyone mentioned that MM is suing a photo agency for taking photos of her in Canada walking her dogs with Archie in his carrier ?
Absolutely ridiculous
SunbathingDragon · 05/09/2020 21:17

@Oldbutstillgotit

Has anyone mentioned that MM is suing a photo agency for taking photos of her in Canada walking her dogs with Archie in his carrier ?
If you are talking about the photos of MM smiling at the camera, with her security guards walking behind her (and not preventing the pictures from being taken), and Archie’s face not being visible as he was facing her in a carrier then yes. I wonder if she was unhappy about the level of criticism she received about incorrectly using the baby carrier as a result of the pictures being published.

Now it has been stated that she has called the paps in the past, I do wonder what impact that will have on her trying to sue at a time they weren’t called.

LittleBearPad · 05/09/2020 21:25

Those photos were published months ago. If she was unhappy then she should have got a love on sooner.

Or do you think it’s an attempt to try to prove to Harry she didn’t set them up...

LittleBearPad · 05/09/2020 21:26

*move on

SunbathingDragon · 05/09/2020 21:49

Lots of expensive legal bills.

Oldbutstillgotit · 05/09/2020 21:59

I have to say this action puzzles me . Why leave it so long ? I thought they were charming photos and you couldn’t really see Archie so what was the issue ?

Neverendingcourgettes · 06/09/2020 09:01

You don’t need the share token (haven’t got one anyway) to get the gist of this.

Invictus has an annual income of less than £1m a year and has previously relied on private donations.

www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/harry-and-meghans-netflix-deal-scuppers-invictus-bash-38kt5k6sc

SunbathingDragon · 06/09/2020 10:01

[quote Neverendingcourgettes]You don’t need the share token (haven’t got one anyway) to get the gist of this.

Invictus has an annual income of less than £1m a year and has previously relied on private donations.

www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/harry-and-meghans-netflix-deal-scuppers-invictus-bash-38kt5k6sc[/quote]
That’s very disappointing if true.

Oldbutstillgotit · 06/09/2020 10:11

I have only read the bit that is available without signing up but I am not understanding why it has to be cancelled because of Netflix ?
If H is stepping back from Invictus it would be hugely disappointing as he did so much to support the organisation.