Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Harry and Meghan news

999 replies

callmeadoctor · 08/06/2020 09:29

www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1292590/meghan-markle-prince-harry-la-career-plans-latest-royal-news

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
thisenglishlife · 11/06/2020 13:08

supporting something currently in the public eye. Meghan clearly has supported against racism in the past
So she can then?
It’s when they preach about the environment Meghan hasn't, Harry has (along with Charles and William) - all have taken private jets.

SunbathingDragon · 11/06/2020 13:28

@thisenglishlife

supporting something currently in the public eye. Meghan clearly has supported against racism in the past So she can then? It’s when they preach about the environment Meghan hasn't, Harry has (along with Charles and William) - all have taken private jets.
And she clearly does!

Meghan has and as an example her shared official Instagram account with Harry chose to focus on it (in July 2019 it was their social issue of the month). That’s just to name one. Considering how easy the internet is to get such information it’s just lazy to not bother to research before incorrectly stating something as fact. It also does nothing for credibility for anything else you post.

thisenglishlife · 11/06/2020 13:51

So I missed one thing (I don't follow royals on Instagram), it still doesn't change that all the royals have used private jets... Just like pretty much any famous face. However, Charles, William and Harry have all had environmental initiatives.

thisenglishlife · 11/06/2020 13:52

A shared account could have meant that Harry decided on the focus.

Froq · 11/06/2020 13:57

www.instagram.com/tv/CBRew5rHE5y/?utm_source=ig_embed&ig_mid=5158E8C2-BDC5-4A3C-8875-98141580BBEB

This is interesting. I wonder if M will distance herself from Jessica M now?

ARoseInHarlem · 11/06/2020 14:50

I feel that H&M have been hoisted by their own petard.

From the get-go they’ve been open about thoughts and feelings: statements to the press, counter-briefings, official announcements, Instagram statements, more Instagram statements, TV interview, maybe now a book, he said-she said tittle tattle in the tabloids. It all speaks to a desire (or need?) to speak or be heard and then, obviously, a desire to control that narrative and defend yourself if it doesn’t go sympathetically.

How much better their life could have been if they’d just kept schtum. I’m not saying they should have, they’re free to do whatever they want. I’m saying that they themselves wouldn’t have had to deal with so much backlash if they hadn’t put so much fodder out there to begin with. If they’d quietly given up their RF roles, as they have, and moved to LA, as they have, the story would have been “he loves her so much he’s given everything up for her - Harry Finds True Love at Last”. Sure there would have been raised eyebrows and cries of his selfishness (putting a woman before duty etc), and the racist bilge would have been there anyway because racist people exist anyway. But it could have been less messy and noisy than this.

For the avoidance of doubt, in my book they’ve been 100% right being vocal about the racist abuse MM has received. Actually, not vocal enough in my book but it’s not my life. I just feel they could have avoided a lot of the noise, because nothing they’ve done has come close to what Andrew has gotten away with and yet he’s slinking off into an early retirement without half as much attention.

Roussette · 11/06/2020 14:55

Agree with lots of your post Rose

Andrew has gotten away with and yet he’s slinking off into an early retirement without half as much attention

And with his three Protection officers at £300K p.a.

TheNavigator · 11/06/2020 14:56

Whatever they had done they could have been criticised and they would always get more attention than Andrew because they are more glamourous than a sleazy old man. They can't win with some people, there is no pleasing everybody.

Goldengroveunleaving · 11/06/2020 15:09

they would always get more attention than Andrew because they are more glamourous than a sleazy old man

Very hard to see how this would bring them negative attention! They had no problem doing that for themselves.

Here's how to be a low-key royal:
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/humber/3503318.stm#:~:text=Pupils%20at%20a%20Hull%20primary,boost%20the%20school's%20arts%20teaching.

(OK, so she wasn't instantly recognisable, but still quite an appealing example.)

TheNavigator · 11/06/2020 15:14

Is the Duchess of Kent a 'royal' or just one of the many, many members of the British aristocracy? In any case, she would never have such a high profile as Harry, she is miles away from the throne.

Goldengroveunleaving · 11/06/2020 15:18

I understand her husband is a royal duke.

No, that's why I (more or less) said so - but can you imagine her Sussex equivalent doing something so quiet and modest, even if she could?

TheNavigator · 11/06/2020 15:21

@Goldengroveunleaving

I understand her husband is a royal duke.

No, that's why I (more or less) said so - but can you imagine her Sussex equivalent doing something so quiet and modest, even if she could?

I can't imagine any of the current Royals doing that, so again I don't understand why H&M are singled out for criticism that could be applied to all of them.
ARoseInHarlem · 11/06/2020 15:21

@Roussette

I suspect the renewal of the protection officers is down to an already molly-cuddled man being worried about repercussions from the US lawsuit. That will be the justification for the public expense (Epstein killed himself, or did he, dark forces at work blah blah).

That, and that not having protection officers would reduce his standing more than his over-inflated, corrupt, arrogant ego - one that’s used to flying private, living in mansions far grander than he could manage alone, fancy holidays and socialising in circles populated by people who’s wealth he’s been in thrall to, one that insists on defining his daughters as “blood princesses” fgs - could handle, probably.

Goldengroveunleaving · 11/06/2020 15:24

I can't imagine any of the current Royals doing that, so again I don't understand why H&M are singled out for criticism that could be applied to all of them.

Because the rest of the senior royals haven't gone off to do their own thing.

TheNavigator · 11/06/2020 15:28

I see, so they are trying to do things differently, but not in the way you, personally, approve of. I think it comes back to the fact that there is no pleasing everyone, presumably neither of them had the skills or ability to be a music teacher - or indeed the desire. I can relate to that.

Wolfgirrl · 11/06/2020 15:28

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Goldengroveunleaving · 11/06/2020 15:30

I see, so they are trying to do things differently, but not in the way you, personally, approve of

It would seem I'm not alone.

Roussette · 11/06/2020 15:31

I really don't think it's fair to compare MM to the Duchess of Kent. The DoK suffered terribly with her mental health, she was estranged from her husband and had a breakdown I believe and was unseen for a very long time, she is 86 now, and at the time wanted to do something totally under the radar focussing on something she loves, music, as a teacher. This is a different time and different circumstances and surely totally unrelated to the royals now.

Rose yes.
Looking at his list of patronages with about third to a half being golf clubs all round the world, and many charities throughout the world, he probably just buggered off to somewhere exotic for a holiday, asking his secretary to look up what he was patron of in that part of the world, and telling them to look after him when he got there.

But we better be careful talking about him on here, as I was firmly told that PA was not the subject (even though we are talking about other royals!)

TheNavigator · 11/06/2020 15:33

I'm beginning to think they planned to leave even before marrying, after squeezing what they could out of the taxpayer in the way of a free beautifully-renovated home, expensive clothes and A-list connections.

Do you have any reason to think that? It sounds a bit far fetched.

Roussette · 11/06/2020 15:35

A bit far fetched and a mean assertion AFAIC

Goldengroveunleaving · 11/06/2020 15:36

The DoK suffered terribly with her mental health, she was estranged from her husband and had a breakdown I believe and was unseen for a very long time, she is 86 now, and at the time wanted to do something totally under the radar focussing on something she loves, music, as a teacher.

I know she did, and she deserves total empathy for her suffering (and it almost seems unfair to her to draw attention to her at all). But it's such a startling contrast. Plenty of things people say on these threads (not talking about the sort of things that have caused deletions) are unrelated to the royals now, but I don't think the analogy is irrelevant.

Roussette · 11/06/2020 15:39

I think it's totally irrelevant given her age. It's two generations back.

Goldengroveunleaving · 11/06/2020 15:42

I think it's totally irrelevant given her age.

Feel free to think so.

Roussette · 11/06/2020 15:43

I will !

Froq · 11/06/2020 15:50

www.thesun.co.uk/news/uknews/11829682/meghan-markle-prince-harry-discussed-megxit-before-marriage/

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry ‘discussed Megxit before they got married’, new book claims

@Wolfgirrl

Swipe left for the next trending thread