Harry and Meghan 19 (The One With The Capitalisation)

[TheMustressMhor]

Off we go.

Oh God, a JOINT chat show, them both hosting, with a segment every day or week where they highlight a pleb doing charitable work and the audience holler “you go girl” a la Oprah’s fans.

Okay I’ll stop now

@CatherineOfAragonsPomegranate

Posters who have been abused on here - that's what Talk Guidelines are for ,presumably all abuse deleted

Nope

Hard to know what's going on .maybe MN didn't agree that they were abusive ?

Though I see that Ygrette thinks posts have been deleted ?
Well we weren't even allowed to say it without it being deleted as racist, unsupportive and finally "just jealous!"

Haha, Dandy. I started typing a post saying all the American guests would start everything off replying "yes, Duchess Meghan..."

"you go girl"

Let’s be honest Meghan was a Z list actress. For goodness sake she was asking advice on dating Ashley Cole before she met Harry.

She was never invited to any of the awards shows, Golden Globes, SAG, and most definitely not the Oscars. It was hilarious that people like Ellen, Oprah and the Clooney befriended her when she got engaged. It wasn’t her they were interested in it was the proximity to royalty and what they could get out of it.

Which is why it was gracious of the Queen to allow them a way back in after a year review

Agree, it was a sensible thing to do, but they have thrown in back in her and Charles’s face. The twelve month and retention of hrh was to give them a way back, if after a year it don’t work. They have acted like the review is a punishment, and that the hrh titles are theirs whatever, and their choice not to use them, but want everyone to be sure they still have them.

All very petty and undignified.

oh god, all the hand holding while sitting interviewing people on the sofa. Bad idea, Dandy, bad.

Can you report that post that mentioned it to MNHQ and get yourself deleted

Yolo I agree that H&M wouldn't have been invited to JP Morgan without Harry's royal birth .That will always be something he can be criticised for - you're Royal ,you're trading on your name . Fill your boots on that one .

As for whether or not he trousered money for it - neither you nor I know that do we ? But of course it will "suggest" to a whole host of ppl that he is "monetising " the RF .

For goodness sake she was asking advice on dating Ashley Cole before she met Harry.

But she could never have been taking Ashley Cole even remotely seriously. I reckon she just dropped that bit for the Journalist to chew on. At the time she wanted to raise her profile as an actress which was what the interview was about.

GracefulHippo yes I agree with your post at 15.58 . Well put .

annie

The Tig was a static version of a lifestyle and chat show. She did interviews on it think. These days there’s Instagram Live or whatever it is, much easier to put out live and video interviews now even just 3 or so years on.

The new order is coming my friends.

peridito do you seriously think H&M did the JP Morgan gig for the feelz?

OF COURSE they got paid. If you think otherwise you are seriously naive. Not to mention the benefits in kind - the private jet, the hotel suite, the room service blah blah.

As for whether or not he trousered money for it - neither you nor I know that do we ? No but it would be really easy to let it be known that it has been done for a charitable donation as they did for the Disney voice over thing? As they haven't said that it was for charity the speculation is rife.

As for whether or not he trousered money for it - neither you nor I know that do we

I know this is to someone else and True, but if you believe he spoke at the event, and spoke about his mother, why not also believe he got the reported million dollars for it. He’s not announcing he gave it to charity is he. In fact he’s not commenting at all. No one thinks he did it for free.just fancied talking to a load of bankers about his mother.

So either believe the whole story or believe none of it. But picking and choosing which element you believe is a bit non sensical.

I think that M needs to think very seriously whether she wants to continue with her legal action suing the MoS. It will add more negativity to their brand - not to mention the risks of M and perhaps H potentially being cross examined in open Court.

Don't mess with Granny,..

www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a22784926/queen-custody-royal-family-children/

By the same hand, the custody rule will also apply to any children that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle decide to have together in the future. There’s all the proof that Queen Elizabeth II might look like your friendly neighborhood grandmother, but she actually owns EVERYTHING. Including your kids.

I think we've established that Harry's position as a Royal will have to be used if he is going to achieve financial independence and also to promote charitable causes .

The criticism around this seems to come from the idea that they "are trading on the royal name, status and connections that they claim to find so objectionable " .

Except that the last bit about H&M finding the royal name etc objectionable is just supposition .

What a delight to find this thread up and running again!

Apparently they're making a shed load of money for each Instagram post. So doesn't matter if they're negative or positive, they're still earning from them. Perhaps they are very happy in the knowledge the negativity is helping their bank balance.

Perhaps that's also why they are putting such contentious statements out as it garners more publicity and £££££

@peridito
While there is not any jurisdiction by The Monarchy or Cabinet Office over the use of the word ‘Royal’ overseas

This bit signals they're pissed off enough to be point scoring.

Hard to know what's going on .maybe MN didn't agree that they were abusive ?

No I don't think MM fairly deleted abusive posts at that time. They are admittedly better now that they're wise to the tactics. I personally also received very personal and racist abuse in my inbox.

The option to Scroll On By is always available......

MN even!

I don't think the Queen is going to be asserting her custody rights over Archie this side of ever.

Perhaps they are very happy in the knowledge the negativity is helping their bank balance.

Perhaps they are, but the damage to reputation and the decline in public respect surely can’t make that worthwhile?

You didn't de-lurk for long, JillyHilly.