Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Telly addicts

The Traitorz #5 - with a cursive Z

1000 replies

witchycat2 · 13/01/2025 13:37

Continued discussion for series 3 of The Traitors UK.

OP posts:
Tomorrowisanewday · 16/01/2025 13:43

Bouledeneige no, it's not. It annoys me greatly, but in my opinion, people use it to make themselves sound more intelligent. When in reality, it has the opposite effect

Turkeyhen · 16/01/2025 13:46

whosaidtha · 16/01/2025 13:42

@Turkeyhen I thought this. In previous seasons there was x amount up for grabs I always thought the traitor pot should be made up of any money they don't bank. Eg out of 15k they get 10K so 5k goes to the traitor pot.
But my husband pointed out that this is already a game show called The Mole.

With The Mole we viewers don't know who the mole is though (also it's nowhere near as good as The Traitors imo). I still think it would be a good idea for The Traitors to add some jeopardy to the missions and potentially give faithfuls something to go on (eg Frankie going for the wrong grave).

Turkeyhen · 16/01/2025 13:47

TheFifthTellytubby · 16/01/2025 13:32

I have a theory about why people do this - the longer and gentler-sounding "yourself" fulfils the function of a polite form of "you" that so many other languages have, but which is missing in English. There seems to be a misguided notion that it's somehow rude and/or confrontational to address someone directly as "you", which is why the use of "yourself" has crept in to soften it. Still drives me nuts when people do it though - even Lisa was at it last night, and she really should know better!

I agree with your theory, that's exactly what it is.

Snowmanscarf · 16/01/2025 13:49

They don’t seem as obsessed with the money compared to previous years.

JessyCarr · 16/01/2025 13:49

I agree there should be more jeopardy to the missions, if only to create some suspense for the viewer that they might not succeed. If there was a bit of brainwork involved which was more taxing than “count to 8 and convert it to Roman numerals” it might also make the Faithfuls less likely to eliminate anyone with an above-average IQ.

ViolinsPlayGentlyOn · 16/01/2025 13:50

The missions are definitely more straightforward this time around.

Turkeyhen · 16/01/2025 13:52

I hope they have a mission as in previous years where players have to vote for who is least trustworthy etc. I think players were strapped to a giant wheel last year for this one? That shakes things up and it's quite revealing.

ViolinsPlayGentlyOn · 16/01/2025 13:53

Turkeyhen · 16/01/2025 13:52

I hope they have a mission as in previous years where players have to vote for who is least trustworthy etc. I think players were strapped to a giant wheel last year for this one? That shakes things up and it's quite revealing.

Great potential for Leanne to get utterly pissed off as well!

Doingmybest12 · 16/01/2025 13:58

Turkeyhen · 16/01/2025 13:47

I agree with your theory, that's exactly what it is.

When I hear it on the programme I think it's just the way people talk from different parts of the country.

Turkeyhen · 16/01/2025 14:01

Doingmybest12 · 16/01/2025 13:58

When I hear it on the programme I think it's just the way people talk from different parts of the country.

I hadn't thought of that, but it strikes me that it's infectious - once it starts, eventually (almost) everyone is at it - which makes me think it's nothing to do with regional variations. It seems the more players use "yourself", the more brutal "you" feels.

APushbikeNamedReluctance · 16/01/2025 14:11

I think the easiest sabotage to add tthe tasks is, every task has a potential sheild or shields (most do anyway) but in all task there is some way a traitor can 'deactivate" the sheild. Either traitirs can do something which prevents physical access to the sheilds or they have to complete small extra task which makes any won sheild defunct (which is discovers after main task is complete).

LindorDoubleChoc · 16/01/2025 14:13

Oh wow, I'd forgotten about that buried in coffins task from Series 1!

Agree that all the tasks have been really mediocre this year. Wasn't there a particularly nasty one last year where they were all in a haunted house and part it involved crawling through tunnels half filled with water? That was actually tense.

The "Stag's Forest" and "Idle Lake" of last night sounded like a treasure hunt for the nursery class.

Agree with all the pp about Anna - where has this "the Traitors have been gunning for me from day 1" bolleaux come from? No they haven't love.

APushbikeNamedReluctance · 16/01/2025 14:17

Doingmybest12 · 16/01/2025 13:58

When I hear it on the programme I think it's just the way people talk from different parts of the country.

It is, and I warn anyone who it winds up, if you're planning on watching the Irish Traitors, "yourself" has common usage.

See also anyone has conniption over "haitch". Though you might get away with not hearing that unless there's a spelling or an alphabet task 😄

Turkeyhen · 16/01/2025 14:17

APushbikeNamedReluctance · 16/01/2025 14:11

I think the easiest sabotage to add tthe tasks is, every task has a potential sheild or shields (most do anyway) but in all task there is some way a traitor can 'deactivate" the sheild. Either traitirs can do something which prevents physical access to the sheilds or they have to complete small extra task which makes any won sheild defunct (which is discovers after main task is complete).

That sounds good. I'm thinking if something like this were to happen, maybe it would neutralise the flaw in the format that gets the interesting people banished first leaving us with dim dullards to watch? Also as a pp suggested, make the missions more difficult - an incentive to keep the clever players in.

tailinthejam · 16/01/2025 14:19

TetHouse · 16/01/2025 08:33

I think it’s just a cliché they’ve absorbed from previous seasons that they keep repeating as if it’s some kind of deep analytic question that lets them See Through Traitors’ Eyes. When it often just means ‘I’m stupid enough not to be threatening’, or ‘I’m just not on anyone’s radar’ rather than ‘A Traitor loves me and wants me to share the prize money!’

Leanne has always annoyed me, and yes, she was astonishingly unpleasant to polite, diplomatic Alexander (whom I kind of like, for his jumpers and the fact that he looks rather like a nice werewolf, if a werewolf had lovely manners and an air of ‘Let’s talk this through before anyone gets hurt…’)

Surely if, as the letter Fozia read suggests, Leanne was an officer rather thsn a squaddie, she’s familiar with accents and manners like Alexander’s from work? That round table attack came across to me as if she were being chippy on class grounds, but being ex-army, he’s hardly the first middle-class man either an air of authority she’s encountered.

When she encounters senior male officers at work, she can hardly go off on a major strop and accuse them of being patronising, can she? No. She has to do as she's told.

She's probably been bottling up all that resentment for years and Alexander took the brunt of it. He's a 'commanding officer' type, she instinctively recognised that, and it's got her hackles right up.

Moonlightdust · 16/01/2025 14:23

ChanelBoucle · 16/01/2025 09:57

I must say, I’m finding the contestants quite unlikeable this series. I feel there’s not a lot of character or humour to any of them. I haven’t watched S2 yet but compared to S1 I just don’t feel there’s a lot of intelligence or depth to any of this group (and given the calibre of S1’s lot that’s saying something 😆)

Edited

You will love S2 then as a great bunch of personalities there with lots of humour I felt. Nothing will beat that series in my opinion ☺️

ThePoshUns · 16/01/2025 14:24

Lentilweaver · 16/01/2025 08:51

Alexander does look like a polite werewolf and yes, he has lovely jumpers.😀

Yes, Minah had Linda eating out of her hand! She is great. Hope she can do tje same with Charlotte.

lol at polite werewolf and yes, he does!

tailinthejam · 16/01/2025 14:42

CaveMum · 16/01/2025 12:47

I maintain that Alexander could be ex-MI6 - Foreign Office/Diplomat is always used as a cover job for spooks <taps side of nose>

I may or may not know someone who may or may not have said that about him too.
<also taps side of nose>

Lentilweaver · 16/01/2025 14:46

tailinthejam · 16/01/2025 14:42

I may or may not know someone who may or may not have said that about him too.
<also taps side of nose>

I know someone who works with Alexander. He currently works with the NHS and is apparently lovely and polite in real life too.

Don't think he is MI6.

Dulra · 16/01/2025 14:47

APushbikeNamedReluctance · 16/01/2025 14:17

It is, and I warn anyone who it winds up, if you're planning on watching the Irish Traitors, "yourself" has common usage.

See also anyone has conniption over "haitch". Though you might get away with not hearing that unless there's a spelling or an alphabet task 😄

Yes a common phrase in Ireland. Mick walks into a pub "ah it's yourself Mick" as a sort of greeting. Tbh I was quite surprised to see it used as a phrase in UK

witchycat2 · 16/01/2025 14:51

Does anyone really care about the fake accent? It seems utterly pointless

OP posts:
JaneJeffer · 16/01/2025 14:52

Ah sure you know yourself.

witchycat2 · 16/01/2025 14:52

It won't be long until we're on to thread 6. Any suggestions for the next title?

OP posts:
Turkeyhen · 16/01/2025 14:53

witchycat2 · 16/01/2025 14:51

Does anyone really care about the fake accent? It seems utterly pointless

I agree with the pp who said that if Charlotte spoke in her real (posh English) accent she may have been targeted sooner.

JaneJeffer · 16/01/2025 14:53

witchycat2 · 16/01/2025 14:51

Does anyone really care about the fake accent? It seems utterly pointless

If I was Welsh I would find it offensive

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.