Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Telly addicts

Traitors UK S2 Thread 5 - “Another man? Just like olden times”

1000 replies

CaveMum · 20/01/2024 11:02

Welcome Faithfuls!

This thread is for Traitors UK S2. Posting at TV pace so if you are not fully up to date then beware of possible spoilers.

Hang up your cloak, and pull up a chair at thr Roubd Table.

Who would like to start?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Nesbi · 21/01/2024 08:32

eastegg · 20/01/2024 23:48

I wonder if anyone will notice Harry’s mistake, well I think it’s a mistake but maybe I’m overthinking. He’s taken a few of them aside (think it was 3, possibly 2, and it included Zach, who can be pretty astute on a good day), and said ‘shh, I’ve got a shield but it’s a secret from the traitors so when they try to kill me we can see who looks surprised the next morning’.

Great, but that plan would depend on him being 100% sure he was talking to faithfuls. Which he couldn’t be if he were faithful. You’d perhaps confide in one person, but more than that? He’s confided in Mollie as well. Those people should really be thinking ‘how can he be so sure we’re faithfuls?’

I think what Harry would say is that he was running it like an experiment. He can say he was sure that he would be the next target for the traitors, so he split the other players into two groups - Group A that knew he had a shield, and Group B that didn’t.

if someone else got murdered that night it would suggest that Group A has one or more traitors, because it was only the fact that a traitor knew about Harry’s shield that saved Harry from murder.

Because no one is getting murdered, Harry can say that the traitors must ALL be in Group B - because he can spin the story that the traitors tried to kill him and failed so they obviously didn’t know about his shield.

That rules out Group A - Mollie, Jaz and Zach - having any traitors in it. They all knew he had a shield so wouldn’t have wanted to waste a murder.

He doesn’t need to have trusted the members of Group A when he told them about his shield, because they were all being “tested”.

I think he is going to try to create mutual trust within Group A and get them all focussing their suspicions onto Group B.

if it works that would buy him time for someone in Group B to be banished (Jasmine?), and then probably someone in Group A would be murdered the following night (Jaz or Zach, keeping to the narrative that the traitors are all in Group B).

I hope that’s what he is thinking as I’d like to see it play out! Still lots that can go wrong, and the other traitors may be the threat he is underestimating.

MaggieFS · 21/01/2024 08:35

I think I've finally put my finger on one of the reasons I wasn't so keen on that episode... yes it's edited (and as I said on the previous thread, I don't mind that, because it makes for good tele and doesn't manipulate the outcome, because it isn't a public vote), but I think there showed us a lot of chats which then didn't come to anything at the round table. So rather than building suspense, it felt a bit clunky. Perhaps those chats will prove significant in future episodes, but it didn't flow smoothly for me.

MaggieFS · 21/01/2024 08:39

This reply has been deleted

Withdrawn at poster's request

I agree with this.

I felt that Paul was playing a character, whereas I've seen quite a bit of Harry which seems to be more the true personality that I'm less keen on.

That said, he is certainly working for the win and would be deserving. I would, just prefer Jaz. I think he's also been working at it, but can't get the cut through.

CuttingMeOpenthenHealingMeFine · 21/01/2024 08:40

eastegg · 20/01/2024 23:48

I wonder if anyone will notice Harry’s mistake, well I think it’s a mistake but maybe I’m overthinking. He’s taken a few of them aside (think it was 3, possibly 2, and it included Zach, who can be pretty astute on a good day), and said ‘shh, I’ve got a shield but it’s a secret from the traitors so when they try to kill me we can see who looks surprised the next morning’.

Great, but that plan would depend on him being 100% sure he was talking to faithfuls. Which he couldn’t be if he were faithful. You’d perhaps confide in one person, but more than that? He’s confided in Mollie as well. Those people should really be thinking ‘how can he be so sure we’re faithfuls?’

I think in there, with it being so high pressured, especially when the group is so small, having someone acknowledge that they are sure you are faithful might just make you relieved rather than suspicious and happy that they are unlikely to vote for you.

Failing that Harry could just say that he was suspicious of Zak/Jaz and wanted to test to see whether someone else would be killed that night because he had shown them the shield.

I do however think that he is overplaying his hand and will go soon.

PurpleWhirple · 21/01/2024 08:42

This reply has been deleted

Withdrawn at poster's request

This is spot on. Harry is a wrong'un and I hope Andrew and Ross turn on him, preferably when he's tantalisingly close to winning.

blacksax · 21/01/2024 08:56

herewegoroundtheblueberrybush · 20/01/2024 22:25

If the toads weren't harmed what's the problem?

Tv do stuff for effect all the time... I guess the coffins weren't necessary either, the castle isn't really necessary, the costumes aren't totally necessary 🤪

I'm glad you find animal welfare so hilarious.

FiveFoxes · 21/01/2024 08:56

anyoneanyoneanyone · 21/01/2024 08:25

Harry's smart move was convincing Andrew to pick Ross as a traitor. he knows Jaz is onto him and knew Jaz also suspects Ross so i think he's going to try and throw Ross under Jazs bus now

Why do you think Harry knows Jaz is onto him?

I don't remember any suspicions that Jaz has about Harry being mentioned to anyone apart from Zack and Evie, who haven't said anything.

I don't think Harry sees Jaz as a threat. To Harry's knowledge, Jaz is quiet, not particularly popular and not great at the game. We know differently.

I want Jaz to win!

MadeOfAllWork · 21/01/2024 09:01

TweeBee · 21/01/2024 08:14

When Aubrey was on Uncloaked, he said that Diane had sent a photo of her and her son at Christmas and that’s how he found out Ross was her son.
i thought that this was on the whole Traitors what’s app group rather than just between Diane and Aubrey, so I’m not sure that it will come out during the show at all.
If Diane told me to not mention it, I certainly wouldn’t!
I suppose perhaps the producers thought it would come out and be a source of drama, but they can’t make Ross say it. The problem for Ross is that, like in series 1, if you reveal you’ve been keeping a secret, people will think you’re untrustworthy and a traitor.

I think that the WhatsApp group had come about since filming. It certainly wouldn’t be before or during.

AnImaginaryCat · 21/01/2024 09:12

herewegoroundtheblueberrybush · 21/01/2024 08:31

Lolling at the idea of misogyny because my brain struggles to remember people's names in a large group of people I do not know and only see brief snippets of whilst watching a tv game show 😅

I also think people getting het up about Harry's turn of phrase about Diane are making an issue where there isn't one. He's playing the role of a traitor, he said it in a traitory way. It's a game.

Don't think anyone is getting het up about it. It's just being discussed by thought by those of us capable of accepting unconscious biases exists.

Yes he's playing the game but his use of language portrays how his thinks of those that were fodder for his "traitory ways".

MaggieFS · 21/01/2024 09:15

WhereAreWeNow · 21/01/2024 07:31

Do people really think Evie, Charlie and Mollie are all alike? I don't see any likeness, either physical or personality, other than they're all young and white and they've all got long blond hair.

To me they're as alike as Brian, Johnny, and Ross (young, white with short dark hair).

Not any more, but in the first few episodes where you get to work out who everyone is, they had barely any air time. Once they actually started to be visible, it's easy. And unbrushed, half brushed and insta ready was a helpful guide 😂

QueenOfThorns · 21/01/2024 09:17

Nesbi · 21/01/2024 08:32

I think what Harry would say is that he was running it like an experiment. He can say he was sure that he would be the next target for the traitors, so he split the other players into two groups - Group A that knew he had a shield, and Group B that didn’t.

if someone else got murdered that night it would suggest that Group A has one or more traitors, because it was only the fact that a traitor knew about Harry’s shield that saved Harry from murder.

Because no one is getting murdered, Harry can say that the traitors must ALL be in Group B - because he can spin the story that the traitors tried to kill him and failed so they obviously didn’t know about his shield.

That rules out Group A - Mollie, Jaz and Zach - having any traitors in it. They all knew he had a shield so wouldn’t have wanted to waste a murder.

He doesn’t need to have trusted the members of Group A when he told them about his shield, because they were all being “tested”.

I think he is going to try to create mutual trust within Group A and get them all focussing their suspicions onto Group B.

if it works that would buy him time for someone in Group B to be banished (Jasmine?), and then probably someone in Group A would be murdered the following night (Jaz or Zach, keeping to the narrative that the traitors are all in Group B).

I hope that’s what he is thinking as I’d like to see it play out! Still lots that can go wrong, and the other traitors may be the threat he is underestimating.

Also bear in mind that both the other traitors are in Group B. He’s probably going to try to get Ross banished rather than Jasmine?

WhereAreWeNow · 21/01/2024 09:17

True @MaggieFS - it is harder to remember who's who at the beginning.

QueenOfThorns · 21/01/2024 09:19

thevegetablesoup · 21/01/2024 08:15

Also Evie is Scottish and Charlie was from Bristol so you can't get much more different in terms of accents. Or are people ignoring what they say and just going off their looks?

Yes, I listen to WHAT they say, not what accent they say it in! I found them almost indistinguishable at first, now just fairly difficult to tell apart!

MaggieFS · 21/01/2024 09:27

Certainly in this chat (previous threads), confusing the blondes stemmed from an early round table where someone said the name "Evie", and it seemed most of us on the thread simultaneously all shouted "who?" at our TVs.

TweeBee · 21/01/2024 09:29

MadeOfAllWork · 21/01/2024 09:01

I think that the WhatsApp group had come about since filming. It certainly wouldn’t be before or during.

Yes that’s what I meant, so the relationship doesn’t come out in the show.

thevegetablesoup · 21/01/2024 09:41

@QueenOfThorns that is fascinating to me, it wouldn't occur to me not to notice someone's accent if you see what I mean, I'm fascinated by accents!

ToMeToYouAndBack · 21/01/2024 09:51

Riverlee · 20/01/2024 13:38

I wonder who else they considered for the presenting role, as Claudia to me wouldn’t be the obvious choice to me - she’s more jovial Strictly than Herr Flick or Anne Robinson on The Weakest Link. However, she’s nailed it!

By the way, did anyone else take half of series one to realise that it was Claudia’s face on the flag, which I thought was just a nice heraldic pattern, until I realised it was a cloak and face.

Edited

I always saw a face, but it's not Claudia's. It's just a face

NonPlayerCharacter · 21/01/2024 10:09

Are we talking about this? That's not Claudia, it's just a face. I've always loved it as the logo.

Traitors UK S2 Thread 5 - “Another man? Just like olden times”
QueenOfThorns · 21/01/2024 10:11

thevegetablesoup · 21/01/2024 09:41

@QueenOfThorns that is fascinating to me, it wouldn't occur to me not to notice someone's accent if you see what I mean, I'm fascinated by accents!

If I was listening to someone talking for a long time, it would gradually seep into my consciousness that they had an accent. And even then, I might not be able to work out what their accent was unless I could relate it to someone else with a known accent, if you see what I mean? So, I might think that someone talks a bit like Cheryl Cole and then be able to place them as being from the north-east, for example. I’m not sure that this is normal, more likely that I’m a dunce where accents are concerned!

QueenOfThorns · 21/01/2024 10:13

TweeBee · 21/01/2024 09:29

Yes that’s what I meant, so the relationship doesn’t come out in the show.

I would think that they’ve just been forbidden to talk about certain topics. So, who wins in the end will certainly come out on the show, but I doubt that they’ve been allowed to reveal it to anyone who was kicked out before the last episode.

mrstea301 · 21/01/2024 10:15

Ellysetta · 20/01/2024 18:42

I think…

In between Harry/Andrew saying “let’s not recruit”, and then suddenly saying “let’s recruit Ross” a chunk of conversation is very clearly missing. And I think that chunk of conversation included the cameraman saying “What about Ross?” Harry and Andrew probably thought it was a helpful hint, but it was a stitch-up. (Ross was a weird choice of recruitment, if Harry/Andrew had really chosen themselves they would have picked either Mollie or Jaz.)

AND

In between Ross saying “No. No. I’m going to say no.” and then suddenly saying “I’m going to accept and get revenge for mum” there is very obviously another chunk of conversation missing. And I think it included the cameraman pointing out that if Ross becomes a traitor he gains the opportunity for revenge.

And I think the show set up Ross to be ridiculously upset about his mum being voted out because they put her in a coffin and made him lay flowers, incredibly upsetting to a son as he knows one day he’ll do that for real. Only Diane’s death was made slow and upsetting, the others were all fast and unseen.

I’m not saying it’s all scripted, and I have no real problem with the producers influencing the show in this way, although I do think making Ross attend his mum’s mock-funeral went too far and was unethical. But the producers are now setting up Ross to win. Taking down Harry is easy now. Ross can win with Andrew or backstab him at the last minute, but the producers have handed Ross the win if he wants it, in the same way as the producers suddenly made it impossible for Will to win in series one.

Hmmmmm.

Diane was asking on uncloaked how she thinks Ross would have felt about it, and she was very unconcerned. A lot of family members are actors, so she said "oh my son was blown up in a programme the other, this happened to my daughter / son in law"
Essentially saying that they know it's all pretend!

ToMeToYouAndBack · 21/01/2024 10:19

florentina1 · 20/01/2024 16:47

I thought the churches were studio sets. I know we see the outside of them but I thought the interiors were mock ups.

Yes, like the cabin in the woods

WhereDidTheYearsGo · 21/01/2024 10:22

NonPlayerCharacter · 21/01/2024 10:09

Are we talking about this? That's not Claudia, it's just a face. I've always loved it as the logo.

It's always looked like Claudia to me too

MadeOfAllWork · 21/01/2024 10:24

Even Charlie agreed that her and Evie looked alike.
I’m a teacher and often when you get a new class some of those 30 children blur. You know all the children but you do confuse some in the early days, especially boys as they tend to have the same hair cut.
It’s the same here. Especially when Mollie, Charlie and Evie got very little airtime.

theconfidenceofwho · 21/01/2024 10:28

If Ross gets banished, is he able to say he's a recruited traitor, or just a traitor?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread