anyone watching Harry and Megan

[Member869894]

on tv now?

Yes I disagree with your interpretation of various bits of 'evidence' so I must be Samantha.

To whom are you referring 'joyful'?

Might be me GlitchStitch stop trying to take all the glory for yourself!

Nope because you’re fixated on defending a man you’ve never met.

Oh the irony....

I’ll be sure to tell Kate her biggest fans say hi.

What's Kate got to do with anything?

Nope because you’re fixated on defending a man you’ve never met.

No, I'm questioning the demonisation of a man who not a year before she got engaged Meghan herself was gushing about. But when Meghan writes nice things about him you say she's appeasing her abuser(?) and when she says not nice things about him they are gospel truth. I just personally think the truth is likely somewhere in the middle.

I have met her...

All that means is that you are predisposed to like her, not that your judgement is any better than posters who haven't, but don't like the look of what they see.

'Hospital denial plus papped at the same time he should have been in a post-surgical ward is pretty good proof!'

I don't know what it's like in the US but hospitals in the UK are bound by confidentiality. Even if it was made up who on earth can blame him, they should have really invested time and effort in making him feel he was an important part rather than giving interviews.

Also find it ironic that you are so gleeful that he was intrusively 'papped', by whom? They don't have these paps in the USA apparently

I don't think Meghan=bad and Thomas=good, the only one making such definite judgements about people's character is you. I just questioned the evidence for some of the stuff you stated as fact because I'd read things that contradicted your claims, including from Meghan herself.

But you're right, we don't know anything about the relationship between Meghan and her father, mainly because they both seem as inclined as each other to bend the facts to suit themselves.

I am Meghan. You’re all being mean. All I ask is that you are fair. Here, have a 🍌

And they both aren't adverse to using the media to put out their side either, Thomas either in person or via Samantha, and Meghan via her friends.

I’ll be sure to tell Kate her biggest fans say hi.

Please do! A signed picture would be nice if it's not too much bother. Cheers!

GoFiguire

Equating People Magazine with British tabloid journalism is truly laughable. People is mainly a celebrity (royals included) lovefest.

Just reading through all this and have come to the conclusion that the reason so many people feel uneasy about Meghan is summed up by the phrase 'she seems fake'. Sometimes that is a gut instinct, the result of lots of little things that all add up. I can hear Bertrand saying 'what exactly did she do that was fake'.... sometimes you just feel in your gut that someone isn't authentic and isn't going to be a Good Thing in the long run.

That's a good point @Blingandrings. Also, within the acting fraternity, fake is their real. I suppose it's a difficult habit to shake if you've been immersed in it since childhood.

I don't think she claimed not know Harry, just not that much about him. Also I think she asked her friend if he was 'nice' not 'kind' which is perfectly reasonable.
I agree with pp that MM might have been deferring to H in not pushing for him to meet her father. Or maybe she's just embarrassed by her df, sadly.

She's been the way she is since childhood, but it's fake? What makes her fake? And yes, you do need to have something more than your gut, otherwise it just appears that confident well-spoken American woman spells fake to you.

I think I also blame the wider RF for (not preparing Meghan's dad) it reeked of snobbishness. We're so superior, we can't deign to meet our prospective inlaws, they're commoners after all

TBF there's quite a history of sidelining the families of those who've "married in". It's not until the Middletons that it's become common to see inlaws at RF events, and that's almost certainly at the request of William

On a side note it'll be interesting to see what W&K do about where to spend Christmas, if it's Charles hosting instead of the Queen ...