^acciocat* - so now you've changed your argument from whether or not the McCanns actually said that the abduction was a fact and that I've been shown evidence that they not only said that but also that they insisted there were no other possibilties .
Now you're claiming that because the McCanns said they knew Madeleine was abducted then they discounted all other theories .
I still don't know why this is of such concern to you but I would have thought that the extract posted p125 shows that Kate did consider the possibilty that Madeleine wandered off .But that she dismissed it for the reasons given .
Why are you so interested in "all" these other theories being ,as you think ,dismissed ?
There aren't that many - abduction from inside or outside the flat while "wandering " ,or some unknown accident inside or outside the flat.
I think when you say things like
My point was about the mindset of the McCanns- they put in motion a massive PR machine and even set up a company within days of their daughter going missing and part of that was promoting one possible theory, and trying to steer people away from thinking anything else might have happened
your true motive in criticsing the Mc Canns becomes clear . It's not just that you think that they have no evidence for an abduction and therefore shouldn't present it as a belief or fact .
It's because you think they were deliberately promoting a theory with the intention of steering ppl away from thinking "something else might have happened "
And despite your protestations to the contrary it's clear what you think that something was and who was responsible ..