Because I’m thinking about the brands that form the core of my ‘going out to meet other grown ups’ wardrobe, and laughing at the Margaret Howell mail shot I’ve just opened. (Socks and sandals photo.) Beautiful young model, and each garment will be wonderfully well made - but I know no one under fifty who wears MH. That’s fine - but I wish the marketing acknowledged the fact.
When a brand does make an effort to engage with the real buyers of its clothes I’m full of awe and gratitude - Raey at Matches is usually great at this.
Studio Nicholson hovers somewhere in between. Again, everyone I know (in the UK) who wears their clothes is older and richer than me, probably in a creative profession. Not a wispy 20 year old.
I never used to care. But I’m wondering if marketing is the reason 99% of the middle aged and older women on MN exclaim that there are no decent clothes for them. There are - but not every brand tells you so.
For beauty and fashion style advice, join in our Style forum chat.
Style and beauty
Can we talk about clothing brands and target demographics?
CrkdLttrCrkdLttr · 28/02/2023 13:33
mewkins · 28/02/2023 23:43
Wet Leg (the band)? 😄
I quite like both of those dresses though.
NatashaDancing · 28/02/2023 22:20
I can afford Margaret Howell. I'm probably their demographic. I own cotton dresses which are in the price range of this. No way would I pay £565 for it
www.margarethowell.co.uk/womens/all/dresses/drawcord-dress-washed-cotton-black
Who is the demographic for Batsheva?
batsheva.com/en-gb/collections/dresses/products/clemmie-dress-in-medium-blue-denim?variant=43584983236857
This reply has been deleted
This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.
Newsletters you might like
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.